Fallacies In A Modest Proposal

511 Words2 Pages

“The Modest Proposal” is anything but modest. It is actually kind of scary, creepy might just be would be a better way to put it. Johnathan Swift comes off as innocent because he is genuinely sympathetic to the people of Ireland in the beginning of the story. Swift comes off as knowledgeable, confident and caring person when he presents his idea to help resolve the problem occurring in Ireland. Swift uses a scare tactic and then appeals to false authority in order to try and convince the people of Ireland that this could be logically sound proposal.
One way that Swift tries to persuade the reader that his proposal is normal or ethical is through the fallacies of the scare tactic. Swift uses his proposal as an attack on the economic problems going on in Ireland. In the beginning swift begins to persuade the reader that his proposal is logical and normal. Do we agree on the fact that eating children is morally and economically wrong? He also states that his proposal would make the children “beneficial to the public” (444). Can we agree that Swift is not suggesting that the people of Ireland would really eat their children. More or …show more content…

Swift mentions that he received his information from a “very knowing American” (443). Under false authority it is explained that it is extremely common for people to back up their claims by claiming evidence that is not their own. Swift is persuading the people with a proposal that is technically not even his own. He gives overwhelming facts and statistics which are most likely not correct. These statistics were very hard to understand and seemed to give a lot of information that came off confusing. As a reader we read statistics and automatically assume they are correct. This is where false authority comes in. Again people trying to back up their claims by claiming evidence that is not their own. This was just data and statistics given by some “knowing American”

Open Document