Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The perception of beauty
Perceptions of beauty
The perception of beauty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The perception of beauty
As research surrounding beauty has evolved over the years, race has most recently been a variable of consideration when discussing the universal standard of beauty. Since the establishment of the universal standard of beauty, much controversy remains questioning racial discrimination, biases and generalization. Yosh Jefferson comments in “ Facial beauty- Establishing a Universal Standard” that “ many orthodontic practitioners feel that facial beauty is racially and culturally influenced” (2004, p. 13). This is perhaps more true in American culture where the model for beauty is predominantly Caucasian (Evans & McConnell, 2003). Moreover, research has attempted to ask whether this predominance has negatively or positively influenced humanity and whether there is more to examine when considering such generalizations of a “universal standard of beauty”.
One such study conducted by Peggy Evans and Allen McConnell (2003) attempted to answer these questions in their research titled “Do Racial Minorities Respond in the Same Way to Mainstream Beauty Standards? Social Comparison Processes in Asian, Black, and WhiteWomen”. Their hypothesis was based on prior research that had proven Black women to be more resilient to mainstream Caucasian standards of beauty (Evans & McConnell, 2003). Wanting to explore other minorities, they selected Asian women as their target group in hopes to shed light on multicultural social comparison processing. Evans and McConnell’s results revealed that Black women were more inclined to implement “self-protective strategies;” whereas Asian women, were more susceptible to the influence of mainstream beauty standards and thus adopted such standards when judging their own body and facial attractiveness (2003, p...
... middle of paper ...
...e question of how much of beauty is in the eye of the beholder heavily depends on the attractiveness homogeneity of the faces used” (2006, p. 208). Lastly, he also comments that future research should address differences in judge’s scoring (Honekopp, 2006).
Based on the presented researcher studies throughout this review, they attempt to use Hönekopp’s question of whether private or shared taste is influenced by race and the degree to which race influences judges facial attraction scores when lined in succession with the race and when diversely arranged. Thus our question asks “whether individuals employ the ‘universal standard of beauty’ when judging facial attractiveness? Or do individuals have specific standards of beauty per ethnicity?” We will attempt to answer this question by measuring judges’ between group facial scores through the use of several t-tests.
The concept of whiteness being the ideal standard for physical appearances is ingrained into every girl’s brain through dolls given during early childhood due their parents’ preconceived notions that they desire the same things they did (Morrison 20).
There is a famous saying that states, “ we should not judge a book by its cover”, but oftentimes the first thing noticed on a person is their looks. One’s “physical beauty” strongly influences people’s first impressions of them. As a whole, we tend to assume that pretty people are more likeable and better people than those who are unattractive. Around the world, we believe that what is beautiful is good. There is a general consensus within a culture about what is considered physically appealing and beautiful. “Physical beauty” is associated with being more sociable, intelligent, and even socially skilled. Society shares this common notion of who has and who does not have “physical beauty”. Thus, “physical beauty”, as seen
All human beings are conscious of their appearance. Society conditions the individual to meet distinct appearance criteria and sets forth an image that is deemed “attractive”. This struggle to fit norms, known as lookism, is discriminatory in its nature. Defined in 2000 by the oxford dictionary as “’prejudice or discrimination on the grounds of appearance’”, this new “ism” has risen to the surface in recent years (Ambrosetti 52), showing the prominence of its affects. Human beings construct circumstances that rule their realities. Gender, ethnicity and culture are all cultural constructions that have no true meaning once removed from society. That being said, lookism is biases of identification that influence one’s
The ideal female beauty in American culture is predominately white (Bankhead & Johnson, 2014). Throughout U.S history, women’s mainstream beauty ideal has been historically based on white standards such as having blonde hair, blue eyes, fair skin, a thin ideal body, straight hair, and thin lips (West, 1995; Yamamiya, Cash, Melynk, Posavac, & Posavac, 2005; Leslie, 1995). Therefore, the features of African American women tend to be viewed as undesirable and unattractive compared to the European standards of beauty (Awad, Norwood, Taylor, Martinez, McClain, Jones, Holman, & Hilliard, 2014). According to Ashe (1995), “African beauty, body and hair have been racialized, with slim/”keen” European features being the accepted standard of beauty since enslaved Africans was forcefully brought to the Americas.” The physical characteristics of Black women such as having broad noses, brown skin, full lips, large buttocks and course hair has been looked down upon throughout United States history (Byrd & Tharps, 2001). In effect, the standard of beauty of European features that were forced on slaves are internalized and currently seen in the standard of beauty of African Americans (A.A) (Chapman, 2007). These standards include African Americans perceiving light-skinned as being more favorable than dark-skinned (Maddox & Gray, 2002; Perdue, Young, Balam,
Society, especially western, tends to conceptualize beauty through the use of publicity and cinema. We are under constant bombardment from consumer related magazine ads, billboards, television commercials, and movies about what “beautiful” people look like and how we should imitate them. This standard is overwhelmingly portrayed as a white beauty standard. Starting from a very young age this standard of beauty is created in our minds. We want to look like these actors and models; we want to be thin, fit, youthful looking, a symmetrical face and even have a particular race. We accept this beauty standard; we notice our various faults among ourselves and self-critique. We try to emulate the models as best we can; we forget that these standards are not reality. Publicity models and the most popular actors do not represent the majority of us and it is a foolish and unattainable dream to attempt to change ourselves to their beauty. The pressure society puts on us can cause low self-esteem and diseases such as anorexia. But we must look at the antithesis of society’s conception of this white standard, our minorities. Portraying this beauty standard to the polar opposites is more than racist. It is destructive to the minority community in that it creates resentment, low self-esteem, and a perverse hierarchy where minorities judge themselves and others on their proximity to the white beauty standard. In The Bluest Eye, Morrison critiques the white beauty standard that causes the black minority to feel a destructive self-hatred towards themselves and their fellow blacks because their self-perception is an unrealistic and unattainable beauty seen in publicity and films. This research paper’s aim is to present the influence of ...
“Beauty is not in the face; beauty is a light in the heart” (Kahlil). People focus more on the outward appearance instead of the inward appearance. One’s inward appearance is comprised of their character, values, morals, and the true nature of their heart. On the other hand, the outward appearance is composed of one’s dress and grooming. The inward and outward appearance determines whether or not a person is ugly or beautiful. The choices that we make also define whether or not one is ugly or beautiful; choices made in the past can sometimes be repeated in the future.
The concept of beauty and racism in modern western society is held to the highest of standards for all of it’s members; including celebrities. The perfect woman is described by Odette (2013), as solely for men’s pleasure and domination. If we look on the cover of any popular magazine, the women are usually: light skinned, slender, and tall. Men on the other hand must be tall and powerfully built. Our culture is valued on the basis of how men and women are perceived by their image, making it impossible for the average man or women to achieve the high beauty standard expected in society. Celebrities play an influential role in the way people view themselves, making the need to look like our favourite celebrities all the more desired. A person's
As the practice is becoming increasingly popular, mainstream acceptance has given birth to a society that values appearance over ability and ultimately leading on to discrimination in practically every field. There is an overwhelming amount of evidence that indicates that appearance has become a vital contributor of success at the workplace and even in educational institutions for that matter. A study by researchers from Rice University and the University of Houston indicated that candidates with facial scars and blemishes faced lower odds of being remembered by their interviewers which lowered their ratings and evaluations (as cited in ...
“When women evaluate their physical attractiveness, they compare themselves with an idealized standard of beauty, such as a fashion model,” Says Richard Robins, ___. (Flora) Our self-concepts are built on thousands of these comparisons. Social comparisons happen not only when you deliberately scrutinize passersby, but constantly and automatically. (Flora)
So, I was disappointed to see that I prefer Blacks over Whites. On the other hand, it’s not that I support Whites over Blacks. Instead, I wanted my test to show an impartial outcome, where I am akin to Blacks and Whites. Conversely, according to David Perrett, there is a logical reason why some are favored over others. Spelled out in his book, In Your Face: The New Science of Human Attraction, Perrett documents the evolution of the human face and how our brain mechanism analyzes faces and attractiveness, which in turn affects how we respond to others. For instance, “The relationship between beauty and health is inconclusive; Perrett reports studies that show the influence on facial fat (less attractive) and skin colour (oxygen- and carotenoid-rich skin is more attractive) on attractiveness ratings.” Although we can’t unwire how we are programmed, if Perrett’s findings are accurate, we can expose ourselves to what’s unlike us to study and appreciate the
It is only in recent years that physical attractiveness was looked upon from a scientific point of view and not simply a poetic or philosophical pondering. We now know that we have a predisposition to see physical attraction as the primary factor of romantic attraction. When people first begin to date, they are more attracted to the partners they deem to be more physically attractive 1. Another example of physical attraction as an influential factor of our attraction to others is seen in the matching hypothesis. The matching hypothesis proposes that the forming of a successful relationship is far more prone to occurring with people whom they consider to have an equal level of physical attractiveness to themselves.
An “ideal beauty” is an entity which is admired or possesses features widely attributed to beauty in a particular culture for perfection. There is evidence that a preference for beautiful faces emerges early in child development, and that the standards of attractiveness are similar across different genders and cultures. A study published in 2008 suggests that symmetry is also important because it suggests the absence of genetic or acquired defects.
Throughout history there have been many claims about what is beautiful and what is not on the face and body. America’s idea of beauty in the past changed many times from the fragileness of the Steel-engraving lady to the voluptuousness of the Greek slave. The ideal beauty in America is not so different from the ideal beauty of cultures around the world and follows many of the traditions practiced throughout history. The widespread of advertisement and technology is something that’s said to be the contributing problem to the ideal women phenomenon, but I believe history and trend plays the bigger role.
How many times have we heard or said the clique “don’t judge a book by it’s cover,” yet we focus so much of our attention on our physically appearance. Everyday we encounter images in the media that make us believe we have to look a certain way. Physical beauty is portrayed as important and essential in order to find love and acceptance. Although physical beauty is moderately important, it is less than inner beauty for it diminishes with age.
The first and most popular interpretation of the word “beauty” is seen as outer appearance. On that perception, “beauty” and “attractiveness” have a significant difference even though they are word cousins. A beautiful looking person may be attractive, but an attractive person does not need to be beautiful. One person may look at someone beautiful with “deep satisfaction in the mind” because that person admire how beautiful the other is. Someone, who is not striking beautiful looking, may attract other people just by how they express their personalities. The others who are attracted to that particular individual because they feel connected, happy, and comfortable around that person. While attractiveness may result in long lasting relationships, physical beauty only brings short term pleasant feeling in the mind. Yet, beauty as outer look conquers many societies around the world. For instance, American culture tends to value the way a person look. That value is transmitted from one generation to the next by families, peers, and media in the process of enculturation. Young children come to adapt ways of thinking and feeling about physical beauty from their families first. The show