Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Corporate governance essay introduction
Corporate governance essay introduction
Weaknesses in corporate governance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Corporate governance essay introduction
Summary: Many academic institutions, such as Cornell University and the University of North Carolina, define an argument is a main idea, often called a claim, backed up with evidence that supports the idea. The purpose of this paper is to analyze arguments made by Mr. R. Thomson about the excessive executive pay and weather he succeeded in presenting a clear and convincing argument. Introduction: Mr. Roger Thompson is Editor of the HBS Alumni Bulletin. In his article “Excessive Executive Pay: What’s the Solution?” Harvard Business School, he raises a critical economic issue about the relationship between the recent economic meltdown and the excessive executive pay. He also proposes a set of solutions to solve the current crisis and prevent another from occurring. Mr. Thompson does not think that executive pay practice itself had a role in creating the financial meltdown. Furthermore, he thinks the huge compensation plans with incentives led to the financial crisis. Mr. Thompson develops a solid argument about the excessive executive pay by presenting evidence to support his claim, using counterargument of others who disagree with his position, and by showing deep understanding of the issue. He analyzes the issue from many perspectives: government perspective, Chief Executive Officers’ perspective, research perspective, and academic perspective. Evidence and Counterargument The author starts by explaining how the government got involved with the financial sector by providing billions of dollars to large financial companies, such as AIG. The author claims that the White House and congressional leaders are trying to shift the balance of power away from executive management. The author... ... middle of paper ... ...d enhance the communications channels with the senior executives. I certainly agree with Mr. Marshall, a research associate from the center for research on globalization, when he stared: “ultimately everyone is responsible in a position of power. Together they have all accumulated this bad debt”. (Marshall, 2010) Works Cited D. Teather: The Guardian, US executive pay goes off the scale. Retrieved Feb 10, 2011 from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2005/aug/04/executivesalaries.executivepay2 Bolton, P., Mehran, H. and Shapiro, J. (2010): "Executive Compensation and Risk Taking”. Retrieved Feb 11, 2011 from http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr456.pdf Andrew Marshall. Retrieved Feb 09, 2011, from http://www.globalresearch.ca/ Roger Thompson. (September, 2009). Excessive Executive Pay: What’s the Solution, Harvard Business School.
His arguments and conclusions are well thought through, so much that they draw opponents to reason with him.
Argumentation has followed humans from the dawn of time as a way for us to express our ideas and for our ideas to be heard. People naturally obtain the knowledge to persuade others, either backing their opinions by fact or touching others emotionally, from growing up and through their own experiences in life. We can be persuaded by a numerous amounts of different factors pertaining to the argument. There are four different types of strategies in which an argument can be presented and make the argument effective. Martin Luther King is a key example of the utilization of the strategies as he wrote, “Letter from Birmingham Jail” and Nicholas Carr also portrays the strategies with his essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Both authors perfectly
The ultimate goal of an argument is to examine our own ideas as well as others. Arguments revolving around the past, present, and future can be presented in any form. Articles of forensic argument, for example, deliberate the past and what happened leading to questions as to why this happened, or what should have been. Articles regarding the present hold many problems people will debate on and set ways for the future. Arguments of how to bring about a worthier and more flourishing future will be disputed in deliberative arguments. Argumentation is everywhere.
Many people today would consider the 2008, United States financial crisis a simple “malfunction” or “mistake”, but it was nothing close to that. Contrary to what many believe, renowned economists and financial advisors regarded the financial crisis of 2007 and 2008 to be the most devastating crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930’s. To make matters worse, the decline in the economy expanded nationwide, resulting in the recession of 2007 to 2009 (Brue). David Einhorn, CEO of GreenHorn Capital, even goes as far as to say "What strikes me the most about the recent credit market crisis is how fast the world is trying to go back to business as usual. In my view, the crisis wasn't an accident. We didn't get unlucky. The crisis came because there have been a lot of bad practices and a lot of bad ideas". The 2007 financial crisis was composed of the fall of many major financial institutions, an unknown increase in mortgage loan defaults, and the derived freezing up of credit availability (Brue). It was the result from risky mortgage loans and falling estate values (Brue) . Additionally, the financial crisis of 2007 was the result of underestimation of risk by faulty insurance securities made to protect holders of mortgage-back securities from risk of default and holders of mortgage-backed securities (Brue). Even to present day, America stills suffers from the aftermaths of the financial crisis.
In the midst of the current economic downturn, dubbed the “Great Recession”, it is natural to look for one, singular entity or person to blame. Managers of large banks, professional investors and federal regulators have all been named as potential creators of the recession, with varying degrees of guilt. No matter who is to blame, the fallout from the mistakes that were made that led to the current crisis is clear. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the current unemployment rate is 9.7%, with 9.3 million Americans out of work (Bureau of Labor Statistics). Compared to a normal economic rate of two or three percent, it is clear that the decisions of one group of people have had a profound affect on the lives of millions of Americans. The real blame for this crisis rests on the heads of the managers that attempted to play the financial system through securitization, and forced the American government to “bail out” their companies with taxpayer money. These managers, specifically the managers of AIG and Citigroup, should be subject to extreme pay caps for the length of time that the American taxpayer holds majority holdings in their companies, as a punitive punishment for causing the Great Recession.
Three examples of argument is everywhere. First, there is an argument always in politics. Second, there are always argument in religion. Third there is always argument when you turn on the Television and the media stirs up an argument.
Evans, J. D., & Hefner, F. (2009). Business ethics and the decision to adopt golden parachute contracts: Empirical evidence of concern for all stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(1), 65-79. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9818-9
Sumo, V., & Weitzman, H. (2013). Are CEOs overpaid? The case against. Retrieved from Capital Ideas: http://www.chicagobooth.edu
(Murphy, 2008) The US banking sector was first hit with a crisis amongst liquidity and declining world stock markets as well. The subprime mortgage crisis was characterized by a decrease within the housing market due to excessive individuals and corporate debt along with risky lending and borrowing practices. Over time, the market apparently began displaying more weaknesses as the global financial system was being affected. With this being said, this brings into question who is actually to blame for this financial fiasco.
To win an argument one must keep in mind the following factors: Is the argument
Mandelbaum, Robb, “There is a Salary Gap when pay themselves”. New York Times. Ed. Abramson Jill, Pub: New York City, February 18, 2014
In any organization, sometimes, monetary schemes doesnot get people involve to pursue work in a certain way, rather it demoralize and threatens the self-esteem of employees. According to Meyer (1975), “the basis for most of the problems with merit pay plans is that most people think their own performance is above average”. The amount may ...
Remuneration management is defined as the sum received for an employment or service delivered, this includes the money received on a monthly basis as well as benefits given as rewards (investopedia,para.1 ). Individualism need to be taken into account when implementing these remuneration structures or reward schemes, equal pay plays a role in balancing earnings among the diverse workforce (Shen, Chanda, D’Neetto and Monga,2009,p.241). The Woolworth’s Holdings uphold remuneration policies which have the purpose of making sure to attract and hold on to the best talent, that they are congruent with the strategies of the company and are the determinants of performance during the short and long phases. The policy considers the board members and the employees. This policy manages employees of the company by giving...
Johnson, Sam T. "Plan your organization’s reward strategy through pay for performance dynamics: Compensation & Benefits Review 30, Number 3: (May/June 1998): 67-72
... firm can attract qualified management without causing an influx in operational costs (wages), if portions of employee compensation were to be replaced with stock options; adjusting options with company performance. If accomplished in this manner, every employee would be concerned with how well the company was doing financially. I also recommend that Chuck Lacy find non-financial arguments and data which justify the recruitment of top managers in the marketing and production departments. In addition, Ben & Jerry's could counter employee turnover by establishing new techniques in the recruitment and interview processes to detect candidates who do not share values consistent with those of Ben & Jerry's.