Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of physical attractiveness on job success
Literature review on physical attractiveness and romantic relationships
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of physical attractiveness on job success
Does Physical Attractiveness Play a Part of Being Successful? Some people may have the interpretation that physical attraction determines how successful you are. Along with that, others discriminate in favor of attractive people. What characteristics and how does physical attraction determine success in life? The two articles, “What is Beautiful is Good” and “I’m Successful Because I’m Beautiful” both explain the connections of physical attraction and success and also share several studies of characteristics of physical attraction and the certain aspects to why and how they matter. “What is Beautiful is Good” written by Karen Dion goes deep in and investigates the physical stereotype in a broad study that looks at how attractiveness affects one’s personality traits are perceived. The study withal visually examines whether physical attractiveness leads to a more preponderant life. Studies perpetuate to fixate on the question of how physical attractiveness affects one’s prosperity in life. Through elements of attractiveness and also gender, body size and age, it is likely that physical allure comes to influence in three separate regions of life and they are popularity, perceptions of performance and social interaction. The point when nearly taking a gander at diverse mulls over about physical engagingness, scientists generally give careful consideration on gender, body size and age as three standard components. Physical presence according to Dion is the peculiar trademark most similar and reachable to others in social cooperation. (“What is Beautiful is Good”) Gender is one range regularly kept tabs on when considering physical engagingness. The results of guys and females regularly contrasted as a result of sex. For instance, in... ... middle of paper ... ...articles share the fact the several studies had to determine the difference of physical attractiveness between men and woman. The articles also came to comparison when talking about certain factors of attractiveness, like the body size and the age. Popularity was a subject in both “What is Beautiful is Good” and “I’m Successful Because I’m Beautiful” articles. It was basically stated in both articles that more popular people are mostly successful. So what if two females are getting interviewed for a job and there’s only one position available? The unattractive female gets the job over the attractive one. Does this mean she won’t be successful through life just by her physical attractions? As stated in “I’m Successful Because I’m Beautiful”, “Physical attractiveness can determine success in life.” Is this what we call discrimination in favor of attractive people?
Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E. F., & Coats, G. “The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies”. Personnel Psychology, 56 (2003): 431-462.
Physical Attractiveness And Courtship. Sexual Behaviour, I, 22-25 Walster, E. (1966) Importance Of Physical Attractiveness In Dating Behaviour. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 4, 508-516 Wilson, G. (1983) QED:The Science Of Sexual Attraction, BBC Television.
know beauty in any form”(86). We are so conditioned to see female beauty as what men
With all three works I detailed in this analysis, literature details appearance; either with physical and psychological or even both. Appearance is what we as society’s base us on either with morality or what presents itself well.
There is a famous saying that states, “ we should not judge a book by its cover”, but oftentimes the first thing noticed on a person is their looks. One’s “physical beauty” strongly influences people’s first impressions of them. As a whole, we tend to assume that pretty people are more likeable and better people than those who are unattractive. Around the world, we believe that what is beautiful is good. There is a general consensus within a culture about what is considered physically appealing and beautiful. “Physical beauty” is associated with being more sociable, intelligent, and even socially skilled. Society shares this common notion of who has and who does not have “physical beauty”. Thus, “physical beauty”, as seen
Facial symmetry is also linked to agreeableness, extraversion and conscientiousness, so good-looking people generally find it easier to make friends and hold down jobs. Attractive people are most likely to succeed because some companies are looking for models to be on the cover of their magazines. They are always making money just to be on the cover of a book that people always complain about and they would just say that should I try this product do you think it will help my stubborn fat and try to lose it by taking this daily with food or water. Researchers say that they can tell if people are attractive or unattractive because they watch guys looking at women and giving facial expressions to tell the other person what they think about the girl or girls.
According to recent research, there have been people who have found that this effect can be present in the media. Reporters and journalist are more likely to report the news of attractive people rather than no eyed-catching people. The article “Better-Looking Politicians Get More Media Coverage” published by ScienceDaily explains and presents the results of these studies, which have been performed by the University of Haifa’s Department of Communication. The results of these researchers have shown that better-looking, political tenure, seniority and army rank get higher frequency of TV news coverage. With this statement, we can infer that not only the appearance counts, but also what kind of people merit respect for inhabitants inside the society.
Akst emphasizes how women take superficial looks more into an account than men which reveals his bitter emotions directed towards women. Akst also provides no evidence for the circumstances of this research study which leaves readers with no evidence to back up his claim. He is so bitter towards women’s obsession with beauty that he tries make a correlation that may not even be
Many have wondered or even noticed if people that are more attractive get treated better than the ones who are less attractive. I have recently read two articles on whether this is true or not; turns out, the statement is true most of the time. I read the article; Viren Swammi wrote on YouBeauty.com called “Do Attractive People Get Preferential Treatment”. You beauty is a website that gives people beauty tips and general information. The other article I read was one that had done an abundant amount of research. The article was a peer reviewed scholarly article; the article was written by Angela M Griffen and Langlois H Judith the article was titled “Stereotype Directionality And Attractiveness Stereotyping: Is Beauty Good Or Is Ugly Bad?” The writing between the two pieces of writing is exceptionally diverse. The mass media article was much more broad and addressed everybody as a whole, while the scholarly article was much more in depth and addressed mainly other grad students studying that study. Each article made their claims in their own way. Also the way sources were used in the paper was different. Overall both articles were interesting, but one was more informative and direct than the other.
In the essay “What Meets the Eye”, Daniel Akst explains scientific facts about the beauty of men and women matters to people. He argues that attractive individuals receive attention, great social status, marries, and gets paid more on a job. One can disagree with Akst’s argument because anyone with the skills and knowledge, despite the appearance, can gain a decent relationship and can get paid well. Akst looks at beauty as if it can lead individuals to an amazing and successful life, but he is wrong. Nancy Mairs’ and Alice Walker’s views on beauty are explained internally and through self-confidence. Both women’s and Akst’s arguments on beauty share some similarities and differences in many ways, and an
Highly attractive models tend to be associated with the "what is beautiful is good" stereotype, in that beautiful people are believed to have more positive life outcomes (e.g., more successful careers, better marriages) and not suffer from the problems of "normal" people (Dion, Berscheid, and Walster 1972; Kanner 1994; Waister et al. 1966). Whereas NAMs are considered to be somewhat attractive, they are perceived to be normal people to whom these more positive life outcomes are not attributed. " (Bower, Amanda B., and Stacy Landreth.) Being beautiful can influence whether they become successful or not.
Employment discrimination legislation has evolved to include race, disabilities, sexual harassment of either gender, and age. In lieu of this evolution and an increasing trend toward equality for all individuals in the workplace, the time has come for the protective reach of employment discrimination law to cover ugliness. While the proposal may cause titters at first, evidence exists that discrimination based on looks (or physical appearance) occurs in the workplace. An investigation was conducted by ABC’s 20/20 news program in 1994 that sent two men and two women into the workplace to secure the same jobs (Sessions 1). The individuals were coached to act in a similar manner during the interviews and took with them resumes with matching education and experience. The only difference was that one of the men and one of the women was superior in physical attraction to their counterpart. The results demonstrate whether intentional or not, looks discrimination does play a role in the employment process “In five cases out of five, the more attractive woman got the job; in three chances out of three, the more attractive man was hired” (Sessions 1).
Good physical appearance helps in building up flexible relationships. For example women who take care of their physical appearance manage to have a better relatio...
How many times have we heard or said the clique “don’t judge a book by it’s cover,” yet we focus so much of our attention on our physically appearance. Everyday we encounter images in the media that make us believe we have to look a certain way. Physical beauty is portrayed as important and essential in order to find love and acceptance. Although physical beauty is moderately important, it is less than inner beauty for it diminishes with age.
The first and most popular interpretation of the word “beauty” is seen as outer appearance. On that perception, “beauty” and “attractiveness” have a significant difference even though they are word cousins. A beautiful looking person may be attractive, but an attractive person does not need to be beautiful. One person may look at someone beautiful with “deep satisfaction in the mind” because that person admire how beautiful the other is. Someone, who is not striking beautiful looking, may attract other people just by how they express their personalities. The others who are attracted to that particular individual because they feel connected, happy, and comfortable around that person. While attractiveness may result in long lasting relationships, physical beauty only brings short term pleasant feeling in the mind. Yet, beauty as outer look conquers many societies around the world. For instance, American culture tends to value the way a person look. That value is transmitted from one generation to the next by families, peers, and media in the process of enculturation. Young children come to adapt ways of thinking and feeling about physical beauty from their families first. The show