Examples Of Individualism In Walden

718 Words2 Pages

Thoreau is a philosophical man that believes in individualism, freedom, and the love for nature. Many people of Concord and other travelers portray him as a person with strong beliefs that guide his lifestyle. He settled in Walden pond where he built his own house out of the nearby-standing trees surrounding his plot of land. By following his beliefs, Thoreau chopped down the trees, utilized the availability of the land to his disposal, and the most important factor; manages all of his expenses and revenue. To many wandering eyes, they identify Thoreau as a strong belief person that lives the life of simplicity, utilizing the limited amount of money he has and his resourceful mind to obtain the maximum usage of each item. In the novel Walden, …show more content…

Therefore, Thoreau compares how he travels versus how the working man travels to places. His financial belief relates to his philosophical reasoning by stating that walking to places using one’s own feet, he/she can arrive quicker and at the same time save a day’s work of pay, instead of a person who works a whole day and has to spend all his income to arrive at the same place. The paradox explains two distinctly different style of people. On one side, there are the working men who would spend a whole day’s worth of pay, only to pay a fare to be taken to a destination that can be reached by walking. On the other side there are men, like Thoreau, who choose to walk to their destination, arrive quicker than their working counterparts, and at the same time save their hard earned money on other necessities. That concludes that most working men only look at one route in traveling, unlike Thoreau, he looks at the bigger picture. Although Thoreau philosophical claim to many people seems outrageous, he provides ample examples and evidence to support his view that by living simply, yet poor, one can be richer than most working …show more content…

In Walden, Thoreau’s philosophical claim interprets that by spending money on valuable projects that have meaning, not only men but the states can save money on communication. He claims that man invents newer and more efficient means to communicate. But, the big picture he states is that by inventing new tools they are, “improved means to an unimproved end, an end which it was already but too easy to arrive at; as railroads lead to Boston or New York.” By Thoreau’s reasoning, the improve means of communication waste money because the people or the states may not have anything to communicate about. Therefore, he believes that communication should only be implemented where there is information that’s important or benefits others. In other words, although people build lines for the sake of communicating, Thoreau’s philosophical reasoning ask people to thoroughly think the means and expenses for building unnecessary projects when the money can be transferred into a project that’s needed to save money for both the states and

Open Document