Examples Of Argumentative Effects Of Japanese Camps

561 Words2 Pages

Throughout the world, wars were fought to finally have ownership of land. Without these wars many places wouldn’t be conquered. In the US, on december 21st when pearl harbor was bombed after that event the president during that time commanded all japanese people of all ages to attend a camp. This argumentative essay Will present why I think this camp wasn’t a necessary act and is racist to many. My first reason is that one third of the japanese population that was sent to the camps were american. Why would american citizens have to go to camps, they’re apart of america! They may have some Japanese genes from past history but they were born and raised in america, they don’t deserve to get pulled into a camp like that. This is a racist act based on the pearl bombing incident , just because of that over 120,000 individuals were forced to head there. Suspected as “ spies “ or “ bombers “. In addition, getting forced to leave didn’t take place with the German or Italian nationals. …show more content…

After the war has officially ended and the japanese when back obtain all their things, they couldn’t have it back and ended up losing it because the people they sold it too took advantage of the companies and jobs given to them. This is not fair to all the japanese individuals that created these companies or it was passed down to them, giving them away and never getting it back is heartbreaking. It is not likely if a neighbor was very genuine and gave back their land when the japanese was let free. The japanese was probably unemployed during that time or had to work for their own companies! How wrong is that? I believe that this gives my opinion even more meaning, that the camps were necessary and

Open Document