Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing financing to debt to finance to equity
The impact of capital structure
Debt and equity differences
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparing financing to debt to finance to equity
Firms around the world rise funds in the capital markets to finance their expansion, acquisitions and other operations. This is usually done through equity and/or debt financing. Equity financing is the process in which a firm raises capital through the sale of shares. Debt financing involves the firm borrowing through, for example by issuing bonds.
The firm‘s decision on how to rise capital influences its capital structure and as a result may affect the value of the firm. It is therefore important that the firm must take into account the risks involved in both equity and debt financing. In order to be able to make an optimal decision, a firm that uses the combination of both equity and debt must ensure an optimal debt-equity ratio, i.e. the one that minimizes the costs and risks and maximizes the overall value of the firm.
The traditional view of capital structure is that changes in the debt-equity ratio would affect the value of the firm because it would change the risk shareholders bear. Therefore, for the firm to determine their optimal capital structure they must consider the cost of capital to the firm in line with the Capital Assets Pricing Model which says that individual investors require a higher return in compensation of an increase in the risk they bear.
Modigliani and Miller (1958), argued that under certain assumptions a firm‘s debt-equity ratio does not affect the cost of capital. According to them there is no optimal debt-equity ratio and the amount of debt issued by the firm is irrelevant and does not matter how much or how little it borrowers. They also argued that changes in the debt-equity ratio will not affect the value of a firm. This means that the value of the firm is independent of its capital structure....
... middle of paper ...
...is no longer demanded or consumed, if company X require more machinery it might its self with high quantity of redundant assets. Machinery has maximum production levels, i.e. a limit at which it can produce in a certain point of time. If the demand of the product increases significantly the machine may be unable to produce to a level that will meet the demand.
As the capital- labor increase the amount of labour will be reduced. Even though Company X has a flexible work workforce that can be easily be fired, letting go of some of the workforce will come at a cost. This cost includes compliance costs relating to retirement, and payout retrenchment packages.
My advice to Company X on the change to operational structure is that, it can increase the capital-labour ratio as long as the cost of the acquisition is equals to or less than the cost of retaining the workforce.
These ratios can be used to determine the most desirable company to grant a loan to between Wendy’s and Bob Evans. Wendy’s has a debt to assets ratio of 34.93% while Bob Evans is 43.68%. When it comes to debt to asset ratios, the company with the lower percentage has the lowest risk. Therefore, Wendy’s is more desirable than Bob Evans. In the area of debt to equity ratios, Wendy’s comes in at 84.31% while Bob Evans comes in at 118.71%. Like debt to assets, a low debt to equity ratio indicates less risk in a company. Again, Wendy’s is the less risky company. Finally, Wendy’s has a times interest earned ratio of 4.86 while Bob Evans owns a 3.78. Unlike the previous two ratios, times interest earned ratio is measured on a scale of 1 to 5. The closer the ratio is to 5, the less risky a company is. From the view of a banker, any ratio over 2.5 is an acceptable risk. Both companies are an acceptable risk, however, Wendy’s is once again more desirable. Based on these findings, Wendy’s is the better choice for banks to loan money to because of the lower level of
In SIVMED’s case, based on the definition of WACC, all capital bases should be included in its WACC. These include its common stock, preferred stock, bonds and long-term borrowings. In addition to being able to compute for the costs of capital, the WACC also determines how much interest SIVMED has to pay for all its activities. The value of the firm’s stock, which we want to maximize, depends of the after-tax cash flow. Hence, after-tax values for WACC are also needed. Furthermore, cost of capital is used to determine the cost of each debt, stock or common equity. Being able to analyze these will be essential into deciding what and how new capital should be acquired. Hence, the present marginal costs are ideally more essential than historical costs.
Based on the optimal capital structure analysis, they should pursue as 70% debt proportion, which will give them the lowest cost of capital at 11.58%. Currently Star has no debt in their capital structure, so these new projects should begin to add debt to the company. However, no matter what debt and equity proportions are chosen for each project, the discount rate of 11.58% should be used, as the capital budgeting decisions should be independ...
MCI current capital structure is x% debt and y% equity. Their key ratios are a, b, and c. Comparing to other firms in the utilities industry they appear to be underutilizing (debt/equity). (See exhibit D). Referencing the forecast there is expected to b...
DuPont has been known for its low reliance on borrowings. In the 1970’s, the company had to assume a substantial portion of debt of Conoco, a newly acquired company. In 1983, the managers have to decide about the future optimal target debt ratio. Should the company continue to keep about 40% of its assets financed via debt or should it strive to lower its borrowings to 25%?
The consistent high spending of capital equipment is the first reason why one would recommend reducing the debt to equity ratio. A company with higher levels of debt is less flexible in being able to adjust to new market demands and conditions that require the company to make new products or respond to competition. Looking at the pecking order of financing, issuing new shares to fund capital investing is the last resort and a company that has high levels of debt, must move to the equity side to avoid the risk of bankruptcy. Defaulting on loans occur when increased costs or bad economic conditions lead the firm to have lower net income than the payments on loans. The risk of defaulting on loans and the direct and indirect cost related to defaulting lead firms to prefer lower levels of debt. The financial distress caused by additional leverage can lead to lower cash flows available to all investors, lower than if the firm was financed by equity only. Additionally, the high debt ratio that Du Pont incurred also led to them dropping from a AAA bond rating to a AA bond Rating. Although the likelihood of not being able to acquire loans would be minimal, there are increased interest costs with having a lower bond rating. The lower bond rating signals to investors that the firm is more likely to default than if it had a higher (AAA) bond rating.
Brealey, Richard A., and Myers, Stewart C. Principles of Corporate Finance. Sixth ed. McGraw Hill, New York, © 2000.
Having a low P/E ratio with respect to the rest of the market, and the replacement cost of the firm being greater than its book value (argument 3), there is a good chance that the current stock price and the proposed offering price are too low. Although long-term debt is a better financing choice, a few of the drawbacks are pointed out. Debt holders claim profit before equity. holders, so the chances that profits may be lower than expected. increases risk to equity, may reduce or impede stock value. However, the snares are still a bit snare.
Higher leverage is very likely to create value for a firm considering capital structure change by exerting financial discipline and more efficient corporate strategy changes.
However, this move is not always a wise one because when an enterprise has fewer workers it would reduce its productivity which would mean more financial problems. Besides it strains the workforce. If these corporations continue incurring losses they eventually close down and as a result, the workforce loses jobs. This is what has been going on since December 2007. Unemployment is one of the biggest problems that governments have to deal with. (compston 2002).
The capital structure decisions for Target Inc. are significant since the profitability of the firm is specifically influenced by this decision. Profit maximization is part of the wealth creation process and wealth maximization can be a lengthy process for financial managers. Profits affect the value of the firm and it is expressed in the value of stock. Cost of capital is how investors evaluate weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Capital structure ratios help investors gauge the level of risk that a company is taking on through financing. While Target
Ÿ Capital structure/investment - This information is taking from the Balance sheet, but also from the Profit and Loss Account. This is examining the sources of finance the company has used and also looking at it as a potential investment opportunity. There are certain features, which must be present if financial information is to meet the needs of the user. The two most important features are that: Ÿ The information should be relevant to those who are using it.
A key benefit of equity financing is that the company will not be debt repayments. This is beneficial...
The capital structure of a firm is the way in which it decides to finance its operations from various funds, comprising debt, such as bonds and outstanding loans, and equity, including stock and retained earnings. In the long term, firms seek to find the optimal debt-equity ratio. This essay will explore the advantages and disadvantages of different capital structure mixes, and consider whether this has any relevance to firm value in theory and in reality.
“For example, if the organisation decide to expand, fixed costs will definitely increase. Sometimes, organisations decide to reduce certain fixed costs to improve their cash flow, by moving to a less expensive workplace or reducing the number of employees”.