Equity investors will look at the ROCE in order to determine if a firm is effectively deploying its capital. Having a ROCE that is in-line with its competitors will aid Barra Airways in achieving a good price for its equity, should it choose to use equity as a source of finance.
Barra Airways has an interest coverage ratio (ICR) of 18; this means that Barra Airways is not burdened with a large amount of interest payments on existing debts. Therefore, using debt does appear to be an attractive source of finance. This is because Barra Airways existing interest burden is low, meaning that to increase it would have a reduced effect on the company’s net profit. However, EasyJet has an ICR of 30.88, considerably larger than that of Barra Airways [5]. Lenders may look at this data and conclude that Barra Airways is a riskier company to lend too than others in the same industry; this will result in a higher interest rate on any debt taken out.
In order to reach a decision on which method of raising finance would be appropriate for Barra Airlines an analysis of the benefits and drawbacks of both the debt and equity method must be undertaken.
Using equity as a source of finance would mean that Barra Airways would be increasing the level of shareholder accountability it currently has. In the future, Barra Airways may find that in the future its freedom to make conduct business freely is hindered, if it issues more equity. The legal action taken by shareholders against companies has risen substantially since 1996 [7]. If this trend continues into the future then the likelihood of Barra Airways experiencing shareholder activism is significant.
A key benefit of equity financing is that the company will not be debt repayments. This is beneficial...
... middle of paper ...
... Airways with the burden of increased repayments without the assistance of increased revenues.
It is my recommendation that Barra Airways goes ahead with the project. I believe this is the case because the project is predicted to a high NPV coupled with strong cash flows. The method of financing I am recommending that Barra Airways uses is to issue more equity. This is primarily due to the confidence the market currently has in low-cost airlines. This will not only achieve the best value for the company but will also maximise the shareholder value of the project. The secondary reason behind the decision to use equity as the source of the projects finance is protecting the company against future debt repayments. If the cash flows prove to be unreliable then the company could find itself paying a higher than expected proportion of operating profit on paying its debts.
These ratios can be used to determine the most desirable company to grant a loan to between Wendy’s and Bob Evans. Wendy’s has a debt to assets ratio of 34.93% while Bob Evans is 43.68%. When it comes to debt to asset ratios, the company with the lower percentage has the lowest risk. Therefore, Wendy’s is more desirable than Bob Evans. In the area of debt to equity ratios, Wendy’s comes in at 84.31% while Bob Evans comes in at 118.71%. Like debt to assets, a low debt to equity ratio indicates less risk in a company. Again, Wendy’s is the less risky company. Finally, Wendy’s has a times interest earned ratio of 4.86 while Bob Evans owns a 3.78. Unlike the previous two ratios, times interest earned ratio is measured on a scale of 1 to 5. The closer the ratio is to 5, the less risky a company is. From the view of a banker, any ratio over 2.5 is an acceptable risk. Both companies are an acceptable risk, however, Wendy’s is once again more desirable. Based on these findings, Wendy’s is the better choice for banks to loan money to because of the lower level of
The purchase of the parent company would be financed with all equity. An individual or team of investors would pay the purchase price and they would receive equity in the Runway Fashion Exchange parent company. The value of the equity would increase as the compan...
Based on the optimal capital structure analysis, they should pursue as 70% debt proportion, which will give them the lowest cost of capital at 11.58%. Currently Star has no debt in their capital structure, so these new projects should begin to add debt to the company. However, no matter what debt and equity proportions are chosen for each project, the discount rate of 11.58% should be used, as the capital budgeting decisions should be independ...
The Airline Industry is a fascinating market. It has been one of the few industries to reach astounding milestones. For example, over 200 airlines have gone out of business since deregulation occurred in 1978. Currently, more than 50% of the airlines in the industry are operating under Chapter 11 regulations. Since 9/11, four of the six large carriers have filed for and are currently under bankruptcy court protection. Since 9/11 the industry has lost over $30 billion dollars, and this loss continues to increase. Despite the fact that the airline industry is in a state of despair, JetBlue has become the golden example, a glimpse of what the industry could be.
The consistent high spending of capital equipment is the first reason why one would recommend reducing the debt to equity ratio. A company with higher levels of debt is less flexible in being able to adjust to new market demands and conditions that require the company to make new products or respond to competition. Looking at the pecking order of financing, issuing new shares to fund capital investing is the last resort and a company that has high levels of debt, must move to the equity side to avoid the risk of bankruptcy. Defaulting on loans occur when increased costs or bad economic conditions lead the firm to have lower net income than the payments on loans. The risk of defaulting on loans and the direct and indirect cost related to defaulting lead firms to prefer lower levels of debt. The financial distress caused by additional leverage can lead to lower cash flows available to all investors, lower than if the firm was financed by equity only. Additionally, the high debt ratio that Du Pont incurred also led to them dropping from a AAA bond rating to a AA bond Rating. Although the likelihood of not being able to acquire loans would be minimal, there are increased interest costs with having a lower bond rating. The lower bond rating signals to investors that the firm is more likely to default than if it had a higher (AAA) bond rating.
Despite the uncertainty and inherent risks, however, even if WACC exceeds IRR, the board may be well advised to accept the project. It's expected that in the first few years, Boeing will incur more expenses that income. The revenues will come at a later date when the 7E7 planes are delivered. The project will have to be evaluated periodically and management will have to make changes to ensure that the company is profitable based on current and future conditions. The board's prerogative is not to give Airbus a profit sanctuary' by not accepting the project but rather to maintain or increase its market in the industry even if it's not profitable in the shot-run. Boeing has deep pockets' and should be willing to challenge its competitors.
Return on capital employed (ROCE) expresses a company’s profit and displayed as a percentage of the amount of capital invested in the company. ROCE interprets “capital employed” as the total amount of money invested in the company in the long term, regardless of whether that money has been supplied by shareholders or lenders. This amount will compared with the return achieved on that capital. The results were shown that Wm Morrison Supermarkets are higher than Tesco by 4.55 per cent.
Improves the company’s capital raising ability to fund future growth and acquisitions and pay down debts
Is The Tyranny Of Shareholder Value Finally Ending? N.p., n.d. Web. The Web.
...rs, setting a good trend for the corporation. They also have a very low debt-to-equity ratio, indicating that they have enough equity to easily pay off any funds acquired from creditors. As a creditor I would feel safe in lending them funds for any future projects or endeavors.
only make up 16.7% of the capital structure. Thus, the credit risk for any credit commitment was not too high
The aviation industry is very difficult to enter, and the threat of new entrants is low. The first and major threat to entry is the initial capital requirements. The development period is over 5 years, with very large initial investment costs, parts costs, and wages are necessary even before the company earn revenues and sell aircrafts. The economies of scale, when the airline company has a substantial order, there are reduction in cost because of discounts on large orders. The new entrant suffers a significant cost, which is a disadvantage compared to established companies. Another risk for the new entrant, the extra supply of products for the substantial order, will decrease prices. The result, the new entrant will
In 1981 British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher instructed Lord King, the chairman of the BA, to prepare the airline for privatization. In fact, the company had a lot of problems and it was impossible to convert the airline quickly from unprofitable, stated-own to profitable, private company. By 1981British Airways had strong financial difficulties as it lost £200 per a minute.
There is a range of criteria relevant for a decision of financing a new venture. To construct my list for the evaluation of a new company as an opportunity I have selected to refer to t...
Obviously, this case aims to evaluate Joanna’s analysis. Throughout the analysis, we will estimate the cost of debt, cost of equity, and cost of capital through different financial analysis models.