Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments essay on physician assisted suicide
Church response to the ethical issues of euthanasia
Arguments essay on physician assisted suicide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Arguments essay on physician assisted suicide
Euthanasia
The fear of enduring unceasing pain, of being trapped
by medical machines, of losing bodily integrity and personal
dignity and of being an emotional and financial drain on
one's loved ones- such fear lends strength to the movement
for euthanasia and for physician-assisted suicide (PAS).
Support for euthanasia/PAS has been spurred on by the
Hemlock Society, founded by former journalist Derek Humphry
and based in Eugene, Oregon. The society's political arm
helped draft initiatives aimed at legalizing euthanasia.
Ballot initiatives in the states of Washington (1991) and
California (1992) were both narrowly defeated by a 54 to 46
percent margin. The defeat of these "euthanasia" initiatives
shifted the focus to "assisted suicide," which gives more
control to the dying patient.
In 1994 Oregon passed its Death with Dignity Act by a
51 to 49 percent margin, becoming the first state to
legalize PAS. The statutes of Washington and New York
prohibiting PAS were subjected to constitutional review. In
June 1997 the Supreme Court ruled on Washington v.
Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill, declaring that PAS is not a
constitutional right. This ruling left each state free to
make its own decision about whether PAS and euthanasia
should be legally permitted within its borders. The Supreme
Court ruling recognized that our nation is already engaged
in an intense debate about the morality, legality and
practicality of PAS, and it encouraged the debate to
continue.
Michael Manning, a physician and a Roman Catholic
priest, reviews the arguments and takes a stand against
euthanasia/PAS. While giving unequivocal support to the
Roman Catholic position, his book is fair in its treatment
of opposing views.(...
... middle of paper ...
...
Herbin, Herbert. "Dying of Resentment." New York Times 21 Mar.
1996: Editorial Desk.
Humphry, Derek. Dying With Dignity. New York: Birch Lane, 1992.
Kearl, M. "Euthanasia and the Right to Die." Sociology of Death
and Dying. *http://www.trinity.edu/~mkearl/dtheuth.html*
McCuen, Gary E. Doctor Assisted Suicide: and the Euthanasia
Movement. Wisconsin: Gary E. McCuen publications inc.,
1994.
Robinson, B.A. "Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide: All
Sides of the Issue." Religious Tolerance. Ontario: Ontario
Consultants on Religious Tolerance, 1997.
*http://www.religioustolerance.org/euthanas.htm* 1 Jul. 2001.
Simons, Marlise. "Dutch Becoming first nation to Legalize
Assisted Suicide." New York Times 29 Nov. 2000:
Foreign Desk.
10. Walker, Richard. A Right to Die?. New York: Franklin Watts,
1996.
Barrington, Mary Rose. "The Right to Suicide." Problems of Death. Ed. Bender, David L. Anoka: Greenhaven, 1974. 114-119.
Dworkin, Gerald. " The Nature of Medicine." Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide: For and Against. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
Four doctors, three terminally ill patients, and a nonprofit organization called Compassion in Dying, came together to file a suit arguing that prohibiting PAS is against a person’s right to liberty (Illingworth & Parmet, 2006). This became known as the Washington et al. v. Glucksberg et al. case. This case went to the Supreme Court in January of 1997 and by that following June was ruled constitutional to uphold PAS as illegal (Washington et al. v. Glucksberg et al., 1997). The penalty for any assistance in a ...
Imagine, if you will, that you have just found out you have a terminal medical condition. Doesn’t matter which one, it’s terminal. Over the 6 months you have to live you experience unmeasurable amounts of pain, and when your free of your pain the medication you’re under renders you in an impaired sense of consciousness. Towards the 4th month, you begin to believe all this suffering is pointless, you are to die anyways, why not with a little dignity. You begin to consider Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS). In this essay I will explain the ethical decisions and dilemmas one may face when deciding to accept the idea of Physician-Assisted Suicide. I will also provide factual information pertaining to the subject of PAS and testimony from some that advocate for legalization of PAS. PAS is not to be taken lightly. It is the decision to end one’s life with the aid of a medical physician. Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary states that PAS is “Suicide by a patient facilitated by means (as a drug prescription) or by information (as an indication of a lethal dosage) provided by a physician aware of the patient’s intent.” PAS is considered, by our textbook – Doing Ethics by Lewis Vaughn, an active voluntary form of euthanasia. There are other forms of euthanasia such as non-voluntary, involuntary, and passive. This essay is focusing on PAS, an active voluntary form of euthanasia. PAS is commonly known as “Dying/Death with Dignity.” The most recent publicized case of PAS is the case of Brittany Maynard. She was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer in California, where she lived. At the time California didn’t have Legislative right to allow Brittany the right to commit PAS so she was transported to Oregon where PAS is legal....
1. What is the difference between a. and a. The slippery slope argument for assisted suicide is a straightforward one to see and prove. In essence, it says that if assisted suicide is allowed without any principled lines or divisions, then we must allow for assisted suicide in cases like that of “a sixteen-year-old suffering from a severe case of unrequited love.” First we must acknowledge the assumption that the Supreme Court has made, which is, there are no principled lines they can draw between the different cases of assisted suicide.
Markoff, Steven. “State by-State Guide to Physician Assisted Suicide” ProCon.org. 13 December 2013, 30 March 2014.
However, “The United States Supreme Court found that liberty as defined in the 14th Amendment does not include the right to assistance in dying” (Vacco v. Quill). It was later decided that the responsibility for determining whether assisted death should be legalized should belong to individual states. According to a report by CNN, in 1994 Oregon became the first state to legalize assisted suicide for terminally ill, mentally able adults. Today there are five states in which physician assisted suicide is legal. In Oregon, Vermont, Washington and California the option is given by each states individual laws. In Montana the patient must have a court decision. Oregon was the first state to pass the death with dignity act.
"Legalized Physician-Assisted Suicide in Oregon ñ The Second Year." Amy D. Sullivan, Katrina Hedberg, David W. Fleming. The New England Journal of Medicine. February 24, 2000. v.342, n.8
According to Oregon’s Public Health website, since October 27, 1997, 1,173 Oregon residents have obtained lethal prescriptions to end their lives using the Death with Dignity Act. As of 2014, only two states have legalized this controversial procedure. The states of Oregon and Washington allow their terminally ill residents to choose whether or not they have to suffer. Religious beliefs, moral beliefs, and ethical standards should not be forced upon a patient by anyone other than themselves. Every citizen has the right to autonomy and should be able to decide on their own how they want to live their life. Therefore, the Death with Dignity Act should be legalized in all 50 states.
The legalization of assisted suicide has been a controversial topic that has created a divide within the medical community, as well as the general public, for many years. Assisted suicide occurs when a patient decides to take their own life, with help from their doctor. The doctor can end the patient’s life without causing any additional pain or suffering. While some believe that assisted suicide should be legal for patients who are suffering from a terminal and painful condition, others argue that it is unethical and going against the doctor’s oath to help and not harm their patients. As the average life expectancy age increases, people are living longer while also having to live with more serious illnesses. As a result, lives are ending with a great amount of suffering and pain, rather then dying peacefully. Since death is ultimately inevitable, I will therefore argue in favor of the proposition that assisted suicide should be legal for those capable of making a rationale end of life decision.
People are probaly confused at the fact that society approving people to be euthanized. Obviously, if it was stated in a letter to the editor in the Detroit Free Press entitled, “Death, Dignity.” The writer is simply saying it’s okay to end lives. It also states that John Engler, our state government, is supporting two important projects that assist in these suicides. Engler is trying to establish Michigan to be a national leader in death with dignity (Death, Dignity). That doesn’t sound like dying with dignity to me. I think assisted suicide is wrong and we should take an account that killing yourself isn’t dignified.
Cotton, Paul. "Medicine's Position Is Both Pivotal And Precarious In Assisted Suicide Debate." The Journal of the American Association 1 Feb. 1995: 363-64.
The right to assisted suicide is an intricate topic posed upon those in the United States and several other countries throughout the world. Assisted suicide proposes a controversy of whether or not a person has a right to solicit death through the help of a licensed physician. This issue has sparked an intense moral controversy.
Kuhse, Helga. “Euthanasia.” A Companion to Ethics. Ed. Peter Singer. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 1991. 294-302. Print.
Larson, Edward J. & Co. “Legalizing Euthanasia Would Encourage Suicide” Euthanasia- Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. Carol Wesseker.