Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia

1641 Words4 Pages

When it comes to Euthanasia whether it’s looked at as the dignity to die or suicide, people don’t know whether it should stay illegal or be legalized. Some people believe it’s murder when it isn’t if you’re taking someone off of life support. Religions say it’s suicide when others will say that it’s stopping the pain because God doesn’t want us to suffer. There is also the doctor’s oath that they must follow which explains the rules of relationships between doctor and patient. Robert Latimer is one of the many relatives that have gone through dealing with someone with a disability illness, but he took action when there was nothing else they could do for his daughter and ended her life. When it comes to the case R. v. Latimer, we may accuse …show more content…

We may understand his reason if only we were in his situation or what if we were disabled. If something is suffering, we want them out of their misery because putting ourselves in their situation, we know that we wouldn’t want to be made to suffer until our last breath. Euthanasia should be legalized because we must not let people who are disabled and in excruciating pain to suffer until their last breath. Religion has a huge part in why people are against euthanasia. They believe that euthanasia is suicide. Euthanasia is a deliberate act undertaken by one person with the intention of ending the life of another person to relieve that person’s suffering where that act is the cause of death. Assisted suicide is providing another with the knowledge or means to intentionally end his or her own life; euthanasia is a deliberate action undertaken by one person with the intention of ending the life of another person to relieve that person’s suffering where that act is the cause of death. Though they may be ending their life, they’re doing it because they’re suffering either in pain or they have no means of living. …show more content…

Canada case was the revival because a group of Vancouver lawyers knew that the Sue Rodriguez case was not justified at all. Their main focus was section 241 of the Criminal Code which prohibits assisting another person to commit suicide. Through section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, there was a violation for every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection. There’s violation because a victim of an incurable illness such as Elayne Shapray who has MS. Gloria Taylor had seen these Vancouver lawyers taking on this action and contacted them because it was important to her. She wanted to have the legal right to die with dignity. Gloria Taylor became their Sue Rodriguez. In the Sue Rodriguez case, we only heard the voice of Sue Rodriguez, this case gave many the opportunity to have the Supreme Court of Canada to hear their voice. Section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms are also important because it states: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. The right not to be deprived of life can be looked at as the right to also take your life in your hands to be ended if disabled. What’s at stake is the real people suffering, we don’t know what they’re going through when they can’t communicate with us. When it is legalized in 2016, there would be laws applied to euthanasia. This

Open Document