Ethics And Morals In 'The Stranger' By Albert Camus

1481 Words3 Pages

Ethics and morals generally provide guidance to people’s lives as they tend to live accordingly. For the most part, that guidance is integrated into people through one 's experience, knowledge, and wisdom. Without both it would be nearly impossible for a human being to commit consistent and rational decisions with their lives. In the novel, The Stranger by Albert Camus, people witness the life of an absurdist, Meursault. Throughout Meursault’s life, he receives constant judgement for most of his actions; although, they could go either way as moral or immoral. Nevertheless, the final verdict is reached and Meursault loses his life for the way he decides to live it. Even though most of Meursault’s actions receive negative judgement, it 's not entirely to blame on Meursault. Furthermore, Meursault is not an …show more content…

Throughout all of Meursault’s actions at the funeral, most receive scrutiny especially his denial to see Maman before she was buried. Camus states, “When the caretaker asked if Meursault wanted to see his mother, Meursault responds with “I don’t know” (Camus 6). For whatever reason, Meursault was not consciously able to react appropriately at the moment. An expansion on Alonzo’s work in which supports Meursault would be the philosophy of Socrates and the Socratic paradox. Socrates states, “If one acts in a manner not conducive to one 's good then that person must have been mistaken (i.e., that person lacks the knowledge of how to obtain what was serviceable in that instance.”(Socrates 882). Even though Meursault did not understand his reasoning at the time, he didn’t know how to react in order to please the others. It’d be benign to assume he did not give a shit about Maman. Denying the request without reason and ultimately defying society, Meursault inevitably receives judgement from this point forward as an immoral

Open Document