Essay On Plea Bargaining

721 Words2 Pages

Plea bargaining is an arrangement made by both the prosecutors and defense attorneys to have the offender plead guilty to a charge accused of and expecting a lighter sentence than if the offender were to go to trial. A plea bargain is very common in most court cases due to the promise of some form of leniency. When an offender pleads guilty it is the prosecutor's duty to fulfill the promise they made to the offender. Plea bargaining is a long process that takes both parties of a case to agree on a sentence. A plea bargain is not if you are innocent or guilty, the deal is to plead “guilty” for the lesser charge.

Plea bargaining has its benefits from both parties of a case. A criminal offender may receive a lighter sentence than the maximum when accepting the plea bargain. Also, when a plea bargain is made it is good for the prosecutor's office and public …show more content…

Many offenders feel pressured into taking a plea bargain, when a prosecutor gives a plea bargain most of the time there is a problem with the case, and pleading guilty is on one's record forever whether they committed the crime or not. Although being guilty or innocent is important it is not the subject in a plea bargain. When an offender is offered the plea bargain sometimes they are either pressured into taking it by the prosecutor, public, family, or most of the time defense attorneys. When prosecutors offer plea bargains there are usually something wrong with the case for example they do not have enough evidence or the witness is not credible or present, sort of like the Kalief Browder case. In the Kalief Browder case there was no evidence and no credible witness which is why they offered a plea bargain lesser than the maximum if Kalief was to go to court. When an offender pleads guilty they are marked forever. A guilty plea can never be taken back or away, it remains on a person’s record

Open Document