A Reasoned Definition of the Term Globalisation Globalisation is an abstract concept. It does not refer to a concrete object, but to (an interpretation of) a societal process. Therefore the concept cannot be defined easily. For some, globalisation refers to Americanisation, for others it is about the growing importance of the world market, yet others use it to describe a cultural or an ideological reality: globalisation as the victory of 'market plus democracy'. For most authors, globalisation is a complex concept that involves political, economic and social-cultural changes.
Nationalism Final Question One Many different theoretical approaches exist to study the rise of nationalism throughout history. One approach is primordialism. Primordialism states that nationalism is a natural part of human beings. This field contends that distinct nations have existed since the dawn of time. Primordialism is also described as nationalism is created by people being surrounded by distinct cultural features like religion, custom, and language.
It may mean that it is one of many alternatives for stability, but not a principal that can be applied universally. Lastly the relationship between regionalism, globalisation and nationalism will be appraised as they are interacting with sovereign states and shaping world order. A region is a group of states or nations that have some kind of geographic proximity to each other, and usually a shared perception of belonging to the same community, with common values and history. As with many concepts in International Relations regionalism is not a universally agreed notion but these are some very basi... ... middle of paper ... ... regionalism-building well nigh impossible It is impossible to divide perfectly the world economy into little regional blocks that fit together. Regions are mostly constructs, defined by military, geopolitical and culture; they are not formed by economic development alone.
Modernization is a process whereby a community seeks to advance its technology and upgrade its beliefs, so to speak. However, this tactic is only widely-accepted if it does not interfere with traditions. Overall, imperialism shaped the history of several countries with the help of three concepts: a country’s sane patriotism capable of evolving into beliefs of superiority and discrimination of others, the economically effective yet greed-inducing capitalist system, and the beneficial but still invasive role of modernization.
Stalin has given a crystal clear definition of what is a nation. However, there is some more to add: A nation should also be based on a “shared culture ,” which helps create a person’s identity and political determination. To conclude, a nation not only determined by stability, history, economy but also culture, religion and ethnicity. What is nationalism? Nationalism is the idea of a sense of common identity to a particular geographical area.
Just like the importance of who we are, who we are as a nation is just as equally important. National Identity is all about the country as a whole encompassing its very culture, traditions, language, beliefs, and politics. < >. For many people national identity is very important and they take huge amount of pride in ones own country often giving a sense of responsibility and dedication. But how would you define an entire county, especial a country like Brazil with over 190 million people with so much cultural diversity.
This would pose a threat in times of either internal or external conflict, this aspect will lead states into becoming extremely vulnerable and fragile. The form nationalism and even strong nationalism are crucial to the wellbeing of the state. However, there is a thin line between nationalism/strong nationalism and Extreme nationalism. The concepts of Extreme nationalism impose, substantial negative effects to the state, mainly due to their hyper-nationalistic ideologies which are based in separatism. To conclude, nationalism is an integral part of providing both cohesion and development; however, in some cases nationalism can get too far and create a hyper-nationalistic population which believes in separatism which would ultimately harm the development and integration of the
Globalization often brings benefits at one level which cause negative effects at another, these results and the scale at which they manifest are often uncertain and unpredictable. The very nature of its unpredictability causes instability and introduces risks to all actors involved (many of these actors unwillingly). The economics of globalization is very relevant in understanding how processes work and how it affects other issues. Without the notion of a truly global economy many of the other consequences such as culture and politics would either cease to be sustained or become less threatening. In our modern world, finance and economics is the driving force behind globalization, and globalization is serving capitalism well.
“It is nationalism which engenders nations, and not the other way round.” Such words were written by prominent social anthropologist Ernest Gellner in his work Nations and Nationalism (1983). Nationalism can be defined as a person or group’s loyalty and support for their nation, whatever that nation may be. This brings to light a very troublesome and tortuous subject. Expressed simply as Nationalism, this being is very controversial, many hailing it as a propitious concept, while others putting it down and viewing it in animosity. But what is more controversial & more complex would be the establishment of such.
On the flip side, however, such a lens can also obscure the ability to enlarge understanding beyond that initial analysis. In this way, the strength of focus can become a weakness, setting one analytical approach as exclusively paramount, and inherently discrediting other approaches. This has often been the case with the disparate economic and feminist approaches to analyzing work and gender. A synthesis of the economic and feminist approaches, however, would provide a more complex, applicable, and efficient tool than the confrontational stance that often pervades discussion. The synthesis process would begin with realizing that, although both theories are extremely valuable methods of achieving an understanding of work, gender and society, neither theory provides a complete picture.