Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conspiracy theories surrounding moon landing essay
Moon landing was not a hoax
Research questions about apollo 11
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conspiracy theories surrounding moon landing essay
Moon landing true or false
It happened on 1969,most of America was watching .im going to be talking about the moon landing that they say happened.some people think it did happen, but some people thought it has been,is all fake.if you do think its real or fake I would like you to read the rest of my case. The moon landing some people says it happened some people say it didn't. i think the moon landing was fake .here are the main fakes you need to know,It happened in 1969.Neil Armstrong was one of the astronauts in the Apollo 11 spacecraft.Neil was the one who put the USA flag on the moon.so the USA and the soviet union where at a space fight to see who got to the moon first.so apperently we made it first but lets check
…show more content…
Which does not make sense because the only time they move it is when they put it in the moon. Fact number 5:the film in the cameras should have melted.the moon's surface gets very hot and the cameras the astronauts used the film should have melted they can't use the same gear they use for them self on a camera.If the put plastic around the camera it would still melt .so how did they take pictures. So I hope you think twice whether or not the moon landing was real or fake.It happened in 1969 we have the evidence for it was real or fake.So was it real or was it fake no one will know.But everyone has there own opinion ,and my opinion is that it was
Once the United States landed Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the moon, it was clear that the U.S. hoaxed the moon landing due to observations being viewed during the live footage of the moon landing. When watching the United States land on the moon, viewers claim to have watched the flag waving on live television. As known, there is no atmosphere in space or on the moon, so why should the flag be waving? NASA clai...
Villard, Ray. "Did NASA Fake the Moon Landing?." Astronomy. July 2004: 48-53. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 08 Apr. 2014
So, did NASA actually have enough technology to do this? Even though many Americans believe that the United States sent men to the moon in 1969, there are a few who believe that the moon landing was a hoax. A 1999 Gallup poll showed that 6% of Americans have doubts about the moon landing. Even though 6% of Americans doesn't sound like a lot, it translates to millions of people (Plait). It would have been easier to fake all the photographs in the Nevada desert in Area 51 than to actually perform the mission to the moon. However, NASA did indeed have the technology in the late 1960's to send men to the moon, and all the evidence they brought back proves it.
Some Americans now ask, "Was the moon landing a hoax?" Is this actually possible; would the U.S. government lie to our nation, let alone the whole world? The answer, no, should jump out. Hoax believers (HBs) thought they researched this thoroughly and gained enough evidence to prove that the moon landing was a hoax, but they don't know jack! Their whole case can be compared to a brick house with one difference. It seems like the bricks have all the corners, sides, and shape of a house. The evidence seems to be very strong, but the bricks are only one dimensional. All the "supposed" evidence crumbles after a little research. In this report I will show HBs falsified case along with the truth.
The Roswell UFO Crash In 1947 a UFO was seen near the town of Roswell, New Mexico. It was witnessed by many of the residents and was described as something not of this. planet. The world is a place. The government denies any evidence of this event occurring and has covered it up for many years.
With the naked eye you can see about 5,000 stars– unless it is daytime. During the day, the atmosphere surrounding the Earth scatters some of the light from the Sun. This scattered light is enough to completely outshine the tiny, little light from stars that are billions of billions of kilometers away. At night, when the Sun's light is completely blocked by earth, we have a mostly clear view at the stars. The Moon which lacks an atmosphere, is way different than the earth. Even during the day the sky is pitch black. The Sun's rays shine down not scattered to the Moon's surface. Conspiracy theorists ask, “why are stars not visible in photographs taken by the Apollo astronauts?” It all has to do with exposure time. Your usual photograph from the Apollo 11 landing shows an astronaut wearing a bright white spacesuit, some white equipment and several square kilometers of greyish and hilly landscape, all of it beneath a dark black sky. Compared to the amount of light falling on the camera from features on the surface, the incident light from the stars is also very tiny. If the camera had a long enough exposure time to capture enough light from the stars that they would be visible, then everything else in the image would be very overexposed and whited out. The Apollo landing took place during the lunar mornings, with the Sun shining very brightly. The stars are not bright
There are various reasons people have come up with to try and prove that the moon landing didn’t happen but they all have logical responses. NASA completed what President Kennedy promised six years after he was assassinated. The fact that all six moon landings happened under Nixon’s administration is how the cookie crumbled. People who believe the moon landing is a hoax is accusing NASA of pulling off something so much more complex than actually making it to the moon. We beat the USSR to the moon, there’s no actual proof to be able to deny
“It doesn’t help moon conspiracy theorist that not one person from the Apollo era’s 35,000 NASA employees or 200,000 contractors has ever stepped forward with “whistle-blowing “ insider testimony or ”smoking-gun” memos about a staged event.” (Villard) According to Ray Villard “NASA’s own actions are inconsistent without anyone would attempt to pull off a moon hoax.” (Villard) Let the debunking begin! Lets address the “Flapping” American flag first. Conspiracy theorists claim that the moon landing footage was filmed on a closed set because the movement of the flag suggests there is wind present and since the moon is in space there cannot be wind therefore it was hoaxed. According to NASA the flag was constructed specifically for the moons surface. A top wire runs through the fabric along top allowing it to stand erect like a wind swept flag on earth. The astronauts simply cause the flapping themselves by struggling to plant the flagpole into the ground and twisting it around. (Fuller) Next up, The “C” rock. A rock is seen in photographs and it appears to have the letter “C” “written or stamped on it, this gives off the impression that most of the rocks in the pictures from the moon landing are simply props.”(Fuller) scientists and representatives from NASA claim the “C” is just a photographic glitch–a stray hair that found its way into the developing process.” (Fuller) Considering the changing shadows, Villard puts it very well that “these claims prove only one thing–the conspiracy theorists know less about photography than a high school freshman joining the camera club. All Apollo images are absolutely accurate and consistent with the reality of a single, really bright light source–the Sun.” (Villard) When examining the conspiracy theory that duplicate backgrounds were used in the filming of the Apollo 11 moon landing, it is clear that the conspiracy
The most controversial moon landing was Apollo 11. This is the mission people have found the most “flaws” in. One problem people found in the photos is that you can’t see the stars in the background, so it must be fake. In reality, the moon’s surface reflects sunlight so the stars would have been drowned out and very hard to see. Another issue people seem to have with the Apollo 11 images is that the footprints made by the astronauts seem too perfect. The footprints seem this way because lunar dust is much finer than sand and other Earth substances making the footprints very detailed. A major bug people found was that no cameras are seen
I think the moon in landing in 1969 was real because of the rocks they got from the moon's surface and also because with a satellite image of the moon they say an image of tire marks on the surface. I know it could be a satellite or something but what are the chances of that going on that exact spot. And from one of the probes NASA sent up to the moon was found by the astronauts and brought back to NASA. People think that the rocks brought back from the moon was a meteorite from the moon but if it was how would they locate that if it was a meteoroid. And the meteoroid should have turned into dust and just have disappeared when it went into our orbit.
The moon was a wonder in the night sky over 238,000 miles away and many disbelieved that any earthly object could reach it. While most Americans were thrilled
The Roswell incident is one of the most publicized and well-known accounts of a possible UFO crash in the world. Perhaps the greatest evidence that a UFO did indeed crash near Roswell, is the wide scale military cover up that took place after the crash. This along with numerous eyewitness accounts of the crash site, prove that what ever happened in the summer of 1947, was certainly not a normal occurrence.
Three legs of all conspiracy theories about the Apollo XI are always the same; the lack of stars in images taken on the surface of the Moon, the fact that the installed there by astronauts flag seems to move and no crater was formed under the lander when it landed, something that should have happened to use your engine to ensure the landing. All of them, and some more, dismounted in the first program of 'skeptics', ETB series, presented after Luis Alfonso Gámez, who refuted many of pseudoscience and deceptions masquerading as science and irrefutable facts in today's society. The first one, he released the book 'We Never Went to the Moon', 1974 'on it in photos taken on the surface of the moon the stars are indistinguishable, explained by the same reason that no They are when we take pictures at night on Earth, and no, that our satellite has no atmosphere has nothing to do. On the Moon, its surface reflects the light reaching it from the Sun, which is in cameras the same effect as a flash; only you see what is in the foreground.
~"The 1969 Moon Landing: First Humans to Walk on Another World." Science and Its Times. Ed. Neil Schlager and Josh Lauer. Vol. 7. Detroit: Gale, 2001. U.S. History in Context. Web. 13 Feb. 2014.
The moon is the only natural satellite of Earth. The moon orbits the Earth from 384,400 km and has an average speed of 3700 km per hour. It has a diameter of 3476 km, which is about ¼ that of the Earth and has a mass of 7.35e22 kg. The moon is the second brightest object in the sky after the sun.