Essay On Latino Immigration

870 Words2 Pages

1. What issues that surround Latino immigration to America does each author address? In secondary source 1, John Richwine addresses the fact the Latinos are not like the Irish, the Italians or the Poles no matter the assumption of so many. Richwine argues that when the Latinos migrated over here they refused to assimilate or better their self’s like other immigrants have. He focused on and stated that even after second and third generations they didn’t seem to want to better their selves or become Americans. (“But even that view is overly optimistic, because of the second, larger problem with Hispanic assimilation: It appears to stall after the second generation. We see little further ladder-climbing from the grandchildren of Hispanic What comparisons does each author make to historical immigration groups? John Richwine used European Immigrants (the Irish, the Italians and the Poles) to compare the Latino immigration groups too. He compared how the Europeans came with no money and improved their selves through generations as opposed to the Latinos. (“Many of those Europeans came to America with no money and few skills, but their status steadily improved”). Leo Chaves compared his argument on the Latino Immigrants to the German language threat, the Catholic threat, the Chinese and Japanese immigration threats, and the southern and eastern European threat. Chaves states Latino immigrants are not like the European threat in that that have ancestral roots here and have a completely different agenda for being here. (Latinos have been in what is now the United States since the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, predating the English colonies. Since the Mexican-American War, immigration from Mexico and other Latin countries has waxed and waned, building in the early twentieth century, diminishing in the 1930s, and building again the post-1965 Based on what you have learned, what examples from American history can you think of that would support or refute each author 's argument? As the European immigrants were flowing into this country they were largely unskilled, poor and did not speak English. They were, however, hardworking and more than willing to become Americans in almost every way and had the desire to grow and succeed. They did at first segregate themselves into groups, Irish, Pols, Germans, Italian etc.., until the time they started to become more financially independent which allowed growth into better jobs and into more Americanized housing. This process of course took time and within a few generations they were considered Americans and had assimilated into modern society. One thing to keep in mind was the fact that when European immigrants were flowing into the US they had to undergo immigration processes that at that time allowed them to become legal in this country, some did still come in illegally, however. A large number of Mexican immigrants here in this country are technically here for a better life free of an oppressive government still, they are not bettering their lives compared to the American standards of living and are considered to be living as low-class citizens for the most part. They are hardworking and mostly unskilled labors and like the Europeans willing to do jobs no one else wants to do. But unlike the Europeans, most are not undergoing the immigration process needed to

Open Document