Essay On Corrosion Safety

2250 Words5 Pages

The University of Western Australia

Table of Contents
1. Case identification 2
1.1 Material specification 2
1.2 Manufacturing Process 3
1.3 Sea water 3
2. Case analysis 3
2.1 Crevice corrosion: 4
2.2 Pitting corrosion: 4
2.3 Corrosion in weldments 5
3. Recommendations: 5
4. Conclusion: 6
5. References 7
6. Appendix -A. 9
7. Appendix-B (Project Plan) 11
8. Appendix- C (Self evaluation) 12

1. Case identification
The specimen we selected for our case study analysis was a temporary fence found lying near a construction site that was waiting to be erected. This construction site was located opposite to the beach. Fences used in coastal region are more vulnerable to corrosion compared to those used inland, hence the fence wire contained mixture of aluminum and zinc, as a zinc/aluminum fence will last up to four times longer than the galvanized steel wire. This fence had these corrosion protection measures in place however it corroded extensively. The environment in the surrounding area had strong wind gusts, humidity and salinity.
The majority of the corrosion was found on the supporting structure which appears to be painted low carbon steel, moisture has found its way through the paint barrier and the fence has subsequently corroded. For better protection against corrosion Australian standards specify low carbon steel tubing hot dipped with galvanized zinc and Aluminum alloy, whereas the wire was made of steel. Another option to consider is to keep the fence in a non-coastal environment; the fence was located just opposite the coast in a region where winds are strong and contains vaporized sea water. The sea water is an electrolytic substance which enables current to be carried because of ions in the salt and other chemicals dis...

... middle of paper ...

...ommence editing of report
2/04/14 1pm-2pm Complete editing of report, attempt to finish compiling of report
4/04/14 5pm-6pm Full technical report completion of case study
7/04/14 Submit Report for marking
Total Meeting Minutes: approx. 600 minutes

8. Appendix- C (Self evaluation)
Evaluator: Vignesh Manoharan (21431834)
Name Evaluation Percentage
Gurpinder Singh Gill 25
Vignesh Manoharan 25
Yunos Mutahar 25
Osam Abdul Salam 25

Evaluator: Gurpinder Singh Gill (21528312)
Name Evaluation Percentage
Gurpinder Singh Gill 25
Vignesh Manoharan 25
Yunos Mutahar 25
Osam Abdul Salam 25

Evaluator: Yunos Mutahar (20754763)
Name Evaluation Percentage
Gurpinder Singh Gill 25
Vignesh Manoharan 25
Yunos Mutahar 25
Osam Abdul Salam 25

Evaluator: Osam Abdul Salam (20912653)
Name Evaluation Percentage
Gurpinder Singh Gill
Vignesh Manoharan
Yunos Mutahar
Osam Abdul Salam

Open Document