preview

Essay On Assisted Suicide

analytical Essay
2917 words
2917 words
bookmark

LEGALIZATION OF ASSISTED SUICIDE IN THE U.S. Currently, physician-assisted suicide or death is illegal in all states except Oregon, Vermont, Montana and Washington. Present law in other states express that suicide is not a crime, but assisting in suicide is. Supporters of legislation legalizing assisted suicide claim that the moral right to life should encompass the right to voluntary death. Opponents of assisted suicide claim that society has a moral and civic duty to preserve the lives of innocent persons. There is a slippery slope involving the legalizing assisted suicide. Concern that assisted suicide allowed on the basis of mercy or compassion, can and will lead to the urging of the death for morally unjustifiable reasons is understandable. However, legalization can serve to prevent the already existent practice of underground physician-assisted suicide if strict laws to ensure that the interests of the patients are primary are installed and enforced. When a patient asks for assistance in dying, their wishes should be respected as long as the patient is free from coercion and competent enough to give informed consent. The intent of this work is to examine the legalization of assisted suicide in Oregon and the Netherlands and to argue that assisted suicide is morally and ethically acceptable in theory despite some unintended consequences of its implementation. The Oregon Death With Dignity Act allows Oregon residents the access to physician-assisted death with restrictions. An eligible patient must be at least 18 years of age, diagnosed with a terminal illness resulting death within 6 months, and be in the right psychological state to make informed, rational decisions. The Death With Dignity Act implemented a protocol physici... ... middle of paper ... ...tonomy. The law can require the medical opinions of several physicians and psychiatrists to formulate the most rational decision. In addition, waiting periods and consent from an individual close to the patient can be proscribed to prevent the patient from making decisions he or she will regret. All states that implement the legalization of assisted suicide must also limit the procedure to terminal illness only. Safeguards are vital, but every state must also devote resources toward oversight of the procedure. The role of the state government is to legalize, but not the program like in the Netherlands; the state should seek to improve the field of palliative care by promoting counseling and hospices. The purpose of legalizing physician-assisted death is not necessarily to promote the process as the optimal choice. Legalization will provide patients with an option

In this essay, the author

  • Examines the legalization of physician-assisted suicide in oregon and the netherlands and argues that assisted suicide is morally and ethically acceptable in theory despite some unintended consequences.
  • States that the oregon death with dignity act allows oregon residents the access to physician-assisted death with restrictions. the patient must be at least 18 years of age, diagnosed with a terminal illness, and be in the right psychological state to make informed, rational decisions.
  • Opines that the oregon division of health must expand their infrastructure to accommodate the death with dignity act.
  • Explains that the death with dignity act is a catalyst into improving end-of-life care in general among oregon medical practitioners.
  • Compares the situation of assisted suicide in the netherlands with oregon's, stating that terminal illness is not a requirement.
  • Argues that the dutch government's failure to enforce its own law causes the exploitation of patients by private organizations.
  • Explains that four themes consistently appear in arguments against legalization: the belief in the sanctity of life dictates that death can only happen naturally; the third theme is concerned with the powers allocated to patients and physicians.
  • Argues that the slippery slope theory portrays only a possible picture; it does not necessarily portray the likely picture.
  • Explains that those against the legalization of assisted suicide fear that it would lead to a greater risk for potential mistakes and physician abuses of power.
  • Analyzes how the new england journal of medicine studied the effects of legalization in oregon between 1997 and 1999 and found that the abuse claims made by opponents are not supported.
  • Analyzes how the study disproves the sentiment that physicians abuse power by presenting assisted death as a primary option.
  • Argues that the legalization of physician-assisted suicide is unnecessary if proper palliative care is available. opponents of assisted death fail to consider that eradication of physical pain does not necessarily eliminate suffering.
  • Argues that physician-assisted suicide is an appropriate policy that allows for patient autonomy. propaganda portraying physicians as corrupt is misleading and simply erroneous.
  • Argues that it is paternalistic to prevent legalization out of fear that individuals cannot make rational decisions. the oregon death with dignity act is reasonably successful in protecting both human life and autonomy.
Get Access