Enlightened Rulers Dbq

486 Words1 Page

It was seen throughout the 1700's many rulers wanted to be considered an enlightened ruler. Out of the many who wanted to be considered only a few can truly be considered truly enlightened rulers. An enlightened ruler would be considered a ruler who not only supported and spoke of enlightened ideas, but implement the ideas. There was a range of the level of enlightened rulers during the 1700’s, which can be seen with rulers like Joseph II and Catherine the Great. These rulers can be considered complete opposites in the idea of the enlightened ruling.
Joseph II can be considered the best example of an enlightened monarch in Europe during the 1700’s. Joseph II was someone who wanted to promote education, toleration of other religions, and wanted to be an advocate of the free press. During his rule, Joseph II enacted many reforms, through royal decrees, which were all seen as overwhelming due to the immense number. Joseph II abolished serfdom during his rule and promoted new forms of agriculture and production for the economy. With all of the reforms made, it was very confusing and very hard to follow what was happening, with the succeeding rule, all reforms were reversed, No progress was made, but people saw what a true enlightened ruler was like. …show more content…

Frederick II of Prussia can more be considered an enlightened absolutist, who often called himself the "first servant of the state." Throughout his rule, he attempted to reform the legal system, though the reforms were very limited, in Prussia by ending capital punishment. Along with the ending of capital punishment he favored the idea of religious toleration and agricultural reforms. Even though the ideas were favored, Frederick II of Prussia did not follow through with them. During the rule of Frederick II of Prussia the military grew at a rapid amount, and by the end of his rule, the military was at around 200,000

Open Document