Ending World: A Comparative Analysis

622 Words2 Pages

An article by Food and Agriculture of the United Nations stated that “roughly one-third of the food produced in the world (1.3 billion tons) for human consumption every year gets wasted.” In the articles “America is saving tons of food, thanks to a student volunteer's great idea” by The Washington Post, “Opinion: Ending world hunger by stopping food waste in the fields” by Bjorn Lomborg, Project Syndicate, and “Would you eat food made with ‘trash?’” by Emily Matchar, the authors introduce different ways society can annul food waste worldwide. Although others may disagree, it is clear that there are many ways to excise food waste worldwide such as using a food tracker app, increasing the efficiency of food production, and practicing food conversion. To begin, an app that allows pantries to share extra food can help prevent the loss of food. In “America is saving tons of food, thanks to a student volunteer's great idea” by The Washington Post, it claims, “Pantries simply post their leftover food to the program and someone else in the network picks it up and puts it to use.” The use of this app showcases how …show more content…

In the text, “Opinion: Ending world hunger by stopping food waste in the fields” by Bjorn Lomborg, it states, “Today, only $5 billion is spent annually on research to improve the seven major global food crops. Just one-tenth of that is targeted to help small farmers in Africa and Asia. Investing an extra $88 billion in agricultural research and development over the next 15 years would increase food yields an additional 0.4 percent each year.” This excerpt conveys that people are already changing their stances and beginning to think about how to prevent food waste in the first place rather than attempting to fix the problem later. If people start thinking about production first rather than belittling it, then losses could be avoided or dealt with more

More about Ending World: A Comparative Analysis

Open Document