Emile Durkheim Theory

533 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Emile Durkheim influence in modern

Emile Durkheim was one of the earliest social theorists in France during the late 1800’s. Emile Durkin is both important and interesting for the field of sociology because of his attentiveness to moral and religious phenomena. In fact Edward A. Tiryakian (1964) suggested that Durkheim is in to be held to the same esteem as Max Weber and Sigmund Freud. “Max Weber, Sigmund Freud, and Emile Durkheim – certainly three towering figures of modern social thought – seem to have been concerned with three fundamental objects of inquiry which when examined closely enough turn out to be, interestingly to note, facets of the same phenomenon”.
Emile Durkheim was born David Emile Durkheim on April 15th 1858 in Epinal, a capital city in the eastern French providence of Lorraine. Emile was born into a family who had significant religious background. His family had a long line of multigenerational rabbis including his father, grandfather, and great grandfather. Because of this one could only assume that it was thought that Emile would become a rabbi as well.
According to Lewis A. Coser (1977...

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Max Weber's The Protestant Ethic And The Spirit Of Capitalism

    1808 Words  | 4 Pages

    In contrast, Durkheim’s social methodology relied on the treatment of social facts as objective facts (Durkheim in Calhoun 2012: 201), discounting subjective interpretation. He emphasized that social facts exist prior to thoughts, in other words, social facts existed before being defined and judged, and were produced organically. Under his methodology, social scientists were to observe the essence of these social facts directly, before eliminating traditional and general values in any attempt to study the

    Read More

  • The Criticism Of Ralph Waldo Emerson

    2180 Words  | 5 Pages

    Ralph Waldo Emerson was born in Boston in 1803. He was a son of a Unitarian minister and the descendant of a New England clergyman. This led him to become a minister himself and later quit to focus on his philosophy called transcendentalism. Emerson started writing in his youth and later attended Harvard University. After graduating from Harvard in 1821, he taught in a women's school.

    Read More

  • The Social Theory Of Karl Marx And Emile Durkheim

    624 Words  | 2 Pages

    Society, in simplest terms, is defined as a group of people who share a defined territory and a culture. In sociology, we take that definition a little further by arguing that society is also the social structure and interactions of that group of people. Social structure is the relatively enduring patterns of behavior and relationships within a society, not only between its members, but also with social institutions. According to those definitions, society seems a fairly concrete concept to comprehend. However, there are sociologists whom have their own theories about society in the aspects of the relationship between social classes, and class conflict. The German philosopher, economist and theorist Karl Marx has a fragmented and rather disconsolate view on society; while French functionalist and theorist Emile Durkheim looks at society more scientifically and wholesomely. Despite these profound differences of outlook, however, Marx and Durkheim were both centrally concerned with the emergence of modern capitalism, and in particular with the rise of the modern system of the division ...

    Read More

  • Durkheim's Conception Of Social Theories

    1200 Words  | 3 Pages

    SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY Take Home Exam One Questions 5 and 6 By Shylynn E. Calbert MW 5:45-7pm DR. FORD 5. Discuss abortion using applications of Durkheim?s conception of social facts. How would Durkheim research the issue and explain it in sociological terms?

    Read More

  • Karl Marx And Durkheim

    2731 Words  | 6 Pages

    Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim are considered the founding fathers of sociology and both had profound influence on the development of sociology. However, some may say that they differ dearly in their views about society. Although there are differences in outlooks between the two, one thing noticeable is Marx and Durkheim shared the same concern over society and its development. They were both, in particular concerned with the rise of the modern system of division of labour and the evolution of market society taking place in the domain of modern capitalism. Both approached these developments by introducing a theory of their own to shed light on the effects that modern capitalism had on solidarity and on society’s ability to reproduce itself. More so, to understand and solve the problems arose as the societies in which they lived moved from a pre-industrial to an industrial state. For Marx, one of the serious problems arose in this was what he termed alienation. On the other, for Durkheim it was what he called anomie. The purpose of this essay is to examine the underlying differences of these two notions and in hope that it may help us to better understand the different visions of society developed by these two great social thinkers. Firstly, we start off with Marx’s idea of alienation. Secondly, what anomie means to Durkheim. Then a comparison will be done on the two concepts, evaluating the similarities and differences between the two. Lastly, we will finally come to conclude how the concept of alienation differs from the concept of anomie.

    Read More

  • The Sociological Framework of Harriet Martineau

    1004 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the framework of classical sociological theory, numerous sources, including Ritzer, investigate this brave new world of unified science and empirical foundation. They are moving amidst the "theory park" of speculative philosophical systems in sociology and yet they are turning to theoretical applications such as elementarist, holistic, and interactionist approaches. This technique is employed in order to make classical social theory more meaningful and to better engage theory with useful research (Sandywell, p. 607).

    Read More

  • Emile Durkheim and The Science of Sociology

    1278 Words  | 3 Pages

    Emile Durkheim was born in France in April of 1858 and died in November of 1917. He was from a close Jewish community that he continued to be close to even after breaking with the Jewish church. Having come from a long family line of rabbis, he had planned to follow in that profession. Durkheim was known as the Father of Sociology. He was a liberal, a modernist, and a nationalist. He was a very ambitious man; this ambition was illustrated by the accomplishments he made over the course of his life.

    Read More

  • Religion: The Father Of Religion, By Emile Durkheim

    1187 Words  | 3 Pages

    Emile Durkheim, regarded as the father of sociology, worked roughly during the same period of time as Tylor and Frazer. However, despite their timely similarities, Durkheim claims that humanity will not outgrow religion. Durkheim differs from Tylor and Frazer because he considers religion and science to have separate purposes for humanity. For this reason, he affirms that science will not be the force through which religion becomes outgrown. To explain, Durkheim suggests that unlike science, “[r]eligion’s true purpose is not intellectual, but social” (Pals: Nine Theories, 102). The social function of religion manifests itself as it “serves as the carrier of social sentiments providing symbols and rituals that enable people to express the deep

    Read More

  • Comparing Weber's and Durkheim's Methodological Contributions to Sociology

    1739 Words  | 4 Pages

    Comparing Weber's and Durkheim's Methodological Contributions to Sociology This essay will be examining the methodological contributions both Durkheim and Weber have provided to sociology. It will briefly observe what Positivists are and how their methodologies influence and affect their research. It will also consider what interpretative sociology is, and why their type of methodology is used when carrying out research. It will analyse both Durkheim's study of Suicide and also Webers study of The Protestant work ethic, and hopefully establish how each methodology was used for each particular piece of research, and why. Emile Durkhiem, in sociology terminology is considered to be a Functionalist, in addition to also being a Positivist, however, strictly speaking, Durkheim was not a Positivist.

    Read More

  • Auguste Comte: The Father Of Sociology, By Auguste Comte

    733 Words  | 2 Pages

    Auguste Comte was born in the late eighteenth century. His family was devout Catholic’s, and enforced their religion onto him as a young child. Comte is viewed as a Positivistic- Organic theorist, and is known as the ‘Father of Sociology’. When Comte became older he began to turn his back on Catholicism. He was heavily influenced by Henri Saint- Simon, and Adam Smith. After working with Saint- Simon they had a falling out. Comte was married for a short time and referred to his marriage as a “domestic anchorage” (Coser, 17).

    Read More

  • Social Theories In The 19th And Early Twentieth Century

    524 Words  | 2 Pages

    The social conditions that people lived in, in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were of the greatest significance of the production of sociology, the different problems and social disorder that resulted from the series of political revolutions escorted in by the French Revolution in 1789 distressed many early social theorists, when they eventually came to the conclusion that it was impossible to return to the old order , they wanted to find new sources of order in societies that had been disturbed by the different dramatic political changes.

    Read More

  • Functionalism And Religion Essay

    1620 Words  | 4 Pages

    Durkheim is a key figure in understanding religion from a functionalist perspective. He believes that social order and stability can only exist if people are integrated into society by value consensus. Religion is seen as an important institution for achieving these functions as it sets a moral code for

    Read More

  • Comparing and Contrasting Sociological Theorists Max Weber, Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx

    1584 Words  | 4 Pages

    Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx, and Max Weber are all important characters to be studied in the field of Sociology. Each one of these Sociological theorists, help in the separation of Sociology into its own field of study. The works of these three theorists is very complex and can be considered hard to understand but their intentions were not. They have their similarities along with just as many of their differences.

    Read More

  • Emile Durkheim and Max Weber Comparison

    477 Words  | 1 Pages

    Emile Durkheim and Max Weber both appealed to me in the reading of chapter 1. They both have similarities and differences on their approaches to sociology. While reading the background of Emile, I found it fascinating how he studied sociology in a way that he put together the individual dimensions and added them together to better understand a society or social group. The case of suicide rates and religion. This one case can be analyzed through other elements, such as careers. For instance, the type of profession can be studied. I am really into statistics and like to break down information. The way he broke down the information to analyze a society or social groups interested me. Max Weber, I chose to write about because I felt he had a refined understanding of his teacher, Karl Marx.

    Read More

  • Talcott Parson and Ronert Merton: Structural Functionalism

    625 Words  | 2 Pages

    Talcott Parsons have some of the same views of sociology as Durkheim, he believed that social life is categorized by social cooperation. Parsons also believed that commitment to common values maintains or...

    Read More

More about Emile Durkheim Theory

Open Document