Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of communication between parents and child
Challenges of good communication between parents and children
Challenges of good communication between parents and children
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Paul Tomburro from CraveOnline has conducted research and surveys revealing the following: “78% - Parents who admitted they had logged into their child's social media account to check their messages” Consequently, technological advancement has pushed parents to resort to spying on their children because they want to keep up with them. Although spying can bring to light who their child really is and how they act when their parents aren’t around, it can easily cross the line of privacy and respect between parent and child. As the communication between the parent and child weaken, the more parents feel as if they are losing control of their kid and become paranoid and result to spying. However the solution is oddly simple, the parent just needs …show more content…
Unfortunately, parents have who resort and rely on spyware start becoming distant from their children. As Ellen Goodman states in her article Big Brother Meets Big Mother, “As someone who has done my fair share of speed dialing, I am a believer in the text messaging and cell phone that keeps parents and kids in contact. But there's a moment when the two-way tools of communication turn into the one-way tools of surveillance.” Goodman reasons parents who text or call their kid to check up on them to ensure their safety have a better relationship since they communicate. However, Goodman is also declaring parents who use spy-ware often lose communication with their kid and with the vital factor of communication being lost an unhealthy relationship is bound to happen. As it can be seen, the parents who do use spy-ware have to be in constant check so they don’t cross the fine line of monitoring and sneakily spying. Equally important to realize is, parents are just trying to keep their kids safe, however they can still do such a task by just speaking about what they are so afraid of so their kid understands and avoids Internet danger. As Donna St. George says in her article Parents Investigated, “ 'We’re not saying parents should abandon all caution. We’re saying parents should pay attention to risks that are …show more content…
In the terms of trying to keep teens safe from Internet dangers, spyware won’t solve the problem. As a matter of fact, spyware will only make the teen paranoid of their parent and they won’t understand why the Internet can be dangerous. For instance, the evidence claims "There's always a parent on speed dial." Teens are never really on their own. We may be protecting them right out of the ability to make their own decisions. Including their own mistakes.” (Ellen Goodman #10) Goodman reasons using excessive amounts of surveillance, will result in teens who will not truly learn independence nor how to take safety precautions on their own. However, some might argue spyware can prevent mistakes and believe their teens will naturally choose what’s the worst for them. Goodman even states, “...says, if you are not monitoring, you are a bad parent.” (big brother big mother, paragraph 10) However, their argument proves to have a false dilemma in the argument because they say, if you are not monitoring your teen then you are a bad parent which is false because there are more options to being a good parent and bad parent. The accusation towards parents is, if they aren’t monitoring then they are bad parents proves to be false because it is usually the monitoring parents
Internet is advancing every day, parents have no idea what their kids are doing in cyberspace and are contemplating the idea of spyware. In the article, “The Undercover Parent” by Harlan Coben, he argues the idea of parents putting spyware on kids’ computer is a good idea to keep the child safe. Many American parents have no idea what happens in cyberspace; sex, bullying, and drugs. Parents are torn between protecting their child with spyware and allowing the child to have privacy. Coben uses his friends’ personal experiences to support his argument without leaving room for counterarguments. By using strong emotional appeals, weak qualifiers, and sugary word choice Coben creates a weak argument that lacks persuasion.
Harlan Coben’s essay “The Undercover Parent” attempts to enlighten readers, specifically parents, of the benefits to installing spyware onto their children’s computers in order to keep record of their child’s online activity. Whilst admitting at first he was not particularly keen on spyware himself, Coben aims to persuade his audience of the benefits by highlighting the dangers of children using the internet unsupervised and without boundaries. However, Coben fails to supply factual evidence to back up his claims, all while stating a number of contradictions within his own arguments. Coben states, “…overprotective parents fight their kids’ battles on the playground, berate coaches about playing time and fill out college applications…” (19). This is a weak argument because it inadvertently suggests that overprotectiveness
“Do you wish you’d grown up with your mom tracking your every move? If not don’t do it to your own kid.” states Lenore Skenazy in her persuasive article Tracking Kids like Felons. These words draw an immediate comparison to “the golden rule” or “treat others how you want to be treated.” In this article Skenazy evaluates a personal-tracking app called FamilySignal. As the readers we see the author’s take on this specific point in the very first sentence when she uses sarcasm on the word “safe.” Skenazy does not give too many facts but she does base most of her article off of morals, which may even be more persuasive. Even in today’s day and age tracking ones every step is definitely not ok, even with the advanced technology that we have.
The expansion of the Internet infrastructure across the world, has brought an increased audience. Which has provided expanded markets for businesses and exploited new opportunities. There are virtually countless social sites and media used by individuals to access and share experiences , content, insights, and perspectives. Parents today tend to believe they should spy on their kids online activity. I argue parents should respect the privacy of a child's social life and his/her internet activity.
Lily Huang author of Protect the Willfully Ignorant states “An increasingly urgent question of privacy or how best to keep your public plot walled in” (474). Most internet users savvy or not, are aware of the potential risks. Most people know the potential risk for permanency and of the pictures or information we put out on social networks or other sites and the content being seen. We have all heard the warnings since grammar school from everyone about the internet and how to use it. Teachers, parents, librarians and school inundate our children all throughout school about information on safe usage. To be aware of predators and such is common knowledge. Why the need for laws to protect childrens’ privacy, and usage against exploitation? Similar reasons to why we wear seatbelts while driving and it is enforced by law. We all want our freedoms not to be infringed but at what cost and to who? We are aware of the statistics and outcomes of auto accidents without seatbelts and the need “to protect the willfully ignorant” (Huang). Lily Huang discussed consumer’s lack of expertise for making the best privacy decisions and how important default privacy settings are on social networks (475).
In conclusion, it is important that parents give their freedom to make sure kids learn to be independent and now days most teens spend a lot of their time in the internet so by parents not letting them have their privacy there, they are taking over all their lives without even giving them a chance to “explored their identity and the world” like Boyd mention. Parents, need to realize that by over protecting their kids is like sending them to war without weapons because they will not know how to confront the world and worst of all they will not know they things they are capable of doing by themselves.
Some will say that if tennagers know that they are being watched they will be more cautious. Teenagers will find other ways of communicating to their friends like text messages or cell phones and those options are better because they do not offer the anonymity and danger of the internet. Also some will say that teenagers can block the content that they are watching from their parents. If parents talked to their children about why they are installing spyware and the dangers of the internet it can prevent all of this. Installing spyware in your children’s computer is not meant to be an invasion of privacy it is just meant to help monitor what our children are
In an article titled, “The Undercover Parent”, by Harlan Coben he states that he also agrees with Spyware. One example of this is when he states, “we all know about the young boy unknowingly conversing with a pedophile.” This really stuck to me because it states unknowingly. The kid didn’t know what he was doing. This is an example of why kids need Spyware.
In the article “Undercover Parent” by Harlan Coben, written March 16th 2008 in the New York Times, Coben states parents should consider putting spyware in their children’s computers and monitoring what their teens are doing on the internet. What is spyware may you ask? Spyware is a software that can be installed on a computer to watch every keystroke someone may make. This allows parents to watch every snapchat, tweet, Instagram post and every conversation your teen ever has over the internet.
While not always seen, overall, teenagers get far less privacy than adults do. Between schools checking through the belongings of their students without solid evidence to allow it, or parents monitoring the activity of their children online, teenagers today are subject to much of their privacy being taken away. It is true that this can sometimes be helpful in busting drug dealers or keeping teenagers from getting involved with bad habits online. However, it can also have an adverse effect, ruining the relationship between a parent and his or her child, or other relationships throughout the rest of the teenager’s life. Teenagers should be allowed more privacy, if not as much as adults have, as it will keep them less fearful, as well as help to keep their interpersonal relationships strong and their emotions in a good state.
¨The Undercover Parent¨ by Harlan Coben, published in an online newspaper ¨New York Times¨ (16 March 2008), claims that the Internet is dangerous for kids. Harlan Coben explains how spyware could be a resource that keeps track of our kids’ internet use, but how it could also invade sons’ and daughters’ privacy. He also claims that parents should have conversations about their concerns with teens, and let them know spyware is a possibility. In my opinion, I quite agree and do not agree with the most of it.
New iPhone-applications such as “teen tracker” and “MamaBear” appear to be quite useful for parents. These applications are capable of tracking the adolescent’s locations on a map and therefore make the parents know where their kids are at every moment. Additionally they activate the phone’s camera, for recording audio and video, respectively. Dr. Keith Ablow, who is a psychiatrist, has a relatively negative perspective on these apps, as they can cause implications. He says among other things that it is a license for teenagers to not to be responsible for what they do, and for their parents so they can see what their kids are doing, and not be concerned about their behavior. According to Dr. Keith Ablow, we have to get back to a place where people actually communicate and where you are capable of looking your teenager in the eye and know whether we are dealing with a responsible individual or not. He, however, states that under certain circumstances it may be okay for parents to use these apps.
...as people should have their privacy when surfing the internet. Alternatively, the evidence suggests that the government can help tackle terrorism and stop bullying. After examining this issue closely, surely society could not argue that we should protect our country and our children by monitoring social networking sites?
However, sensitive information that may be shared might later embarrass the children as they grow older and realize what is available on the internet. Such events may result in resentment and misunderstandings on both the children and the parents’ sides. According to Steinberg (2017) in “Sharenting: Children’s Privacy in the Age of Social Media,” there have been long-term issues and conflicts regarding parental sharing and whether children have the right to control what is shared about them. Another long-term problem raised by parental sharing is the idea of data collecting. Per “Children’s Privacy in the Big Data Era: Research Opportunities,” “These trends raise serious concerns about digital dossiers that could follow young people into adulthood, affecting their access to education, employment, healthcare, and financial services. Although US privacy law provides some safeguards for children younger than 13 years old online, adolescents are afforded no such protections” (Montgomery, Chester, & Milosevic, 2017, p.
These individuals feel that it is an invasion of the teenagers’ right to privacy and the development of their trustworthiness. Kay Mathieson states “only by giving children privacy will they come to see their thoughts as something that belongs to them – to which they have an exclusive right.” In the United States and according to the law, monitoring the internet usage of a minor does not break any laws and is a moral obligation of the parent. Trustworthiness is an important development of a child to learn in order to develop genuine relationships with others in the lifetime. “Not only does monitoring have the great potential to undermine the trust of the child in the parent, and thus to undermine trust in others more generally, it also has the potential to undermine the capacity of the child to be worth of trust” (Mathieson). If the parent has not already had conversations with the teenager about monitoring internet usage and the parent is not telling the child about the monitoring, there is already an issue with the development of trustworthiness in the teenager. There was already a failure of development of this skill before the internet or internet monitoring was introduced.