Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/220821000?accountid=9720 Silfen, E. (2006). Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: An evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 24(6), 664-78. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2006.02.005
First, what antiquated technologies is health care are still using, what new tech are they exploring, and then what security problems are we opening up and what is this all costing. Some antiquated tech includes fax machines, paper(yes still), and pagers which until I entered health care did not know you cou... ... middle of paper ... ...uys out. In conclusion, a warning, technology is there to guide and help a physician it is not, nor has it ever been intended to replace the physician patient relationship. Works Cited Chun-Ju Hsiao, P. a. (2014, January 17).
Abstract This report explores Breaching Trust in Medicine and more specifically Doctor-Patient Confidentiality. We will discuss the parameters of confidentiality in medical practice, including how it is defined and why it is essential for the both the heath of the patient and the public health. We will evaluate how breaches of confidentiality are regulated, looking at particular cases as well as the circumstances where doctors can divulge patient information. Introduction Trust is a vital part of the doctor patient relationship. Physician trust has great implications because it is needed for the effective care of a single patient as well as for the general health of the public.
In most cases privacy and security risks apply to both paper and electronic records. With the growing demand for the electronic health record (EHR) system, the transfer from paper to electronic can be risky. For this project we were asked to compare and contrast the security issues between maintenance of paper medical records and the EHR system, also we were asked to discuss what requirements and issues need to be considered when doing a conversion to an EHR. Inappropriate access is one of the most common ways a patient’s record is at risk. In paper records the risk could happen by a non-authorized person achieving access to record storage areas or finding records left wide open on a counter.
An electronic health record is an electronic means of documenting a patient’s procedures, diagnosis, billing information, etc. at each care facility (Badzek & Gross, 1999). A movement that was first initiated under the Bush administration, accepted by the Clinton administration, and now embraced by President Obama is the creation of the individual electronic medical record. In 2009 President Obama included $36 billion in the stimulus package to... ... middle of paper ... ...n%20age/315,000%20patients%27%20information%20disappears%20from%20Emory%20Healthcare%20_%20www.wsbtv.com.htm Dixon, P. MEDICAL IDENTITY THEFT: The Information Crime that Can Kill You, March 3, 2006. World Privacy Forum.
Commenting on the regulations, the President commented, “for the first time, patients will have full access to their medical records and more control over how their personal information will be used and disclosed.”  These regulations apply well to the physical world of health care, but when taken in the context of Web-based care, they become ambiguous, and even misleading, and fail to comprehensively protect privacy. President Bush’s move to implement the rules was a sur... ... middle of paper ... ... 1. The Denver Post. November 20, 2001 Tuesday. First Edition.
Privacy protections for medical records present a regulatory nightmare. Medical records are critical to quality care since they give a doctor a patient's history; they are key to preventing dangerous drug interactions, complications from allergies, and harmful drug side effects. Medical records also play a key role in medical and health system research. The information in a patient's medical records, however, can be used for much more insidious purposes; denial of medical care, denial of employment, character assassination, and extortion are all consequences of medical information falling into the wrong hands. The difficulty of balancing these needs has resulted in a thin patchwork of regulatory protection of medical information; as one commentator has noted, federal law protects video rental records more thoroughly and completely than medical records.
The increasing database storage is turning the research from relying on the patients directly, but rather concentrating on the records available for the studies. However, this aspect is not clearly featured in the Common Rule and hence the concern of privacy and trust of the handling the information comes in. introduction of the HIPAA rules brings some cohesion in this sector. This is because there is now a definition of circumstances on which a patient’s information may be shared to researchers. Subsequent regulations have only been building on HIPAA privacy rules.
Also, the reasons for deception must be to prevent psychological distress, and its execution must have a high chance of success so that the patient-doctor relationship will not suffer from a break in trust. Overall, doctors should always strive to respect autonomy and provide beneficence when interacting with their patients. However, the majority of the time benevolent deception is used the p... ... middle of paper ... ...cal practice. Overall, physicians should not assume what they believe is best for their patients and should be truthful in relaying news about medical conditions, even though the diagnoses may be grave. Though the situation may look bleak, doctors need to take up the responsibility to be honest with their patients in order to honor the principle of respect for autonomy, and yet be beneficent by presenting a sense of realistic hope that treatment will succeed so that they will not easily give up on their chance of living.
Their mission is, “To advance patient safety, reduce ... ... middle of paper ... ...ts and their families from filing a malpractice suit. One of the key aspects to running a successful healthcare facility is continuous quality care. In essence, risk management, patient safety, and full-disclosure programs all play vital roles in quality care. Averting medical errors, recognizing problems, and finding ways to resolve these concerns are the organization’s objectives. A risk management program identifies the problem and determines the severity of a claim.