Eleanor Clark Occupational Therapy

2159 Words5 Pages

In 1993, Florence Clark was chosen to be the lecturer for the highly honored Eleanor Clarke Slagle Award. As found on the American Occupational Therapy Association ([AOTA], 2014) website, this esteemed distinction is based on an AOTA member’s influential and marked addition to the field of occupational therapy. Her lecture, Occupation Embedded in a Real Life: Interweaving Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy was based on her personal and professional interactions with a friend and tied in how the study of occupational science could progress occupational therapy rather than take away from a field that at times can struggle with its identity. Clark (1993) described Penny as an influential educator, a woman who lived to experience nature …show more content…

The medical model was predominant when most therapists were becoming educated so many practitioners may have continued to have that mindset while practicing (Gilfoye, 1984) (Reed, 1986) (Reed & Peters, 2008). As Reed and Peters (2008) voiced in their article about professional identity, some therapists continued to professionalize the field of occupational therapy, however by the late 1980's only a selection continued with the fight for a professional identity. Other therapist reverted back to former ways. This left the world of rehabilitation with a distinct division. As a result, Penny experienced firsthand the prevalent identity confusion. Clark (1993) mentioned Penny's descriptions of her therapy included words like, “aimlessly”, “disempowered”, “not quite human”, “dutifully perform[ing] the routines”, and “being inserted into a line of wheelchairs to reexperience waiting her turn”. This type of meaninglessness may be a risk when using the medical-model and is counter-productive to the purpose of a client-centered therapy. This is what Mary Reilly (1962) noted upon in her Slagle Lecture, that “science knowledge is a means for the application of our service and not an end in itself”. This idleness that Penny was subjected to is exactly what Reilly was hoping we would avoid. Instead, as Reilly (1962) mentioned, each individual should be given the …show more content…

Narratives are inexpensive, put the client first, and can be meaningful as they can be applied to any context. However, the author wonders if the use of occupational science may present another identity crisis for occupational therapy. As Reed and Peters (2008) stated, there had been what seemed as a delegation of research duties to other scientific fields during the early years of occupational therapy. Eventually, therapists learned to conduct their own research, consequently strengthening the field. This was what our founders had wanted for the field, they wanted therapists to partake in “engagement in scientific research in order to demonstrate the effectiveness of occupational therapy and establish its legitimacy” (Schwartz, 2009). We rose to this ideal and as Schwartz (2009) conveyed, we went from receiving research from other sectors to actively pursuing our own. Now, with the emerging field of occupational science, are we giving up a part our identity that we fought so hard to attain? Based on historical readings, the field of occupational therapy has struggled since inception to find itself within the world (Christiansen & Haertl, 2014). Today, it seems as though we are closer to a culture that values knowledge, individualism and intuition (Gilfoyle, 1984). If we give up the scientific study

Open Document