Edgework Theory

1870 Words4 Pages

Crime is omnipresent issue within society and is a constant source of concern among citizens. Youth crime in particular is of great apprehension, with statistics showing that the number of offences among young people is increasing. Crime Statistics Agency data obtained by Leader shows 25,636 offences were committed by people aged 18 and younger in the last 12 months with theft, assault and property damage the most common crimes (Heraldsun.com.au, 2018). Criminologists attempt to discover the underlying roots of crimes and the motivation behind the actions of offenders. A range of criminal theories have been established in which attempt to determine why individuals may be inclined to commit certain crimes. These theories range from physiological …show more content…

Furthermore, specific elements do not always correlate with all crimes. For instance the element of demonstrating one’s skill is not always present in crimes such as the use of illicit drugs. Drug taking can arguably be related to the edgework theory due the dangers associated with it and the sensation derived from the experience, however there is little to no skill involved with this crime. Scholars have also criticised edgework for it’s quite gendered perspective and that fact that it focusses heavily on masculine performance (Newmahr, 2011, 684). Miller (1991, 1537) argues that the edgework theory is significantly relevant to white, middle class men voluntarily participating risk taking activities, and fails to be applicable across races, genders and classes. The theory that addresses the issue is what is referred to as ‘feminist criminology’. Feminist criminology, unlike traditional theories, seeks to redress the general lack of attention to the broader cultural dynamics and seeks to place gender at the core of criminological research and inquiry. Feminine criminology has two major critiques of general crime theories. The first critique is its exclusion of women, with the theory predominantly focussing on explaining the reasons for male offender’s behaviour. The second critique is the gender based assumptions that categorise men as more rational and females as more emotion and so and so forth. This in turn leads to the search of gendered patterns in offending thus potential biases (Cullen, 2007, pp.

Open Document