Dysfunctional Group Dynamics Essay

1191 Words3 Pages

In contrast to a focus on individual characteristics, the dysfunction group dynamic also attends more to the influence of social processes when defining school bullying. Contextualised within the school community research that frames bullying as dysfunctional group dynamics moves the discussion of school bullying away from broader cultural influences and into the classroom (Hymel, McClure, Miller, Shumka, & Trach, 2014; Olthof, Goossens, Vermande, Aleva, & van der Meulen, 2011; Thornberg, 2011). Dysfunctional group dynamics attends to the social processes within the classroom and the school that lead to ‘destructive group-think… [which in a school context]… can be manifested as bullying’ (Schott, 2014). This third ontology of bullying marks …show more content…

Furthermore, the role an individual played was situation-dependent: the same person might be victimised by one group of students, while engaging in bullying of another. Understanding bullying as a function of dysfunctional group dynamics speaks to the changes in behaviour that are dependent on the persons present in the given moment of the conflict. This meant that depending on the variety of roles that an individual adopted in various group situations, they could then be understood as either; bullies, bully-victims, and victims, bystanders, up-standers, or uninvolved students (D. L. Espelage et al., 2013). Furthermore, these roles are fluid. Bullying behaviours are an attempt to ‘re-configure the relations between different individuals in the class and the groups to which they belong’ (Sondergaard, 2014), and as such, the same individual will exhibit behaviour dependent on the situation and the players at hand. This perspective frames bullying behaviour as a manifestation of interpersonal dynamics, as opposed to a behaviour (Hemphill, S.A., Heerde, J.A. & Gomo, 2014). It is through the fluid adoption of different roles that bullying becomes social processes of inclusion/exclusion to maintain or reconstruct social hierarchies. Focusing on the construction and maintenance of social hierarchies highlights the didactic …show more content…

The NSSF is a the public health model for evidence-based intervention, it strives ‘to create environments that support optimal mental health and the building of skills that enhance resilience’ (Anthony, Wessler, & Sebian, 2010). The evidence-based approach originates from evidence-based medicine, a movement within which a clinician is encouraged to adopt rational scepticism towards the evidence used for the diagnosis and treatment of patients. In comparison to medicine, the primary focus of a public health model is the community, rather than the individual, with an emphasis on prevention and health promotion of the whole community, as opposed to the diagnosis and treatment of an individual patient (Masiello & Schroeder, 2014, p6). Furthermore, where evidence-based medicine exists within the paradigm of medical care, evidence-based public health operates within additional paradigms of environment and human behaviour. Evidence-based approaches within the public health model require ‘an understanding of the complexities of organisational structures, interactions, and myriad other dynamics that shape and influence decision-making at the local, state, regional, and national levels within which public health operates and within which policies and programs are established’ (Gebbie,

More about Dysfunctional Group Dynamics Essay

Open Document