Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History of drug court
Why Drug Court? The purpose of Drug Court is to address addiction/ substance use problems of criminal defendants through an intense supervision treatment program and develop productive, healthy members of society, rather than criminals. Offenders who remain incarcerated may or may not get the help or intervention they need. In many cases, the help they do receive is often limited depending on the facility or jurisdiction they are in. However, more and more correctional facilities are focusing on addiction and substance use and abuse rehabilitation and treatment programs. An excellent example of a program in a correctional facility and something, a tool, that Drug Court uses as a sanction is a program at Henrico County’s Jail East called …show more content…
The inmates in the RISE program are housed separately from general population. It is a four-phase program that requires 42 days in each phase. The R.I.S.E. program often times plays a role in Henrico’s Drug Court. If a client has not been to the RISE program and are struggling with recovery/ treatment, often the Drug Court team will sanction the client to complete the RISE program, and sometime just the first phase. By sending a client from Drug Court to the RISE program, it separates the client from environmental factors that might have caused a relapse or urge to use. The client has to go to class every day for 12 hours until the program is complete. This also gives the client time to “dry out” before returning to the program. Once the client completes RISE, the client then returns to the Drug Court program and resumes with his/her intense supervision. This may potentially motivate the participant to …show more content…
The demographics were a mix of age groups from 22 to 55, a mix of African American (41) and Caucasians (15). There were 28 males and 28 females. All of the fifty-six graduates had one or more felony convictions prior to entry into Drug Court. For the purpose of the study that was conducted, recidivism is a conviction of an offense, within three years after entry into Drug Court, which can be punished by incarceration (Hammond & Shaw, 2012, p.3). This study was on graduates who completed the entire program. It was found that twelve out of the fifty-six participants were convicted of new offenses that can be punished by incarceration. The crimes that the participants committed and were convicted of were larceny, possession of narcotics, Driving Under the Influence, Failure to appear, Prostitution, Trespass, Identity Fraud, Driving without Authority, and Driving After Habitual Offender Adjudication. There were no violent offenses or burglary. Only two of the twelve participants were convicted of narcotic offenses. However, it is known the crimes that participants were convicted of are often drug or substance abuse related (Shaw & Hammond, 2012). Again, these numbers indicate participants who completed the entire program. The average number of graduates from the program per year when this study was conducted was fourteen. At any given time, there is anywhere from fifteen to thirty
The complex issues of dealing with offenders in the criminal justice system has been a point of ongoing controversy, particularly in the arena of sentencing. In one camp there are those who believe offenders should be punished to the full extent of the law, while others advocate a more rehabilitative approach. The balancing act of max punishment for crimes committed, and rehabilitating the offender for reintegration into society has produced varying philosophies. With the emanation of drug-induced crimes over the past few decades, the concept of drug treatment courts has emerged. The premise of these courts is to offer a “treatment based alternative to prison,” which consist of intensive treatment services, random drug testing, incentives
As offenders are diverted to community residential treatment centers, work release programs and study release centers, the system sees a decrease or stabilization of the jail population. While the alleviation of overcrowding is a benefit it is not the only purpose of diversion. A large majority of crimes are committed while under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Studies have shown that more than half of all individuals arrested in the United States will test positive for illegal substances (NCVC, 2008). Efforts to reduce crime through incarceration usually fail because incarceration does not address the main problem, the offender’s substance abuse.
Do you remember the first time we met? I do as I cannot shake the memory. It was love at first sight. I’ll never forget the feeling I had. A warmth overcame my body as you stoked a fire in my heart. It was like I had spent my life drowning in the sea around me and you were that breath of fresh air as I pulled myself out. My cares and concerns melted away. I was complete. You were exactly what I had been missing in my life. My better half you completed me you made me whole. Your touch, your scent, your glistening radiance I took it all in. I felt its force enter my body working its way to the very center of my soul. It felt like a real living breathing thing coalescing within my life force touching parts of me I never knew existed. You awakened some innate primal desire and I needed you at all times.
There was mostly females in the family drug court, and most of the cases involving drugs in Sherman deals with methamphetamine. The judge has a great deal of control, primarily because he is on a payroll. Graduations in this drug court are generally a big deal and are often elaborate, with the use of plaques to symbolize their achievement. As far as Sanctions are concerned, they vary case to case, however, they typically involve writing a letter or community service.
Once these individuals in rehab serve there sentence the majority of them, won’t look straight to the next opportunity to get high, but the next opportunity for a better future after being encouraged in rehab to accomplish something in life, compared to someone’s attitude coming out of prison. One story involved a man named Richard with his wife Marcia. She was an addict who was often jailed for it, but Anthony believed like many others that “addiction can be overcome with proper help. He believed that the solution was to get her into a mental hospital [and] get her whatever she needs – Xanax, morphine, to get her chemical imbalance right. Show her some respect. (114)” Give her some working skills, so once she gets out she is capable of being successful but instead she kept getting “kicked down the steps” by the criminal justice system. The jailing and torture of addicts is routine to people serving cases for drug related offenses, who are often not built to endure prison, let alone jail. “The Justice Department estimates that 216,000 people are raped in these prisons every year. (This is the number of rapes, not the number of rapes – that is much higher.) (109)” This is ultimately shows the simple fact that many people are not built to endure
The BCDTC experienced a great achievement as the program is reduced criminal offending in a population of drug-addicted chronic offenders. What is more? The program appears to have been successful at establishing a credible threat of future punishment for the drug court clients, and sanctions for noncompliance. Gottfredson and Exum Claim that “BCDTC received harsher sentences as a result of their initial arrest than did the control study participants, both in terms of incarceration and probation sentences” (2002). Both circuit and district court especially the circuit court are found to be successful at imposing a threat of future incarceration. On the other side of the coin, the Program fails to differentiate between in-program recidivism and post-program recidivism. Post program client’s behavior might be different from client behavior during intensive supervision and this might cause an overlap in behavior. Reducing criminal activity is clearly a
Drug courts were first established in Miami in 1989 and have continued to grow today. Over the past twenty-four years, drug courts have provided a treatment-orientated approach to help defendants with drug-related crimes. The constant interaction of the drug court provides the needed structure for participants to maintain their involvement in the program. Understanding the overall goals of the drug court and the outcomes of participants in the drug court program are the key factors in measuring the success of the drug courts.
The harsh punishment for drug crimes in the United States of America is not working. “With roughly half a million people behind bars in the U.S. for nonviolent drug offenses, drugs are as plentiful and widely used as ever” (Grenier, 2013). Even with very harsh long sentences and many people imprisoned drug use is as common as ever in America. ‘We cannot close our eyes anymore’ to the cost in human lives destroyed and taxpayer dollars wasted” (Holcomb, 2015). Harsh drug penalties are destroying American citizens lives and is costing a lot of money from taxpayers. “Yet, people who want treatment can often expect to endure an obstacle course just to get help” (Grenier, 2013). The Unites States government is spending a large amount of money on arresting and imprisoning drug users, yet are putting little to no focus on funding drug medical help for
Combating the recidivism rate has been shown to be a daunting task for America. America has the highest population in prisons with 20% of the world’s prison population and only 5% of the world’s population (Prison Crisis, 2014). The definition of Recidivism rate is defined in Merriam Webster as “a tendency to relapse into a previous condition or mode of behavior; especially: relapse into criminal behavior”. New Bedford has the highest crime rate of all of Massachusetts with an estimated 1,200 violent crimes in just the last year making studying this city prevalent. Throughout this paper I will examine recidivism rates throughout the country, and how these effects can help and affect New Bedford in particular. We will also examine the effects
Drug violators are a major cause of extreme overcrowding in US prisons. In 1992, 59,000 inmates were added to make a record setting 833,600 inmates nationwide (Rosenthal 1996). A high percentage of these prisoners were serving time because of drug related incid...
Right now in the United States there are over 2 million people incarcerated in the country’s prisons and jails. Out of this population about one-quarter of these inmates have been convicted of a drug offense. With drug offense arrests increasing nationwide and the prison population increasing there is an alternative to incarceration has been used over the past two decades in many cities across the country. This alternative is in the form of local drug courts that are now found in most major cities in the United States. A drug court is a specialized court in which the judge, prosecutor, public defender or private attorney, probation officers, and treatment counselors work together to help chemically dependent offenders obtain needed treatment and rehabilitation in an attempt to break the cycle of addiction and further criminal offenses. Some argue that treatment rather than incarceration is a waste of time and valuable resources that could be used elsewhere. Research however has shown that court ordered treatment is the best option for drug offenders. Treatments through drug court has proven to be less expensive than incarceration and has also been shown to reduce crime and provide a lower relapse and re-arrest rate for offenders that are placed in drug courts as opposed to those that are not.
The first step in ending the issue of drug use and abuse in our country is to cure the drug users from their addiction in a safe, controlled manner. As confirmed in an article from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, “Drug addiction is a chronic disease characterized by compulsive, or uncontrollable, drug seeking and use despite harmful consequences and changes in the brain, which can be long lasting.” (“Treatment Approaches for Drug Addiction”) The addiction of drugs is an actual disease, and cannot be brushed off as something that can be stopped at any point in time. Drug addiction is just as serious as any other diagnosed disease and must be cured accordingly. Prison will not benefit those addicted to drugs because it is a disease that must be treated, just as any other illness is. In an attempt to end an addiction without help in a safe environment, dangerous consequences could result.
In this study Grunwald, Lockwood, Harris, and Mennis (2010) used four different juvenile recidivism outcomes to measure the rate of recidivism among juveniles. One of the outcomes measured new offenses and specific offenses relating to property, drug, or violence. When Grunwald and his team measured for recidivism
Many individuals feel that when an individual goes to prison, the crimes and drugs go away. This is not accurate due to the imprisoned drug offender will do their time and then rejoin the community. These offenders often rejoin the community months and sometimes years later and many head straight back to their drug of choice. There are many of those that will not only go back to the drugs, but they will also go back to prison. (Doug McVay, 2004)
Drug laws are laws that are in place to monitor the use, sell and possession of drugs. Many drug users and legal sellers of drugs have a tendency to misuse and get into illegal situations The head of the United States believes that everyone who is educated, skilled with a trade and has determination should be able to compete with anyone in the world for a job or career. But, many Americans cannot compete or even be a contingent because of the dependency and abuse of drugs. The cost to the nations is astronomical. The history story of drugs laws can dated back to the very existent of America. Each state has its own set of laws governing the use and sell of drugs. The state of Massachusetts was the first to limit the availability of alcohol. Indians