Doubt By John Patrick Shanley: Play Analysis

1356 Words3 Pages

What You Don’t Want to Know “Doubt a Parable”
“There is something silent under every person…” (vii) John Patrick Shanley’s Pulitzer Prize-Winning play, Doubt, says and is these words that hook us to the doubt of knowing that every person hides a secret. Set in 1964 when The Liberal coalition took control, the play carries a dilemma of the reputation of a priest, Father Flynn, where is unknown if he has had any improper relationship with a black student Donald Muller, in a solely white Catholic School. However is hard to interpret the truth of the story because Shanley maintains a secret in every part of the play making the audience pay close attention to play and making them doubt about what they think the true is. Although Shanley does a …show more content…

How smartly and dumb a person can act when they find themselves in distress at so Father Flynn did by giving Donald wine to drank with the intention to get closed to him and make his move sooner “…when he came back…there was alcohol in his breath” (22) Sister Aloysius wait no longer to confront the Priest and reveals to him all the doubts she’s been having towards him and how she sees her doubt as clear trueness. Father Flynn get offended by her insolence and claims he has done no wrong but though never answer to any of Sister Aloysius questions instead he tries to play with her mind; When he’s been asked if he gave wine to Donald he does not denied it but neither accepted instead he curves the question, “have you never done Anything wrong?” (54) The wine becomes the confessor for Sister Aloysius of the wrong doings of Father Flynn as he and she knows he could only use the wine in Donald with the intention to make a move without his denial by telling him the meaning of the wine in the religious view, that is not bad to drink some that demonstrates the love toward the neighbor the good of faith the spiritual love of God himself adding that he knew the inclination “that’s why his father beat him up…for being what he is.”(48) Of the

Open Document