Does H. G. Wells Create A Utopia Or Dystopia?

2180 Words5 Pages

The author of Divergent said that, “If you actually succeed in creating a utopia, you've created a world without conflict, in which everything is perfect. And if there's no conflict, there are no stories worth telling - or reading!” (Veronica Roth). Roth is stating that utopian and dystopian literature is based on discussing conflict from the story, so it is necessary for there to be conflict worth talking about in the story. This rule of telling a story worth reading has stayed true throughout our history, so when H.G. Wells tells a story, it is reasonable to assume he intends to tell a story worth reading that includes conflict. In The Time Machine, Wells presents a far future society where most of our modern-day problems have been solved,
To start, when the Time Traveler first meets the two groups he prefers for the Eloi, “[The] graceful children of the Upper-world were not the sole descendants of our generation, but that this bleached, obscene, nocturnal Thing, which had flashed before me, was also heir to all the ages” (Wells 30). It does not take long for the Time Traveler to judge the creatures of the future based upon shallow traits such as their appearances. The Time Traveler depicts the Eloi as graceful children because he wants to make them appear as innocent like a child. Then he dehumanizes the Morlocks by defining them based on their exterior qualities, saying they are bleached and obscene. In continuation, Firchow explains the divide between the groups as “into the creatures of light (the Eloi) and the creatures of darkness (the Morlocks)” showing that the divide is not “merely social but it is also psychological.” (Firchow). Furthering the idea that this is a divide between good and evil, Firchow explains that the Time Traveler sees the Eloi as light and the Morlocks as darkness. The split between the Eloi and the Morlocks shows Wells opinion of the human condition that we are imperfect beings incapable of reaching a perfect balance. Furthermore, Tuerk presents the contrast between the groups plainly, stating that,
Science fiction is not without its fair share of symbolism and Wells uses symbolism in the Time Machine to represent his beliefs on the human condition. Traveling time in the “The Time Machine focuses on the ultimate destiny of the human race” (Firchow). Wells uses the book to express his opinions of the destiny of humanity and show that the world will never truly be perfect. The darkness consumed everything around the Time Traveler so “in the darkness [The Time Traveler] snatched at [his] matches and, hastily striking one, I saw three stooping white creatures similar to the one I had seen above ground in the ruin hastily retreating before the light.” the light reveals what was behind the darkness (Wells 34). The light is a symbol of humanity’s influence on the world, which can be helpful in revealing things in the dark or can hurt and burn things down. The fire represents the unknown in the world, because even in a “perfect” world, there is uncertainty and imperfection. In the end The Time Traveler reflects on the importance of the flowers, saying “And I have by me, for my comfort, two strange white flowers - shrivelled now, and brown and flat and brittle - to witness that even when mind and strength had honed, gratitude and a mutual tenderness still lived on in the heart of man” (Wells

Open Document