Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impacts of globalization on development
Globalization and sustainability short answer
Globalization and sustainability short answer
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impacts of globalization on development
Page Break
Achieving sustainable prosperity is a difficult task to face, though the way modern society is going about it is all wrong. Globalization is not helping to obtain the goal of equality. No countries, developed or developing, nor the economic wellbeing of the global community is benefiting from this phenomenon. Globalization does not contribute to sustainable prosperity for all.
Even developed countries, such as Canada, have not met sustainable prosperity for all of their people. Opening up to other developed and developing countries is not helping to achieve it. Many developed countries are outsourcing their jobs to people in less developed countries than their own. However what is happening to the people who previously
…show more content…
When companies based in developed countries outsource jobs to people in developing countries increasing their average wages, creates increased disparity among the people of their country. Income disparity is the difference of income distribution across a population. A rise in these differences make the poor seem poorer and make those who are less fortunate feel as though they aren’t doing enough to provide for themselves or their families. When citizens of developing countries sell their products directly to developing countries, such as selling cocoa beans from Ghana or coffee beans from Columbia, they realize that they can get much more money for their produce than they had been from to their own country. Realizing the worth of their merchandise they increase the prices for local buyers; this creates an even larger economic gap and further increased disparity in comparison. Higher prices make goods less affordable for citizens of undeveloped countries and continue to contribute to the downfall of sustainable …show more content…
Many economic situations can lead to depleted sustainability. Andean glaciers are melting faster than they ever have in the last three hundred years. These glaciers have melted nearly fifty four meters since the late nineteen seventies and if they continue at this rate tens of millions of people will need to find a new source of fresh drinking in as little as a couple decades. How prosperous can a person or a nation be without water? The economic need for goods and services from overseas has led to increased pollution from a multitude of sources; this pollution is causing the earth to warm and life essential glaciers to melt. Bolivians are not the only people who will be affected by the melting of glaciers, many low lying coastal cities will be affected dramatically. If all of the ice on the planet melted and drained into the ocean, water levels would raise two hundred sixteen feet, coastal cities including New Orleans, Miami, Cancun, would be entirely underwater. Global warming from globalization is ruining our earth. A high supply to demand ratio on certain goods can also affect sustainability not only of people but of land as well. If there is a high demand for chocolate in Canada, there is a high demand for cocoa beans from chocolate companies. This can cause cocoa pod farmers to over use their land which will eventually result in poor crops from soil that has lost its good
“Globalization contributes to sustainable prosperity for all people”. This quote contains mostly truth but there are also many arguments towards how globalization really does contribute to sustainable prosperity for people all around the world. This can be supported by three main points. How the rise of Japan’s economy effected the lives of millions of people. How shipwrecking effects the lives of both the ship companies and the workers in Bangladesh, and how economic growth contributes to the sustainable prosperity of the population in a specific nation. Sustainable prosperity can be defined differently from different individuals because of people’s personal opinions and their perspective is also effected by the people who influence their lives the most, but the main definition of prosperity is to have good fortune, or growth in an economic way. Globalization creates a gateway for sustainable prosperity to all people and gives people all around the world the opportunity to gain prosperity.
We Americans demand for cheaper goods and cheaper goods result in a thing called “sweatshops”. Sweatshops are places where they have workers in foreign places working for cheap money because they know they will work for anything to be able to making a living.
Globalization contributes to sustainable prosperity in many ways. In order to have sustainable prosperity everyone has to be willing to aid others, no one can achieve such sustainability for everyone without the aid of others. Humans have the potential to overcome great disasters and catastrophes with the help of globalization.
Sustainable prosperity is a very controversial topic. There are a lot of differing opinions about what it is or how it affects us. What is sustainable prosperity? Let’s break it down. Prosperity, it is the idea that all humans needs are met, and they are able to follow a life of happiness. Sustainability, means being able to continue something over generation after generation. We live in a globalizing world today, but to what extent does globalization contribute to sustainable prosperity? Globalization promotes sustainable prosperity, but at the same time it is holding it back. But over all it limits the prosperity of all people in many ways. Globalization affects the way we live, and it has negative affects that cause people to live miserable lives.
The essay, “The Noble Feat of Nike” by Johan Norberg basically talks about the effects of Nike going into third world countries, particularly Vietnam. Norberg explains how Nike’s factory gains from being in its desired location, Vietnam. Vietnam being a communist country comes to Nike’s advantage, because if they were located elsewhere they would have to pay workers higher wages and use more of their machines. Workers in these countries are provided with an air conditioned building with regular wages, free meal plans, free medical service, and training/education to operate the machinery within the factory. The workers find all of this beneficial and in their own favor because of the fact their earning double to five times the amount in wages than if they were working outdoors on a farm. This great deal, blinds them to notice the meaning behind the company’s location in Vietnam. The Nike factory was rather clever in making their location in that specific area to gain benefits for Western owners. The catch Nike gains from is simple. The owners pay factory workers only a small monthly sum from what they make selling the shoes to customers. Globalists state that the company doesn’t pull this fast one on the Western population because of our advancements compared to the Eastern countries. Western people would protest and strike to demand better wages for their work, but the people in Eastern countries have no choice but to deal with the injustice in order to support their families and educate their children.
Introduction on Water It covers 70% of our planet, makes up 75% of our body, it is necessary for survival and it is declining at a rapid rate (http://www.sscwd.org). It is water. Unfortunately, clean water is rare, almost 1 billion people in developing countries do not have access to water everyday. “Yet, we take it for granted, we waste it, and we even pay too much to drink it from little plastic bottles” (The Water Project). Use of earth’s natural resources should be seen as prosperity, although it is taken for granted, every aspect of daily life revolves around the environment, forcing water conservation to be necessary for future on this planet.
Breathable air and drinkable water – two collective goods that people often take for granted. Many cannot imagine a world without these goods, but global climate change is leading down the path toward increased scarcity of these collective goods. By continuing with current trends, corporations, those who cut down the forests, and factory farms put clean air at risk by continuously emitting carbon-dioxide into the atmosphere. The increased temperatures due to global climate change lead to less snow, less glaciers, and ultimately less drinking water for all of the world’s people. Rather than allowing the loss and destruction of this planets collective goods to occur, all persons must begin addressing the root cause: global climate change.
... policies. People will continue to suffer in silence because of the world’s greed. So, while we enjoy our cheaply made goods and over consume the planet into demise, we never know of choose not to know the pain that went into the productions of those goods. Globalization may be championed as a gateway to financial growth for all nations, but only certain nations benefit from it. Global trading and integration has a negative effect on undeveloped nations and developed nations in many ways including; political systems, sovereignty, economy, way of life and much more. Earlier in the essay I asked ‘do the pros outweigh the cons when it comes to globalization’ and from my research I don’t see any real benefit. I don’t believe we should eliminate global business, but better the already lacking regulations and probably increase the standard of living equally for the world.
...every corner of the globe. When those low costs occur as a result of inferior, and even illegal, working conditions, then sweatshops are a major global problem. A possible solution would be to change, or at least modify, the conditions under which sweatshops continue to function. Universal workers rights, with minimum age and minimum wages could be a solution. Still, certain countries will always have the advantage of low cost labor and will exploit that advantage in the international marketplace. However, the disparity between the great differences in labor cost can be lessened, but it can best be done by continuing to promote world free trade and continuing to improve the quality of life in developing nations, where low cost labor is most abundant.
Globalization, love it or hate it, but you can’t escape it. Globalization may be regarded as beneficial from an economic and business point of view, but however cannot be perceived the ditto when examined from the social sciences and humanities side of it. Globalization can be argued as a tool for economic growth, advancement and prosperity through co-operation between the developed and developing countries. The pro-globalization critics argue that the benefits that globalization brings to developing nations surpasses or outcasts the negative impacts caused by globalization and may even go a step further to state that it is the only source of hope for developing nations to prosper and stand out. However, the real question to be asked is as to what extent are the positives argued upon without taking into account the negative aspects of globalization towards developing countries. Moreover, how many developing countries out of many are exactly benefiting or even prospering from globalization is another question to consider. Therefore, my paper will dispute that indeed growth and advancement provided by globalization to developing countries is beneficial in short-term, but in the long-run, it will only bring upon negative impacts and challenges due to the obstacles involved such as exploitation of labour and resources, higher increase in poverty, and effects of multi-national corporations on local businesses and the economy, and to an extent the effects on the developing country itself.
Over the past few decades there have been discourses both in favor and against Globalization’s capacity to guarantee a sustainable future. Authors attest societies and businesses’ inability to account for ecological and environmental limits when dealing with economic growth, examples of this are some of the traditional business metrics used by most global companies, and nations’ measure of wealth (GDP); both sides heavily resting on economic factors, fail to account for societal and environmental concerns (Byrnea & Gloverb, 2002). Other researchers point at the intensive use of resources, especially by global corporations; such as the increasing and careless consumption of fossil fuels, water, precious metals, etc. leading to a rise in GHG (Starke, 2002) (United Nations Development Program (UNDP), 2000). Most fervent opponents go as far as to call ‘sustainable development’ an oxymoron (Ayres, 1995).
70% of this demand derives from agriculture which shows the influence of water on food supply globally as well as not just drinking water (Sawin “Water Scarcity could overwhelm the Next Generation”). But increasing water use is not just a matter of the greater number of people needing it to drink and eat; it also comes from pollution and misuse of water supplies, by either dumping or runoff of bacteria or chemicals into water. This also “causes other pollutions as well such as soil and air pollution, accelerating wetland damage and human-caused global warming” (Smith and Thomassey 25). According to a UN report, recent estimates suggest that climate change will account for about 20 percent of the increase in global water scarcity in coming decades. One of the main causes of water scarcity is water mismanagement worldwide.
Globalization is the increasing interconnectedness of people, places, and cultures throughout the world today. The effects of this homogenizing process that we call globalization can be seen in all aspects of life. From McDonalds being in almost every country, to the majority of North American clothes being made in periphery countries, to the technological ability that allows us to instantly communicate with people anywhere in the world, the effects are everywhere. Economically today, globalization has had both positive and negative effects around the world, with many similarities to colonization. Globalization has also led to increased poverty amongst the global periphery, and a specific group of winners and losers within this process of globalization.
Globalization has been a start of a new modernized era in history. The source states that as an individual you are given prosperity, stability, and also predictability, and also points out that it helps developing countries modernize and catch up with developed countries, and also reduce poverty since new businesses are formed allowing more employment in the country due to the subsidies that wealthier countries give to them. The person who wrote this source is a pro globalist, and has probably experienced the prosperity that was given to them because of the global trading system. His perspective on globalization suggests that globalization is the key to advancing technology, good relations between countries, and is beneficial event in history. One should embrace the global economy as it creates many roads to achieve your goals in your life, and also for the weaker countries that needs support, but to a degree that the government can intervene with the market.
The current world population of approximately 5.9 Billion will double in the next forty -ninety years. To further compound the water shortages, human consumption of water is rising twice as fast as the population. The exponential population growth has a severe effect on the amount of water being used and the amount of pollutants that go back into it. Take for example the problems that people in California are having with water and trying to get it. California's current water use is unsustainable. In many areas, ground water is being used at a rate that exceeds the rate of natural replenishment. Fish and wildlife species are being destroyed by withdrawal of water, as well as by development. Official projections are that water demand will exceed available supplies in the year 2020 (Simon 18).