More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths/weaknesses of mediation
Strengths/weaknesses of mediation
The role of mediation in conflict resolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths/weaknesses of mediation
(2) An award on agreed terms shall be made in accordance with the provisions of article 31 and shall state that it is an award. Such an award has the same status and effect as any other award on the merits of the case.” The arbitral tribunal may be told of the settlement by one of the parties alone, especially if the settlement has been recorded in a contract. Upon learning of the settlement, and being convinced that it had really taken place, the arbitral tribunal is called upon to terminate the proceedings, by which is meant the entire arbitration. It would be rare that a tribunal would do so without having received assurances from both or all the parties that the settlement had truly been agreed upon (unictad.org).
4.1.5. Default Award
The default award is the one made while one party has not participated in the proceedings. It is the common rule currently that the failure of the respondent to submit a defense or to participate in the hearings to which it has been given adequate notice does not impede the arbitral tribunal from continuing the proceedings o...
...cision? Why did the Court rule that way? The Supreme Court remanded the case to the 11th circuit for a closer consideration of the arbitral forum’s financial accessibility to the borrower. The agreement to arbitrate was not rendered unenforceable simply because the agreement said nothing about arbitration costs and thus allegedly failed to provide the borrower protection from potentially substantive costs of pursuing her federal statutory claims in the arbitral forum.
The planned settlement is a concession reflecting the reality that ending the hearing would expose Microsoft to an undefined result and would put the government case at risk. The government dropped numerous basics of the conduct remedies that they had accomplished in the original hearing and the ...
There’s a lot more to being in debt aside from the fact that you owe more than you currently own. In addition to having balances that you need to pay, you also have to deal with calls from collectors or reminders that the bill is overdue — every single day. This alone is enough of a nuisance to make one want to run away from the debt and forget about it. Fortunately, there are ways to solve the problem of debt. One of these is debt settlement.
This statement is further elaborated by Schmitz who states that the parties of the arbitral proceedings have to respect and maintain whatever they have learnt in the arbitration as secret. The press and the public lose the access to the hearings and the awards. The documents used in the arbitral proceeding would not be admissible in court proceedings. But in reality this type of secrecy does not exist in arbitral proceedings since certain information need to be disclosed for the public welfare. As one author has noted, “Privacy is concerned with the right of persons other than the arbitrators, parties and their necessary representatives and witnesses, to attend the arbitration hearing and to know about the arbitration. Confidentiality by contrast, is concerned with information relating to the content of the proceedings, evidence and documents, addresses, transcripts of the hearings or the award.” The general practice for determining the issue of confidentiality is to see through the customs, usage and whether confidentiality has been impliedly included in the arbitration
majority verdict (either 10-2 or 11-1) if they have considered the verdict for a reasonable time and cannot come to a
6-9. When the litigants settle their case by compromise, let the magistrate announce it. If they do not compromise, let them state each his own side of the case, in the comitium of the forum before noon. Afterwards let them talk it out together, while both are present. After noon, in case either party has failed to appear, let the magistrate pronounce judgment in favor of the one who is present. If both are present the trial may last until sunset but no later.
Conflict would occur when “disagreement exists” within an organisation over different issues (French, 2011). These issues can be associated with power; “the potential ability to influence behaviour” (Pfeffer, 1992 p. 713: cited in Martin, 2005).
contractual term that is included in a wide variety of agreements between two or more parties. This clause demands that any disputes that arise between these parties out of contracts or transactions be settled through an arbitration proceeding"(1) Arbitration is a form of ADR, Alternative Dispute Resolution, that is an alternaitve to a trial by jury. Instead of a judge deciding in favor of one of the parties during litigation, an arbitrator is able to make a legally binding decision. Arbitration was designed to be more beneficial to both parties over litigation as it's faster, cheaper, has
Opposing interests, exchange of goods or service, and terms of agreements, are but a few reasons conflict can arise between parties. These controversies can stem from business or personal relationships, and be held in formal or informal settings, but all require some form of resolution in order to satisfy or assuage the parties involved. Negotiation, or bargaining, is a common method used to obtain resolution. A variety of strategies can be employed in this process, some with more favorable outcomes for both parties than others. A negotiation, often referred to as an art, involves both skill and science, and the use of both determines the process taken for the bargaining, as well as the outcome (Stoshikj,
When a party decides to use arbitration to come up with a decision the most important step in the process is the agreement to arbitrate. This agreement can be the form of a future dispute arbitration clause in a contract or, if the party did not submit for arbitration in advance it then it can take the form of a submission of an existing case to arbitration. If parties want to provide for arbitration of futur...
Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR refers to a number of various processes that can be used to resolve legal disputes other than by litigation. Recently, methods of dispute resolution which focus on arbitration, mediation and negotiation as an alternative to adjudication have gained notoriety. This notoriety may have been caused by the public perception that ADR methods are less expensive, more efficient, and more satisfactory than the normal traditional course of litigation. The goals of establishing these processes to resolve disputes as an alternative to more formal legal processes include: 1) to make the regular court system more efficient, less costly and more responsive to the needs of the litigants; 2) to offer alternative methods of dispute resolution in addition to the regular court system; and 3) to provide public education about the available alternatives.
ADR holds an extensive, easily influenced and diverging choice of processes for finding solutions to disputes which are personified by structured negotiation and consensus. It is regarded that arbitration is a familiar ADR technique, however, it is more of an official adjudicative and adversary technique initially a confidential litigation process which has more commonality to litigation than the more original consensual processes which symbolise ADR. As simplified by Angyal (Alternative Dispute Resolution, 1987, p. 11). "The key difference between ADR and those traditional techniques of litigation and arbitration is that ADR techniques are used to produce a resolution to dispute through a negotiated agreement while litigation and arbitration are processes by which a result is imposed on the parties. " We can say that many issues arise with terms.
No appeal is allowed against an award granted by the arbitrator. If an irregularity has occurred or gross misconduct by the arbitrator or the commissioner is proven a party has six weeks to file for a review in the Labour Court.
The defendant is an Airlines Company that had 900 employees. The economic crisis followed with monetary crisis gave bad effects to the defendant. They should decrease the number of their airplanes form 9 to 2 airplanes. They also had to do the efficiency on their employees to 700. On the efficiency process, there was an agreement between the defendant and employees representation on October 30 1998. The agreement stated that they would bring Independent Public Accountant to analyze company financial condition. During the process, all side should work on their duty. The Defendant should pay employees’ wage. The agreement was not guarantee that didn’t mean the dispute process was over, but the negotiation still moved on. During the process, there was another agreement between the defendant and several employees. They agreed the finish the disputed process and the employees would get separation pay. Meanwhile, other employees, who were 153 people didn’t agree with that agreement. Because they didn’t agree each other, so the employees gave the case to the “Panitia Penyelesaian Perselisihan Perburuhan Pusat (P4P)”.
The Army Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process describes techniques to describe and encourage managers to develop and utilize innovative ways of resolving disputes. Techniques used in Alternative Dispute Resolution may be used to prevent dispute, resolve them at earlier stages, or settle them before a formal legal process is executed. The Army as organization understands that disputes will take place. This is not the problem. The ADR process helps determine how to deal with the problem. Should one engage in confrontation? That could result in a bitter dispute, thus damaging a relationship further. A favorable outcome would include the parties reaching an agreement to the dispute.