Disobedience By Erich Fromm

1247 Words3 Pages

One cannot be obedient to one’s power without being disobedient to another. In his article, “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem,” Erich Fromm argues people obey authority to feel safe. When one obeys, they become an ambiguous part of a whole, no longer accountable for actions or left on their own. In Ian Parker’s article, “Obedience,” analyzing Milgram's experiment, he claims people obey orders when there is no second option. According to Parker, if someone obeys an order, but there is no alternative, their accountability is lessoned. The two articles can speak to the tomfoolery that takes place in the motion picture, Mean Girls, which highlights a typical high school under the regime of the queen bee, Regina George, with her followers Gretchen Weiners and Karen Smith; the regime is usurped by a new girl, Cady Heron. Under the scope of Parker and Fromm, it can be argued that Gretchen was not disobeying Regina when she realigned with Cady, but actually remaining obedient to the social order of high school. Gretchen was not a helpless victim to Regina’s ruthlessness or a robotic follower. When pointing out Gretchen to Cady, Damien comments, "that's why …show more content…

Parker, however, would instead pose that Gretchen finally had a chance to disobey Regina because she had the option to follow Cady. She finally had a second, viable option, allowing her to disobey. Therefore, Parker’s logic would state that this switch of leadership is proof that Gretchen was disobedient to

Open Document