After 42 long days the Tucson bus strike ended with a new contract to the union member. During this time period members of the Tuscon community conducted their own fair strike. People walked on the bus and refused to pay for their ride. On a normal scale this would be considered a “misbehavior” or a “deviant” act. However, the book links conduct misbehavior as an analytic category and not an empirical one. Therefore, it is the context of the misbehavior will influence whether it will be determined as a deviant act or develop into a social moment. When comparing an individual’s misconduct to a collective group, you can look at the collective group doing the same act and it can be considered a social movement. The same can be said about the Tuscon fair strike. I’ve been in a situation where someone …show more content…
Social situation have clear moral codes of conduct to adhere to and those that break them are considered trouble-makers. However, put in the situation, such as the Tuscon strike, where a large number of people refuse to pay the response to this act shifts. While considered a misconduct or deviant act, the bus drivers were actually instructed to allow the riders to ride if they refused to pay. Had they refused a large number of people from riding, greater outbreak and protest would more than likely ensued. In this instance the protest was done to encourage the city to give Suntran more money to settle the original strike. This is an effective way of protesting because without paying the fair price the city will lose money and after a month of limited buses, the city wouldn’t be able to afford more losses. In this instance the traditional movement would be the union strike to not drive buses until the wages were taken care of. The Tuscon fare strike not only benefits the union strike by speeding up the process, those people who participate in the strike also get a free
To stifle the spread of the ‘contagion,’ the article, “Four Students Spark Spreading Drive,”sites how the “good performance of the Southern police” is what “prevented chaos.” [v] By using a favorable term to describe the white institutions, the article works to label police as an admirable unit who selflessly suppressed anarchy. This is contrasted with the ‘chaos’ utilized to describe the sit-in protestors. In making this comment, the article implies that the protests harm society rather than help it. Moreover, words like “contagion” and “chaos” are also utilized to condemn the black’s entitlement to protests; once again, the media plays on white fears that whites might stand to lose their sense of entitlements if they allow minorities to have the same rights as they do. The diction used by the Chicago Defender’s article parallels the word choice of Harold L. Keith’s article, “Are White Supremacists Killing Labor?”, which is about the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Triggered by the arrest of Rosa Parks, the NAACP organized the Boycott to change segregation laws regarding bus seats and driver courtesy toward people of color. Emerging Civil Rights activist Martin Luther King Jr. was primarily responsible for coordinating the Bus boycott movement.[vii]. Keith’s article
Carcasses attract scavengers. The Guilty Party by O. Henry showcases the untimely death of a girl of twelve, Liz. Above Chrystie Street on the east side, a strange bird stalks the children of the playground. Although people say it’s a stork, locals call it a vulture. In this case, Liz is the carcass that the vulture sets its eyes on.
The American Behavioral Scientist, 44(12), 2252-2268. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/214769221?accountid=45049. Gray, M. (2014). The 'Standard'. The L.A. riots: 15 years after Rodney King.
... (Piven & Cloward, 18) Workers protest by striking against their employer, it is easier for employees to protest because they are all located and working together under one roof and are fighting for one thing, and that one thing is related to the workplace. While it is easier for employees to protest, it is not that easy for lower class employees to protest because they have little ability to protect themselves against their institutional managers. When the lower class workers have an informal organizational protest the government is eventually stepping in to disarm the protestors and make efforts to conciliate, “…mobs of unemployed were granted relief in the 1930s…” (Piven & Cloward, 29) The protests cause disruption and sometimes that disruption can make a change but when people are protesting blindly they are more prone to social injustice then making a change.
Although the article was short and did not share a lot of details about the incident, social institutions were identified. One of the social institutions identified
As said by Governor George Ryan, “Since 1973, over 130 people have been released from death rows throughout the country due to evidence of their wrongful convictions.” With each of these wronged convictions, the victim who should rightfully be convicted was able to walk free and possibly continue to commit crimes. Many of these wronged convictions entail parts of conflict theory with them because the dominant group will view things that they believe are socially deviant as criminal. The example in class of the 1992 Chicago gang ordinance shows how the dominant group, the police force, viewed standing on a street corner as socially deviant and thus, labeled it criminal. In The Central Park Five, the five who were convicted were in Central Park late at night, which was socially deviant. Since there was crime that was committed that night, it was easy to take the socially deviant situation of the kids being in the park late at night, them being in the same place as the crime, and them all being non-white and the victim being white and turn the crime on them. At the start of the night, there were kids who were throwing rocks at cars and assaulting homeless people to the extent of smashing one with a beer bottle. Out of all of the kids who were in the park that night, when they all took off running, it didn’t matter which five were stopped and taken to the police station, as long as there were non-white and in the park that night they could have been one of the “central park five”. “Central park five” turns into a label knowing that regardless of who the kid was and their background, the officers involved were going to manipulate they into confessing to the crime and then end up being convicted. Crime today involves conflict theory and can
Often, an unplanned action by a local could manifest as a rallying point for the movement. An example of a semi-spontaneous action done by a local was “Rosa Parks’s reasoned decision to violate a segregation ordinance,” a decision that later “sparked the Montgomery boycott” (Ransby 195). She believed in social change that derived from semi-spontaneous actions by the lower people, which were referred to as people from the pew, or locals. People from the pew had just as much impact on the civil rights movement as well-known leaders. Rosa Parks executed a semi-spontaneous action that resulted with a significant form of progress in the civil rights movement: the Montgomery Bus Boycott. A civil rights leader, like King, could have constructed a bus boycott, but Parks had just as much influence, even though she was not a leader. In addition, the younger generations were also undertaking semi-spontaneous actions, such as sit-ins. The local youth, not civil rights leaders, had enough driving force to influence a mass movement through these acts. Such actions began in a somewhat unplanned manner comparable to
The Major Crimes Act was an important piece of legislation regarding the jurisdiction of Indian tribes on U.S. soil, and was passed on March 3, 1885. It was one of the concluding sections of the Indian Appropriations Act of 1885, which sought to deal with Indian American relations of the latter-19th century. The Major Crimes Act law was passed by Congress, following the General Crimes Act of 1817. The Major Crimes Act expanded on the General Crimes Act by detailing what could constitute as a crime under the federal jurisdiction of the United States if they were to be committed by a Native American in a Native American territory. It also added the caveat that crimes committed between two Native Americans would also count under federal jurisdiction
How would you question a witness or an offender? In either case, it is important to differentiate an interrogation or a cross examination. The process of interrogation is asked by offering party of the witness, expert, police, victim, or the offender. In other words, the lawyer or district attorney interrogates in favor of the victim’s or offender's interest. The main purpose of the questions being asked is to proceed the process of the jury. Therefore, when a prosecutor interrogates the offender, it proceeds the jury in favor of the victim. On the other hand, if the defense attorney is interrogating the victim, the purpose is to advance the trial in favor of the offender.
A false confession is an “admission plus a post admission narrative of a crime that the confessor did not commit” (Leo, 2009). Research shows that individuals falsely confess to crimes that they have not committed (Drizin & Leo, 2004; Kassin et al., 2010). Interrogations have been seen to lead to false confessions, which individuals are then incarcerated for crimes they did not commit. Some of these individuals are then later exonerated because of DNA evidence proving their innocence. Many of these cases are involving false confessions, which are given by individuals in coercive, police interrogations. “ In 15 to 20 percent of the DNA cases, police-induced false confessions were the primary cause of the wrongful conviction” (Leo, 2009). The
Societies that esteem social conformity view defiance as a by-product of insolence rather than an act of courage. Isolation of individuals that do not abide by the set restrictions is another common characteristic of systems that encourage mob mentalities. As a result, in order to be accepted by peers, individuals often have to function based on societal expectations. Some consider pursuing their own opinions and ideas against the social norms. This often garners backlash and hostilities from other members of society, ranging from physical and verbal abuse to denial of individual’s competence and sanity to complete alienation from society. Although some people are able to champion their freedom of expression and right to opinions over the need
In a list you make in your report specifically identify the status offense laws that are being violated by each of the underage teenage violators.
The world will always be full of crime, thus it is necessary for scientist to grow along with the gruesome and increasing amount of violations. Due to this it sparked scientist to develop crime theories in which emerged to explain why crime is caused by individuals. Some of the few theories that have advanced over the past century and provided many answers to why crimes are committed are biological theories, psychological theories and learning theories. These theories provide an insight to its first use and change in order to provide answers.
The current labor movement in human relations, business and industry has deep roots in the past and is continuing to evolve in the present. The struggle for survival and the drive to become successful in society, and the business world, fuel the current activities. Grassroots movements for fair wages and tolerable working conditions bring workers together to collectively affect change through the formalized organization of labor unions. Social theorists have over the past century, attempted to explain the complex processes that occur within labor movements. Mishel & Walters theorize that collective bargaining units have a positive impact upon human relations, and labor negotiations within business, industry and politics. While some of their views are supported by popular social theories, other theorists’ suggestions contrast sharply with their opinions.
The Classical School of Criminology generally refers to the work of social contract and utilitarian philosophers Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham during the enlightenment in the 18th century. The contributions of these philosophers regarding punishment still influence modern corrections today. The Classical School of Criminology advocated for better methods of punishment and the reform of criminal behaviour. The belief was that for a criminal justice system to be effective, punishment must be certain, swift and in proportion to the crime committed. The focus was on the crime itself and not the individual criminal (Cullen & Wilcox, 2010). This essay will look at the key principles of the Classical School of Criminology, in particular