Deviant 101 Summary

669 Words2 Pages

In the “Deviant 101” article, Schoeplfin talks about how certain types of behaviors can be seen as deviant. He questions whether an act should be considered deviant if it does not get a response. Schoeplfin uses real and hypothetical examples throughout the article to show how deviance is measured by the reactions it receives. Also, he concludes by looking at whether the feedback from behavior has to be negative to constitute it as deviant or if the feedback can be positive as well. In the article “Deviant While Driving,” Schoeplfin writes about the notion of driving a hearse and whether or not it would be seen as deviant. He recalls a time when he contacted an old friend, Bill, who used a hearse for personal transportation. Schoeplfin found that his friend did not buy the hearse with devious intent, but that his …show more content…

Also, Bill told Schoeplfin about the reactions that people gave him and that many were negative, but some were positive. These responses caused Schoeplfin to question if driving a hearse should be considered deviant. He points out that some deviant behavior can get positive reactions from those who would not commit such behavior but admire the boldness that deviance requires. I agree with Shoeplifin that deviance should be measured by the types of responses that it receives. Looking at other people’s reactions to behavior helps to determine whether that behavior is in fact deviant and to also gauge how deviant the behavior is. In response to Shoeplifin’s question “if you violate a norm but there’s no reaction to that violation, is it really deviant behavior,” I do not think it is. If something is deviant, it will provoke a response of some sort. This is because deviant behavior is something that most individuals would choose not to do themselves. Therefore, in seeing someone behave in a way that he

Open Document