De Sexing In Australia

626 Words2 Pages

Introduction
According to Animal Health Alliance (2013), Australia had one of the highest rates of pet ownership in the world, with more than 5 million out of 7.6 million households in Australia owning a pet. An estimated 4.2 million pets in Australia were dogs, making them the most common pet owned amongst Australian households (Animal Health Alliance, 2013). Due to the high pet ownership rates and the need to attend to the welfare of pets, companion animal veterinary services are in demand among pet owning households. Pet owners spend approximately $1.7 billion on veterinary services a year, which include visits to the veterinarian for vaccination, general check-up, dentistry and de-sexing (Animal Health Alliance, 2013). De-sexing a pet is …show more content…

Benefits of de-sexing can include reducing the propensity for unwanted and undesired behavior such as aggression problems in dogs and reduce unwanted pregnancy thus prevent over-population of unwanted puppies (Downes et al, 2015). In addition, de-sexing is a preventative health measure to reduce the risk of cancer and other diseases affecting the reproductive organs (Animal Health Alliance, 2013; McKay, Farnworth & Waran, 2009). For example, de-sexing minimises the risk of mammary and ovarian cancer, pyometra in bitches and prostate cancer, adenomas and prostatic hyperplasia in male dogs (McKay, Farnworth & Waran, 2009). However, there are also many concerns about potential detriments and side effects related to dog de-sexing such as increment of the dog’s weight, surgical complications and increased risk of prostatic neoplasms in male dogs that are de-sexed (McKay, Farnworth & Waran, 2009; Trevejo, Yang & Lund, 2011; Downes et al, 2015). Other barriers identified included the de-sexing cost and that de-sexing was not necessary because the pet was often kept indoors or fenced-in (Trevejo, Yang & Lund, 2011; Downes et al, …show more content…

For instance, Fielding, Samuels and Mather (2002) reported that younger owners were less inclined to de-sex their dogs compared to older owners as they wish to breed them. Previous studies also found that owner gender influences the attitude towards dog de-sexing (Blackshaw & Day, 1994; Fielding, Samuels & Mather, 2002; Cocia & Rusu, 2010). This was evident as studies found male owners were less likely to de-sex male dogs as they were able to relate with their male dog’s sexuality (Blackshaw & Day, 1994; Fielding, Samuels & Mather, 2002; Cocia & Rusu,

More about De Sexing In Australia

Open Document