Darkness At Noon Summary

1987 Words4 Pages

Introduction “Darkness at Noon” is a novel written by Arthur Koestler, a British novelist. The book was originally published in 1940. Koestler provides a story of Nicholas Rubashov a Bolshevik revolutionary who was imprisoned and charged with treason by the Soviet government in 1930s. Koestler uses Rubashov to explore the events that took place in the Moscow Show Trails in 1938. The life of Rubashov represents the account of lives of men who were victims of the Moscow Trails. The author investigates the journey of Rubashov life from the time of his arrest to the final confession and death. Koestler accounts the disturbing events of Rubashov as he experiences psychological change from his ability to resist challenges to almost total surrender. …show more content…

He is represented as a dictator who exercised his power ruthlessly and ignores the will of the people by taking advantage of the people due to their ignorance. The authors show the limitless power of the authority during the Moscow trial and the Great Purges of 1936-1938, where Stalin and the police apprehended all rebels and executed them. Additionally, the limitless power of Stalin made him to eliminate all rivals from the Communists Party including Rubashov. The results of the limitless power by Stalin resulted in deaths of many people and failed to fulfill the desire of the people. For instance, Stalin cruelty is depicted in the note that Rubashov wrote before his execution stating, “Koba, why do you need me to die?” The note shows the unjust and illogical features of the Great Purges (Koestler, …show more content…

The book intended to reflect on the lives of people who were victims of the Moscow trials in their attempts to change the world into a better place to meet the greater common good. The author wanted to provide readers with the understanding that the contradictions existing in politics is an indication of something wrong. Koestler wants to enhance people’s knowledge that social morality and the political and philosophical ideas of revolutionary activities cannot work in any government. Therefore, the author’s wants to point out that the use of an authoritative revolutionary model in a totalitarian system cannot lead to development of a just state (Koestler,

Open Document