Daisy Buchanan In The Great Gatsby By F. Scott Fitzgerald

2039 Words5 Pages

What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. However, if it were called “duckweed” or “skunk cabbage,” would its aroma be enough to establish it as a universal symbol of romantic love? What about that which we call a daisy- or she whom we call Daisy Buchanan? Duckweed Buchanan does not suggest simplicity, innocence, and beauty, as Daisy does. Shakespeare, father of symbolism and creator of half the words in the English language, knew the power of meticulously chosen vocabulary, as did literary mastermind F. Scott Fitzgerald. In The Great Gatsby, there is no Sneezewart or Turkey Corn Buchanan. The character is Daisy, and though her name implies a host of sweet attributes, she does not necessarily live …show more content…

Despite his attempts to be an unbiased writer, Nick falls into the trap of projecting his own ideas onto Daisy’s life. Daisy, to her cousin, is shallow sweetness and sheltered innocence and rich beauty- and when she reveals her imperfect nature, Nick can no longer think kindly of her. His feelings towards Daisy are blatantly obvious. He goes on about her “exhilarating,” “thrilling,” “murmurous” voice, a perfect expression of her beauty, but hardly ever takes to heart what she is saying (86, 9, 105). When she confesses to her sophistication and cynicism, Nick cannot take her seriously and interprets her feelings as foolish idealism, “as if she had asserted her membership in a rather distinguished secret society to which she and Tom belonged” (18). When Gatsby asserts that “Her voice is filled with money,” Nick has a revelation that all Daisy embodies is the wealth oozing from her pores (120). After this and her forced confession to being neither sweet nor innocent because of her affair with Gatsby, Daisy’s voice is changed in Nick’s mind. It is no longer beautiful, but “cold” and full of “thrilling scorn” (133, 132). Though he had respected her before, Nick now thinks she and her husband are both “careless people, ... they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept …show more content…

He has it all- a beautiful mansion, enough money that he could blow it on weekly extravaganzas, and the aura of a millionaire. But he is missing something, something within himself he had lost in those five years. He thinks- he knows- he will find it with Daisy. While Gatz wanted Daisy to finalize his illusion of Gatsby, Gatsby wants Daisy to turn him back into a person. Even Nick notices it, observing that, “he wanted to recover something, some idea of himself perhaps, that had gone into loving Daisy. His life had been confused and disordered since then, but if he could once return to a certain starting place to go over it all slowly, he could find out what that thing was...” (111-112) Floundering in the amoral, semi-legal underworld of the rich in the Roaring Twenties, Gatsby needs Daisy because she can return him to a better time when he was simply James Gatz from the Middle West. It is integral to his plans that Daisy approves of everything he had done, and “he revalued everything in his house according to the measure of response it drew from [Daisy’s] well-loved eyes” (92). Gatsby has a plan: he must take everything and return to Louisville, where everything is right in the world, marry Daisy from her house “just as if it were five years ago,” and find the missing pieces of himself (111). When Daisy dashes his plans by rescinding her claim that she never loved Tom, Gatsby cannot accept

Open Document