Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of mass media on individuals
Effect of mass media on individuals
Effect of mass media on individuals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of mass media on individuals
My profile page is constantly reflecting culture industry especially as a young adult by what I wear, what I write and the images I allow my audience to see. Culture industry is the things we consume to express our identity, like the things we buy seen in the media or in politics. We fail to realize is that all products are alike an exist to promote themselves and the system thy represent. As a result it becomes the ‘freedom to chose what is always the same’. Advertisinig compets with each other for the best sells on the same product only difference is a logo or brand name being attached to it. “Culture is a paradoxical commodity” (Lemert,167) Culture represents exchange value, distracting us from our normal life struggles over power and resources. Adorno and Hoerkheimer argues that culture produces fake individuality. By …show more content…
Another example where culture industry is producing fake individuality would be our views on dating. Our expectation of what our perfect match should act and look like comes from the media and Disney movies we watched as kids. The expression of love is boxed in so when a new form of love comes along we don’t know how to except and just cast it out. Herbert Marcuse introduces the cycle of stupefaction where we work until stupefied and then relax with Television. The things we see on television and on social media promote happy consciousness, the capitalist consume culture produces the false needs, and we feel as though we need this specific item when in all actuality we don’t. Like the makeup and new trendy clothing seen all down the public wall we see it and think to stay up to date in culture (to be relevant) I must have it. Macurase also draws from Freud’s logic on how our own social reality forces people to discipline their basic impulses and it sublimates the impulses into acceptable
Culture is an essential part of every human being. People can fall under the category of one culture or they can fall under many. Values derived from culture tend to reflect in an individual’s or a society’s understanding of what is wrong and right. In culture, there are many significant features. Some are material, such as food and clothing, and non-material, such as beliefs and ideas. These material and non-material objects help to push people into powerful roles and they maintain the power. With the power these people then have a strong influence on the beliefs and ideas of the lower people. They have the ability to alter and change their beliefs at any time and most times, they follow along with it. These ideas and thoughts have been in place for many decades, since cultural theorists, such as Marx and Habermas, began explaining them. They have been a thought for decades
Identity is defined as being oneself and not acting or being something else. The identity that one forms throughout their life time is a slow and tedious process, each and every event in one’s life whether it’s larger or small scale has an effect on developing ones overall identity. In the play Only Drunks and Children Tell the Truth by Drew Hayden Taylor, Janice it caught between two identities and struggles to find a happy medium. Being adopted into a white family at a young age, Janice has become accustom to many of the white traditions and ways. Janice’s native family has recently gotten in touch with her and has put a great deal of pressure on her to regain some of the native culture she was born into. With pressure building Janice begins to question her identity and begins to show signs that she wants nothing to do with her native roots. Drew Hayden Taylor does an excellent job in this play showing how stereotypes and pre-conceived notions affect ones identity and their relationships within society. Each character within the play shows how their identity has been shaped through the relationships they have acquired throughout their lives; Tonto’s identity is heavily influenced by his father and best friend Rodney, Barb is influenced by the customs and traditional ways of her mother, and Janice after being adopted at a young age has formed an identity revolving around that of her adopted parents but she faces a great deal of pressure from her native birth family.
It has become impossible to avoid marketing and branding. Everywhere a consumer turns, they are being persuaded and influenced by all sorts of symbols, logos, slogans etc. These aspects of a brand create the culture we live in. “The effect, if not always the original intent, of advanced branding is to nudge the hosting culture into the background and make the brand the star. It is not to sponsor culture but to be the culture.” 30 no logo. Humanity has become one large sponsored event, making it impossible in order to escape.
According to Webster’s Dictionary, culture is defined as tradition or a way of life. It is also a defining principle in how we live our life and the type of people we become. The Salish Indians of the Montana and Celie, the main character of the book The Color Purple, are two examples of cultures that made them who they are. Celie is a poor, black, woman growing up in Memphis, Tennessee in the mid-twentieth century. The men have constantly put her down, through beatings and rape, for being a woman with no talent at all. Her husband’s lover comes to town and gives Celie a chance to see a culture where a woman can stand up for herself and teaches her that love is possible. The Salish on the other hand have a culture that has gone on through the ages and still is a part of each person today despite the obstacles they have had to face. Culture does shape us because from birth it is what tells us our ideals, laws, and morals that we live by each day.
In the essays that we have been reading, there is a consist theme that has been occuring. This consist theme has been that there are people who are in power, and that their conscience has been covered by hot iron, becuase their minds are being controlled by their love for money, and that they have screwed up the way that the world works in the pursuit of money. The first assignment that we had was to watch the “Story of Stuff” and then had to talk about it. In the “Story of Stuff”, the main idea was that corporations cared about one thing and one thing only, making the most money, even if that meant destroying human lives and destroying the planet. In the next assignment, we had to read Naomi Klein’s essay “No Logo”, in which she tells us that the corporations found that they could make money without making any products, instead they made something called “brands”, which were nothing but concepts that did not require them to make the actual products. So instead they had several companies that treated their workers without any respect, but could make the products for the corporations at cheap costs. And in the essay “Iron Maiden” written by Jacobson and Mazur, the authors tell us about how the media has created an environment in which women honestly believe that only when they buy “brands” and torture their bodies to the horrors of unnecessary cosmetic surgery. And all of this is because there is a group of people, who have their morals controlled by their love of money, and that they have a race for who can own the most things and that nothing can get in their way, and all of this is shown by the essays that we have been studying.
He makes a point that the culture industry is equivalent to the capitalists’ entertainment industry and business. The culture industry is responsible for recreating products that people associate with the most in the same format as previous products, which become standardised which then leads to pseudo-individualisation. According to Adorno and Horkheimer, the culture industry repeatedly expose products of pleasure which become standardised in society. In his article titled “A Social Critique of Radio Music”, Adorno discusses how the reproduction and recreation of music have become standardised and that listener virtually have no choice as products are being forced upon them.
Theodore Adorno and Max Horkheimer were two renowned Jewish representatives of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory; they were particularly dominant during the early 20th century, approximately around the time of the 1920’s to 1960s. They took refuge in America after Adolf Hitler’s rise in Germany. These to philosophers developed the ‘Culture Industry Theory’ in the 1940s, in light of the disturbed society they had seen during this time. They witnessed how Nazi Fascism used mass media such as films, radio and newspapers to brainwash millions into partaking in this ideology. Similarly they saw the rise of Capitalism in America, which also used mass media such as Hollywood films and advertising to disseminate the masses into the capitalist Ideology. This essay will evaluate how the ‘culture industry’ had profound social impacts in society and examine weather it is valid in contemporary society.
The Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition defines Culture as the “shared patterns of behaviors and interactions, cognitive constructs, and affective understanding that are learned through a process of socialization. These shared patterns identify the members of a culture group while also distinguishing those of another group.” (Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition)
In the end, what we learn from this article is very realistic and logical. Furthermore, it is supported with real-life examples. Culture is ordinary, each individual has it, and it is both individual and common. It’s a result of both traditional values and an individual effort. Therefore, trying to fit it into certain sharp-edged models would be wrong.
The Role of Culture in Shaping us as Individuals Culture has a big impact on how we all fit in as individuals in today’s society, and since this assignment is about that I decided to include some of my own experiences to illustrate my point of view and compare it with those of my classmates and some of the readings. My family and I moved to United States in 1998 from Albania. My parents believed that I and my sister would get a better education here and also it would be useful and interesting to learn another language and its culture.
There is many different factors that determine personality and development, from environmental, genetics, and of course, the culture someone grows up. This can vary across the globe in different geological locations. It is impossible to say how much influence culture has on specific psychological development or personality. Some emotion such as happiness can be subjective and it is hard to measure the rate of happiness when contrasted with a different part of the world. Many scholars point out that wealthier and developed nations report higher feelings of well-being. (Eunkook M. Suh) Despite this association with income and well-being, there are other factors at play. In developed Western societies, they have more social services that could influence personal happiness within cultures.
Adorno and Horkheimer’s Culture Industry Argument is based around mass media and mass consumption. As the exchange value of objects increase consumers become obsessed with conforming to the ideal image and judging others if the fit into this mold. Impressions are taken from material possessions rather than personality traits. As capitalism takes control over people minds, the culture industry is turned into a commodity to be mass-produced and sold to masses. These causes can lead to many socio-psychological effects on society. People becoming internalized and not being able to form judgments for themselves as mass media is forcing opinions upon them by not giving the consumer time to reflect before reacting to information. The formation of mass media leads to consumers being manipulated and deceived by the media as information is standardized and a false sense of individualism created.
In conclusion to this essay it apparent that these two theories clashed. Fiske arguing for the people rejecting that culture can be critiqued allowing the people to feel responsible for their actions. As for McDonald leaving the audience feeling gloomy depressed with the fact that they like what they. McDonald makes it clear that if people are not choosing high culture they are halfwits. However Fiske argument is impartial leaving audience with the notion that they are determining culture since they are creating the popular culture chain even though they are at the
culture - is something that is supposed to be respected and cherished - each and everyone has a set of values that justifies its existence, however globalization allows us more diversity and possibilities to see new and vider wiews around the world.
This is one of the main differences between Fiske’s and MacDonald’s theories, while Fiske believes in the power of the consumer to decide what is popular culture and to decide how to consume it, MacDonald asserts that popular culture and mass culture are something that is force-fed to consumers and forces mass conformity. Although mass culture and popular culture do breed conformity it is very important not to ignore the choice and the power of the consumer. Counter-cultures are great evidence to show that choice. The hippies of the 70’s and the hipsters of today are two well-known examples of counter-cultures formed by people who were exposed to mainstream popular culture and mass culture and chose to deviate from it. Although mass culture and the very peer pressure like influence it has can be very hard to deviate from, but the choice is still there and MacDonald ignores that choice. When faced with the commodity of popular culture we as consumers have the power to deny it as individuals and to change it as a society whether or not we chose to use that power or to even realize we have