Culture Of Nationalism

892 Words2 Pages

Culture of nationalism is when there is a presence of commonalities among a population living in a certain territory or region. These commonalities can be made up of several factors such as rituals, traditions, religion, lifestyle, and ideas. Culture of nationalism is derived from the unification of practices by certain groups. Once a group realizes that a government of their own will allow for the improvement of their common goals, it can be argued that culture of nationalism can be observed. In order for populations to perceive that they have a common goal, they have to create a space where they are able to share their common goal. Two groups that have pertained a culture of nationalism and formed states are Israel and Palestine. Israel was …show more content…

During this time there were either empires or small political units. Empires were characterized as not having affiliations with everyday lives of the people, they were run by imperial elites and didn't impose uniformity. The empires chose not to create a unified state and as a result, statesmen were able to find a way to overcome empires. Kings and statesmen found it more beneficial to harness the power of the people being ruled because that is where the power lies. Harnessing this social power would allow these rulers to protect themselves and at the same time become more powerful. Rulers wanted to harness this power by giving the people being ruled a common interest. By implementing rules and regulations that provided citizenship to the people, the people were able to return loyalty and the power the rulers desired. One method of creating a culture of nationalism is by making the population participate in a division of labor so that they can feel like a cog in a larger machine. Nationalism was not an idea, but instead practices that became normalized by the population. State rulers were able to do this by creating legal codes, education systems, armies and other activities that the population would be able to practice daily (Gelvin, pg 17). Essentially by creating a culture of nationalism, rulers create states that act on the culture of nationalism and the people are able to create …show more content…

These communities were expanding at a greater rate than non-Jewish communities. Russia had few Jews but then it took over countries that had high Jewish populations. There was more contact with Jews which allowed diffusion of ideas but at the same time anti semitism increased. In effect, more Jews were able to meet and this allowed them to distinguish themselves as a community. With the rise of the absolutist states, there was an elimination of mediated states. Non-mediated states meant that Jews were not able to live with the autonomy they once used to(Gelvin 37). This eventually led to Jewish Emancipation, which is the acceptance of Jews into states as citizens. Jews were treated like normal citizens and as a result Jews began to feel more attached to the country they lived in. By having Jews as national citizens, states were able to harness more people

Open Document