Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Vroom's Model of expectancy theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Vroom's Model of expectancy theory
Critique of Two Journal Articles on Motivation
Expectancy theory is one of the most widely used motivation theory. It is first proposed by Victor Vroom Yale School of Management in 1964. This theory is well supported by many evidence, and believe that the degree how people would act in a certain way depends on the strength of an expectation that the act will be followed by a given outcome, and on the attractiveness of that outcome to the individual.(Robbins et al. 2008) Two research-based articles which used expectancy theory to examine the factors impact target object in different circumstances are compared in this critique article.
These two articles are both scholarly and on the base of research in universities from U.S. And they also have similar aims toward different objects. The aim of Chen Y et al (2006) article is to examine key factors that motivate members of business faculty to increase productivity of research by applying expectancy theory. To reach this aim, authors investigated 10 business schools in U.S, test several propositions. The primary aim of Geiger M et al (1998) article is to use expectancy theory to assess motivation of accounting student in non-U.S. cultures. This article also tests expectancy theory if it is effective in multinational setting. This is because two studies which have similar aim had been conducted before this article in the United States. Both articles clearly expressed their content though their articles’ titles. In addition, this article tested whether Hofstede’s five culture indices related to expectancy theory or not. Hence, Geiger et al (1998) article clearly have broader horizon of subject. And by skimming the titles, reader could easily catch the main purposes within these...
... middle of paper ...
...ticle is Hofesded’s culture dimensions were tested to be considerably correlated with expectancy theory components that were examined. It proved that motivation of students is culturally affected. This finding provided a way that motivating students from different cultures to perform better by using various motivators.
Reference
Chen Y, Gupta A, Hoshower L. (2006) Factors That Motivate Business Faculty to Conduct Research: An Expectancy Theory Analysis. Journal of Education for Business. 81, 4, pp. 179-189
Geiger M, Cooper E, Hussain I, O'Connell B, et al. (1998) Cross-cultural comparisons: Using expectancy theory to assess student motivation: An international replication. Accounting Education. 13, 1, pp 139-157
Geiger, M. A., and E. A. Cooper. 1996. Using expectancy theory to assess student
motivation. Issues in Accounting Education (Spring): 113-129
The plan paid out bonuses regularly along with paying a percentage of the labor savings each month. Which motivated all of the employees to increase their morale and increase their productivity. However, the only misleading part about the Scanlon plan was that the employees began to believe that the bonus was part of their regular paycheck, instead of relating the bonus with their own improved efforts they put into the company. Therefore, expectancy theory has been a dominant model in explaining how people make decisions regarding effort expenditure at a workplace; the conventional approach while applying the theory involved in multiplying the outcomes such as pay raise or promotion by expectancy of an outcome that will occur if a person works hard. (Biberman, G., Baril, G. L., & Kopelman, R. E., 1986, p.2). Furthermore, the results in the expectancy theory would be obtained by a motivational force score that would possibly predict work effort and job performance across the employees. So, it is ideal that the employees would respond in a positive manner to the following three essentials for them to employ extra effort and performance on a specific job. The three essentials are the following: expectancy, instrumentality and valence are linked to motivation. If an employee feels valued and rewarded for the efforts they’ve
...Should We Do about Motivation Theory? Six Recommendations for the Twenty-First Century. The Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 388-403. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20159050
Described by DuBrin, (2013, p. 306), looking at leader’s roles at enhancing motivation more broadly, Jean Houston, an Atlanta based human recourse consultant, says that managers can engage their workers by seeing them, as whole people and courageous conversations that builds trust and sees what is really going on. Expectancy theory is a good starting point to learning how leaders can apply systematic explanations of motivation, for two main reasons. First, the theory is comprehensive: it incorporates and integrates features of other motivation theories, which include goal theory and behavior modification. Second, it offers the leader many guidelines for initiating and sustaining constructive effort from group members. DuBrin (2013, p. 308),
Maintaining an organization effectiveness and efficiency in a global changing environment possesses many challenges for the organization to advance its processes. Research in this situation can be very time consuming, some research can conflict with other research, and Meta-analysis can add value to this dilemma combining research into systematic reviews of statistical quantitative results. One such challenge is the value of theoretical driven empirical research, and when organizations apply “tactic and experience based knowledge” a gap exist between the academia and practical function of the organization (Lawler & Mohrman, 2011). This gap becomes minimized or closed with the relationship and familiarity of academia
Yet, despite the criticism, Herzberg’s theory still holds merit in many managerial situations. Experts have built their theories on the foundations of the motivator-hygiene theory to better explain worker motivation. Among the most prominent is the expectancy theory or Victor
Keller, John M. (2006). What Are the Elements of Learner Motivation? Retrieved July 4, 2011
Topping, P. A (2002). Coaching: Motivating associates. In Managerial Leadership (pp. 98-103). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Steers, Richard M., Richard T. Mowday, and Debra L. Shapiro. "Introduction to Special Topic Forum: The Future of Work Motivation Theory." The Academy of Management Review 29.3 (2004): 379. Print.
Organizations everywhere use different methods to push members of their organization to complete various tasks on a daily basis. Whether these approaches are successful or not successful, displays how effective the organization’s motivating factors really are. Motivation is an essential element that must be incorporated into every organization to ensure that goals are accomplished and so that members of the organization always stick to their mission. James Porter and Lyman Porter define motivation as “the degree and type of effort that an individual exhibits in a behavioral situation…and has to do with the direction and quality of that effort” (Perry, 2005). People often wonder what factors cause an individual to perform their job in a certain
Motivation play an important role in today’s work environment as motivated employees are more productive employees. However, the ways how we motivate the employees have to be improved from time to time as employees are being more demanding and that they are more concern about their needs than before. Motivational strategies have probably affected the most by employee concerns and values (Greiner 1986, p. 82). ‘A motivational strategy is any effort to induce employees to initiate and sustain activities that can directly or indirectly improve service productivity’ (Greiner 1986, p. 82). Motivation can have an effect on the output of your business and concerns both quantity and quality. For example, if you are in a manufacturing company, your business actually relies heavily on your production staff to make sure that quality product are being produce and being delivered to your client at the right time. However, if your production employees are lack of motivation they will be not motivated to produce the amount of product demanded, thus will be very costly. In the essay below, we will be discussing on the strength and weaknesses of McClelland’s acquired needs theory and the expectancy theory.
Benabou, R. & Tirole, J. (2003) Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation', The Review of Economic Studies, vol.70, pg.489-520.
According to Robbins, DeCenzo, and Coulter (2011) “motivation is the process by which a person’s efforts are energized, directed, and sustained toward attaining a goal” (p. 267). Organizations are always looking for new ways to motivate employees. In a global economy it is important to understand that cultural differences can impact how an organization can motivate its employees. Geert Hofstede (as cited in Sledge, Miles, & Coppage, 2008) believed there are five dimensions of culture. These five dimensions are power distance, individualism versus collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity versus femininity, and Confucian dynamism (p. 1670). This paper will discuss each dimension of culture and how they could effect employee motivation.
In the words of Atkinson and Feather (1966) , “The strength of motivation to perform some act is assumed to be a multiplicative function of the strength of the motive, the expectancy (subjective probability) that the act will have as a consequence the attainment of an incentive, and the value of the incentive: Motivation = f(Motive X Expectancy X Incentive)”.
In daily life, we need motivation to improve our performance in our job or in studies. Motivation is an internal force, dependent on the needs that drive a person to achieve. In the other words, motivation is a consequence of expectations of the future while satisfaction is a consequence of past events (Carr, 2005). We need to give reward to our self when we did correctly or we has achieve our target. Reward is something that we are given because we have behaved well, worked hard, or provided a service to the community. Theories of motivation can be used to explain the behavior and attitude of employees (Rowley, 1996; Weaver, 1998). The theories include content theories, based on assumptions that people have individual needs, which motivate their action. Meanwhile according to Robbins (2001), motivation is a needs-satisfying process, which means that when a person's needs are satisfied by certain factors, the person will exert superior effort toward attaining organizational goals. Schulze and Steyn (2003) affirmed that in order to understand people’s behavior at work, managers or supervisors must be aware of the concept of needs or motives which will help “move” their employees to act.Theories such as Maslow (1954), McClelland (1961), Herzberg (1966) and Alderfer (1969) are renowned for their works in this field. The intrinsic reward or also be known as motivators factors is the part of Herzberg motivation theory. Motivators are involve factors built into the job or the studies itself such as achievement, recognition, responsibility and advancement. Hygiene factors are extrinsic to the job such as interpersonal relationship, salary, supervision and company policy (Herzberg, 1966. There have two factors that are called hygiene fac...
The next theory is expectancy theory of motivation: expectancy theory of motivation suggest that we think about our future. We create different expectations about what is going to happen next, and we always want a positive outcome. We believe that we have the ability to get the best. This motivate us to work hard in order to achieve the goal towards we work. This theory of motivation is the best tool for students because if we hope then only we can work. If we use expectancy theory to motivate our students then we can aspect that each student have their own goal and positive expectation to achieve good