Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay courtroom observation
The role of judges and lawyers
Essay on courtroom observation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay courtroom observation
Last week I began my externship with the Metro Public Defender’s Office. I, along with fellow externs, spent Wednesday shadowing public defenders throughout a typical day in the Justice A. A. Birch Building. This was my first time in the Nashville courthouse, and really the first time I witnessed criminal proceedings that were not part of an actual trial. Over the summer I had the opportunity to witness two trials, but one of the main reasons I wanted to work with the public defender was because the vast majority of the criminal justice systems exists outside the trial. I was quickly struck (and repeatedly struck again and again) by how boring and efficient the system is. Almost everything that takes place within a courtroom is essentially a procedural formality. Judges are seemingly there to ensure that defendants agreed to a plea deal voluntarily and that they understand the rights they have subsequently waived. There really isn’t much room for defense attorneys to advocate inside the actual courtroom. However, later in the day I witnessed a pretrial preceding that provided me with a lesson I’ll never forget. …show more content…
They were all charged after blocking an entrance to the Nashville city capitol building during the Presidential inauguration and they were here today for a probable cause hearing. The hearing itself, as a public defender explained to me, was a formality. Probable cause is a much lower standard than the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard used at trial. The protesters were arrested by police mid-protest. The prosecutor had no need to put on a full case and thus only put on the two arresting officers to answer just enough questions to put the defendants at the scene. This should have been the end of the hearing. Probable cause had been established and there was nothing the defense attorney could
(3 points) What kind of defenses has the defendant raised? Or, if the case is over, what defenses did the defendant raise? If not clear in the article, what are the likely defenses?
“Corruption is like a ball of snow, once it’s set a rolling it must increase (Charles Caleb Colton).” Colton describes that once corruption has begun, it is difficult to stop. Corruption has existed in this country, let alone this very planet, since the beginning of time. With corruption involves: money, power, and favoritism. Many people argue today that racism is still a major problem to overcome in today’s legal system. American author (and local Chicago resident) Steve Bogira jumps into the center of the United States justice system and tells the story of what happens in a typical year for the Cook Country Criminal Courthouse, which has been noted as one of the most hectic and busiest felony courthouses in the entire country. After getting permission from one of the courthouse judges’ (Judge Locallo) he was allowed to venture in and get eyewitness accounts of what the American Legal System is and how it operates. Not only did he get access to the courtroom but: Locallo’s chambers, staff, even his own home. In this book we get to read first hand account of how America handles issues like: how money and power play in the court, the favoritism towards certain ethnic groups, and the façade that has to be put on by both the defendants and Cook County Workers,
Holten, N. G. & Lamar, L. L. (1991). The Criminal Courts Structures, Personnel, and Processes. Florida: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
they were right. There is no hearing for the victim, and if they are innocent,
The Supreme Court judged this as from the time of their arraignment and beginning of the trial, they had no opportunity for consultation, through investigation of the claims or any preparation; ultimately, they had no aid or counsel of any real kind (Powell v. Alabama,
During my observation, the courtroom had its sections of prosecutors, defense attorneys, courtroom clerks, bailiffs, the judge and the families of the defendants who’s hearings where scheduled for that day. One thing I notice was once the defendants entered the courtroom; one of the clerks calls the defendants name and speaks to them in private along with the attorney they were appointed with. The defendant has the constitutional right to have an attorney present with them during their hearing and at trial. Majority of the cases that day were resolved with a plea bargain, which is the agreement between the defense and the prosecution in which the defendant pleads guilty to the charges and receives little punishment then what was initially given if the defendant decided to go to trial. One of the defendants was charged with DUI and property damage, as a result the defendant accepted a plea bargain of a
The “GIDEON’S ARMY” film documentary follows the personal stories of Travis Williams, Brandy Alexander and June Hardwick, three young public defenders who struggle against extensive working hours, little wage and awe-inspiring caseloads so common that even the most dedicated in the profession frequently give up in their first year of labor. From watching this film it has come to fruition in my mind that only a select few can do what these young men and women put up with on a weekly basis. In the film all three public defenders attempt to provide high quality representation despite the overwhelming odds against them. They all have from top to bottom student loan debt which causes an extraordinary amount of stress to them and other public defenders in the profession. This film was also very depressing. Just from watching this film for a couple of minutes one can get very down on themselves. By the time I was done observing it I had to turn on a more motivational show because the film was really that disheartening. The Stakes were incredibly high for the defendants which faced some of t...
In the movie, Billy and Stan believe they are being questioned for shoplifting, however the sheriff has them in custody for the murder of the gas station attendant. In reality, the sheriff did not see the crime being committed, so he should have waited for a warrant from a judge in order to bring them in, and he should have told them immediately the crime he thought they committed. This being the case, the preliminary hearing is overlooked. If it were to be included, the movie would not exist, or it would be about two hours shorter, due to the fact that the main purpose of this step is “to make sure the police have not arrested the wrong person” (2015). This is normally held after the arrest, but as we know is left out, in order to prolong the movie. We then move to the arraignment, which in the movie, Vinny has a rough time getting to the main point of this step. The main point of this step is simply to decide if the defendant is going to plead “guilty” or not “not guilty”. Bail is also determined at this step. According to Miller “Bail is money a defendant has to provide to guarantee his or her attendance at trial” (2015). Since the boys cannot afford the large amount of bail set upon them by the Judge, they are forced to wait in jail until their trial
I've researched about the volunteer program in phoenix, and it is named COPS "Citizens Offering Police support" This program is running through out all Phoenix Arizona departments. The volunteer organization is dedicated to helping the Phoenix Police Department and the community. Today, they have almost 200 volunteers working in a variety of units within COPS department. They also have university and college students interns working on their career paths with program. The COPS Program brings the community into the police family. Volunteers working shoulder to shoulder with police officers and our support staff can see the difficulty and value of the police mission. Although it isn't easy to just become apart of the support system, it's more
First off, the Supreme Court of Canada, although not as interesting as the Elgin St. Courthouse, was very interesting nonetheless. When we had arrived at approximately 9:30 in the morning, I did not know what to expect, what I was going to see. And, as we entered the courthouse—in a single file—I could not help but chuckle at the extreme security measures, and why they were put into place. Ten minutes later, after the tour guide had finished speaking, he had asked for volunteers to be involved in the mock trial. I was hesitant at first, but I decided to play the part of the lawyer at the end. As a result, I was to defend a victim of a shoe robbery, and put my acting skills to the test. At first, I read the script word for word, but soon afterwards, I became so comfortable with the hypothetical case that, by the end, I was capable of making my own closing statement without the script. In doing so, I felt like I was in a law show, fighting off crooks and giving them their deserved punishment. As a matter of fact, at the end, the defendant and I had one the case. On the whole, the Supreme Court of Canada and the mock trial in particular enhanced my field trip courthouse experience.
The ideal and most effective response to any question is that of a single, straightforward answer, but when dealing with a matter as profound and complex as the criminal justice system, a single answer feels wholly insubstantial. As a consequence, rather than explaining which model of justice that I would like the English and Welsh criminal justice system to embody, I will explain why I would most like to see a criminal justice system, that embodies both models in a reactive and dynamic manner, not dissimilar to the current system in place.
Justice can be interpreted in several different ways. Most people believe that justice is when someone commits a crime, they need to get what they deserve and should be sentenced to years in prison. The reason that people believe this comes from years ago when a person would have their hand cut off for stealing, or if a someone committed murder, they would be killed themselves. Times have changed over the years and several researches have been conducted throughout the years and according to Schmalleger (2012) justice is about fairness, “moral rightness” or “truth in action” (pg. 7). Justice is not only about fairness, rightness or truth, it is about trying to repair the wrongs that one has done and give guidance to prevent any wrongs from happening again. The criminal justice system tries to deter individuals from committing crimes and after some research was conducted it was noted that incarceration is not a deterrent from committing crimes (Vanenburgh, 2004). There still needs to be the fact that all individuals must be held accountable for their actions and they do need to have consequences for breaking the law and the punishment should fit the crime. Justice is about how to balance the crime, the punishment to fit the crime, be fair with the punishment as well as providing the victims with the relief that justice was served. When trying to seek justice it is apparent that everyone looks at the facts that are involved in the case to determine how justice should be done. Some facts that might be looked at could be the defendants childhood situation, what situations may have caused the crime to be committed, does the defendant suffer from any mental illness and the defendants criminal history are good facts to take into considera...
When I first applied for my internship at the Public Defender’s Office I had thought that the interaction among the jailers and other jail administrators would be the most relatable to the material discussed in class. Unexpectedly, I discovered that the interaction among the legal staff at the office was particularly relevant to my studies, epitomizing the interplay between the legal and public professions; all of the caveats, exceptions, and limitations that are associated with operating in the public sector melded with the intricacies and absurdities of criminal defense law. Elements of budgeting, ethics management, and personnel management were demonstrated in the office, ranging from the resignation of an attorney to the scarcity of essential office furniture and equipment. In addition to the administrative aspects of my work at the office, the opportunity to interview potential clients at the county jail helped expand my world view.
The courtroom is a place where cases are heard and deliberated as evidence is produced to prove whether the accused person is innocent or guilty. Different courtroom varies depending on the hierarchy and the type of cases, they deliberate upon in the courtroom. In the United States, the courts are closely interlinked through a hierarchical system at either the state or the federal level. Therefore, the court must have jurisdiction before it takes upon a case, deliberate, and come up with a judgment on it. The criminal case is different from the civil cases, especially when it comes to the court layout. In this essay, I will explain how I experienced a courtroom visit and the important issues are learnt from the visit.
In Intro to Criminal Justice class, I had the opportunity to learn about the Criminal Justice System more thoroughly. I learned that there are three components that make up the Criminal Justice System such as the courts, law enforcement, and corrections. Each component has its own role in making sure the the Criminal Justice System is functioning properly. If one of these components are not efficient the Criminal Justice system will not be as strong as it could be.