Creationism Should Not Be Taught In Public Schools Essay

1299 Words3 Pages

Creationism, and evolution have been challenging each other since Charles Darwin published his work in 1859. Creationism is the belief that an all powerful being created the world, and how it works was all to his design. The main example of creationism will be Christianity. Evolution is the belief that over centuries of time species adapt in a more fitting organism for their environment. The most macroevolution would be primates becoming humans. In an ideal classroom environment all origin stories of the earth would be a class able to be taught in a high school setting as an elective. An example of this that is in use today would be mythology class. It explains how the world was created in a non-evolution based ways. Although this is the ideal, and wouldn't be possible due to social backlash as …show more content…

The biggest legal reason that creationism should not be taught is in the constitutions first amendment which states Church and State must remain separate. Many creationist tried to pass laws to get both creationism, and evolutionism taught within a science course. Having said that the Supreme Court still found it unconstitutional on multiple occasions. As it was not teaching to inform, but creationism was being taught in the hopes of promoting creationism, and such God. Evolution does not require creationism to work, but creationism does require some evolution to be evident as previously stated from the intelligent design theorists. As quoted in What should schools teach by Kathiann M, Kowalski shares quotes from Stephen J. Gould. “Does evolutionary theory deny God’s existence? ‘Certainly not,’ Gould replied. ‘Evolution as a science does not talk about the existence of a creator,’ he added. ‘It is quite consistent with or without one, so long as the creator works by natural laws.’” Gould was a renowned expert in this topic, and was brought in to consult the Supreme Court about such cases on creationism in

Open Document