Corporate Crime Case Study

“Ask why.” This was the slogan for the company Enron—a company riddled with corporate crime. The documentary Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room describes the corrupt practices of this once seventh-largest company in the United States. Examining this film allowed me to “ask why” this company engaged in these criminal practices, and why corporate crime exists, in general. Currently, there is no real theory attempting to explain white collar crime, so instead, in this essay I will be looking at 5 different factors that I believe are helpful for understanding corporate crime including: corporate culture, the drive for profit, the structure of organizations, socialization and learning, as well as a motivated and persuasive leader. The first

While this is a type of corporate culture, it plays a significant enough role in corporate crime that I’m going to touch on it individually. The goal of most every company is to make a profit, but when corporate profit is put above all else, it can easily lead to corporate crime. The phrases ‘profit over people’ and ‘money over morality’ come to mind here, especially when thinking about Enron. One example of Enron putting company profits above all else occurred during the California Energy Crisis. Enron traders learned that by manually shutting down power plants they could create artificial power shortages during California’s already occurring energy crisis. This would send energy prices sky rocketing. These traders would then bet on the price of energy rising, which it did, making them around 2 billion dollars. While those at Enron were fixated on the drive for profit, they were unconcerned with the consequences these outages had such as people getting stuck in elevators, fatal car crashes due to traffic light malfunctions, and deadly

This describes the diffusion of responsibilities within companies and departmental isolation. Having certain departments within a company isolated, with their own specific responsibilities can allow for deniability in the face of wrongdoing, as well difficulties in pin-pointing blame. In the case of Enron, during the oil scandal, two traders were recklessly gambling company money. When this was making the company millions, Ken Lay, the CEO, was informed of the actions but let them continue. Once this led to the company losing money, Ken Lay was able to claim he was unware of the reckless nature and that he couldn’t be blamed for something he did not know