Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Case study in Business law relating to contract
Case study in Business law relating to contract
Contract case law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Case study in Business law relating to contract
Contract Law Case Study Both the parties in the question have come to a problematic situation which is complicated to resolve. Friend's of the Forest (Friends), represented by Christabel, is involved in a commercial trade with Paper Supplies Pty Ltd (Paper) which is represented by Dee. A contract needs four essential elements to exist. In the situation, it is obvious that the four elements are satisfied. As the details are not fully provided, it is arguable as to when the contract was formed which will affect the legal rights and obligations of both parties. The first main issues to be discussed regarding the contract is whether is the exemption clause binding and enforceable, is the document contractual in nature, and was the exemption clause a term of the contract. It is arguable that the contract was formed only after the goods and delivery note had been delivered, and Christabel retained the goods without making any objection to the conditions on the note. But this did not mean that all conditions contained in the note were terms of the contract. It was not possible for Christabel to negotiate the terms in the document as it was delivered by the driver and is reasonable to assume that the driver is not an agent of Paper. Thus, Christabel could not negotiate the terms with Dee.[1] Nevertheless, Christabel did sign the document which will become binding as the fact that a person that has signed a document is strong evidence that the person has agreed to be bound by it. In the case of L'Estrange v F Graucob Ltd, Mrs L'Estrange signed a document cont... ... middle of paper ... ... the payment of the delivery. In reliance, Christabel acted on the faith of the assumption and manage to calm down the unsatisfied clients and she will suffer detriment if Dee reneges on the promise. In conclusion, Christabel's claims for damages and breach of warranty will most likely be approved based on facts and cases given above. Bibliography * Latimer, P. Australian Business Law, CCH Australia Ltd (latest edition), 2001 * Sweeney, B. & O'Reilly, J. Law in Commerce, Butterworths, 2001 http://images.lib.monash.edu.au/mgw1010/04105503.pdf --------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd [1988] I AII ER 348 (Court of Appeal) [2] Sweeney and Oreily (2001) pp. 214-215 [3] Latimer (2001) p. 222
When discussing the concept of contract law, there exist two bodies of legal rules that may apply to the contract. These bodies are the common law of contracts and Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code or the UCC. The common law of contracts is court made and is constantly changing, but the UCC is required in every state within the U.S.A. It is important to know which one to use and when, as well as what the differences between them are.
Alfalfa, a novice rock climber, decided to go on a very difficult climb. Half way up, he found himself in trouble. Darla, a more experienced climber, at great peril to herself, rescued Alfalfa from almost certain serious injury, if not death. Alfalfa was so grateful for what Darla had done that he promised to send her a check for $1,000. Alfalfa failed to send the check and Darla sues him for breach of contract. Judgment for whom? Explain.
Max was negligent in failing to warn of Joe of the hazardous door, which caused Joe’s injury.
California and Hawaiian Sugar Company contracted Sun ship to build a vessel. The contract gave Sun Ship almost two years to complete the work. The contract contained a liquidated clause that required Sun Ship to pay 17,000 dollars per day for ever day that the ship was not delivered after the agreed date. The ship was delivered after eight and a half months after the agreed delivery date. During the period, the ship had not been delivered, California and Hawaiian Sugar Company suffered actual losses of 368,000 dollar. The defendant refused to pay the liquidated damages and the plaintiff brought an action to recover the damages.
Within in scenario A, Rhianna and Chris enter into a written contract in which Mr. Brown was to sell his knife collection for an agreed upon amount of $5,000 that was to be paid in 2 installments of $2500 dollars. The first payment was to be made when Rhianna picked up the knives from Mr. Brown and the second payment was to be made exactly one month later. The first legal issue at hand is if the written contract had a clause that stated whether or not an assignment could be made. Some contracts prohibit the move of assignment; others may require that the other party consent to this assignment. Because this isn’t stated, there is not way to prove whether or not this clause agrees. It gets tricky because Rhianna knowingly told Beyoncé
The scenario I have been given highlights the main complexity of contract law. It touches on issues such as unilateral contracts, revocation as well as advertisement. I will be advising Mick (claimant) answering: Whether Yummy chocolate is liable to give a year supply of chocolate as advertised?
A Theory of Justice is the magnum opus of 20th century social contract theorist and political philosopher, John Rawls. A bit of background into this work is that social contract theory had fallen out of favor with political scientists and philosophers since the last 18th century, with the success of the American Revolution and the apparent triumph of John Locke and Democracy. However, with the advent of modern globalization, the emergence of America as a superpower, but the growing concern of socio-economic disparity necessitated a revisiting of the social contract, what it means, how societies and governments were best constructed.
Richard Bennett has been the southeast regional vice president of the Centurion Media cable division for almost ten years. During this time he held his ethical and moral standards in high regards. The issue of this has challenged those ethical and moral standard for Bennett. Along with his high ethical standards, the team the Bennett has assembled has been working with him since he came vice president and they are strong connection to the surrounding area and communities where the do business. There are several areas of concern involved in this case. These areas of concern involve: the problem and its assessment, work environment, conflicts of interest, legality of a contract, motives, and ethical dilemmas.
(Insert Citation p 305). Consideration refers to the attained good or service agreed upon by each party under a contract. Contractual Capacity is the legal ability to enter into a binding agreement. Some factors that affect contractual capacity are: age, mental health and agreements under alcohol intoxication. Last but not least is the legal object, which means that for a contract to be enforceable it must be of legal intent and comply with public policy. If all of these factors are present in a contract, we can conclude that a binding contractual agreement exists and it is enforceable by law.
Don Bradish was recently hired to fix scheduling issues with the new company in which he works, The Fitzgerald Machine Company. There are a few relevant facts that were given in this case study. The first and foremost fact is Mr. Bradish was hired because the company is having issue with their scheduling. This is important because he comes in with a relevant degree and years of experience with a reputable company. He is going to be looked for to find a solution to the issue outlined in the case study. The second relevant fact in the case study is that the company that The Fitzgerald Machine Company is working with is having labor issues. This is considerable because the $300,000 order is a considerably large
Preparation for the negotiation took around forty minutes. The contract was breached by us (Wood Crafters) and there was no supporting document. Our options were bankruptcy or selling the house. The opening offer was made by Viking. Wood Crafters could see that Viking felt that they had the power/rights which led to the distributive approach. Initially, Viking was pushing for Wood Crafters to pay the over-run, the loan and the rent but Wood Crafters pushed against it. Wood Crafters argument was that the over-run project was approved by Viking secretary, therefore, Wood Crafters offer was to file a bankruptcy which believed to be the best option at the time. By filing a bankruptcy, Viking would not be
This case mentioned below is a fine example of understanding the Law of Contract in a better manner. (Gerald, 2014).
(P3.1) Liability is a burden or a party who is accountable for the breach. Contrast liability with contractual liability are both on the basis of failure to observe a duty imposed by law. One of them is an agreement and the other is by duty of performing and acting in a reasonable matter.
The issue in this case is whether there is a legally binding contract between Roland and Bernie. The things that needs to be considered is whether there is an agreement between Roland and Bernie. If there is an offer and acceptance, then there is an existence of agreement. According to Section 2(a) of the Contract Act 1950, offer can be defines as when one person implies his/her willingness to another in order to acquire their consent. (Abdullah et al, 2011) The person who make the offer is known as ‘offeror’ or ‘promisor’. (Lee and Detta, 2009) An offer can be made in the method of orally, by conduct, writing or by the mixture of these forms. An offer must require an effective communication with offeree. The formation of contract when offeree accepted the proposal. (Dass, 2005)
A valid contract is an agreement including promises made between two or more parties with an intention of certain legal rights and legal responsibility that are enforceable. For there to be a contract – that must contain four essential elements- offer, acceptance, intention to create legal relations and consideration.