Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social norms and their consequences on society
Brave new world revisited aldous huxley
Brave new world revisited aldous huxley
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social norms and their consequences on society
Conformity and Identity in Brave New World Essay
Society forms trivial connections to the individual and constructs a sense of hierarchy that is manifested within society. In Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, the characters of the dystopian society named the World State provides a diversified perspective on the effects of conformity. The World State replaces individual expression and forms an impression of identity for Bernard and Lenina. As a result of the World State’s perception of society, individual expression is only a mirror of societal expression. By oppressing compliant, identification, and internalization conformity, true societal stability can be better represented. In Brave New World, conforming with society will result in an unstable
…show more content…
A president-like figure, Mustapha Mond the World Controller, references the society's logic. “‘Stability,’ said the Controller, ‘stability. No civilization without social stability. No social stability without individual stability’” (Huxley 31). The Controller represents the whole of the society when he speaks of stability. By applying Lenina as an example, there is clear irony and hypocrisy in the Director’s premise. Lenina does not have a strong identity as her sense of self-worth is entirely dependant on the praise of others. With society’s praise, Lenina appears to have a strong identity, which is structured from her self-image. Without societal praise, Lenina fails to have a strong identity as she lacks appreciation from others. In the same way Lenina is conditioned, children are conditioned to be familiar with death and loss as to prevent the emotional trauma that results from it. This emotional detachment leads to a society that is materialistic and unable to attain true passion. Bernard realises this when he says, “‘I want to know what passion is,’ she heard him saying. ‘I want to feel something strongly’” (Huxley 63). Bernard attempts to find passion which is an example of individual expression. Instead of letting society pressure him into wanting stimulant soma and recreational …show more content…
The World State believes in a flawed practice that social stability depends on the individuals’ stability, which the self-doubt of Lenina and the chaotic mental journey of Bernard proves the great facade that the World State citizens live in. Expression of the self will be a mirror of societal expression controlled by the dystopian society, the World State, which is imposed upon by conditioning the youth to their “inevitable fates”. Bernard’s passion can be more effectively found through rejecting compliant, identification, and internalization conformity which will ultimately lead to a stronger society. The basis of the World State is formed upon preconceived ideas that will internally weaken the morals of the individuals as well as the perceptions they form of
“You should see how a negro ovary reacts to pituitary” is one of the several controversial quotes incorporated in the dystopian novel Brave New World. The author Aldous Huxley presents several stereotypes within the book, although not always consciously. The society in the book is sex and drug based, and everyone belongs into a certain inescapable caste. In this essay I will put forth three distinct points which support the idea that Aldous Huxley portrays social and racial stereotypes through his worldview. Whilst this novel was being written, the definition of race was biological, which means that race was purely based on your skin color. In today's society race has no biological factor as the distinct groups have more genetic variations within them than between them.
Several conflicting frames of mind have played defining roles in shaping humanity throughout the twentieth century. Philosophical optimism of a bright future held by humanity in general was taken advantage of by the promise of a better life through sacrifice of individuality to the state. In the books Brave New World, 1984, and Fahrenheit 451 clear opposition to these subtle entrapments was voiced in similarly convincing ways. They first all established, to varying degrees of balance, the atmosphere and seductiveness of the “utopia” and the fear of the consequences of acting in the non-prescribed way through character development. A single character is alienated because of their inability to conform – often in protest to the forced conditions of happiness and well being. Their struggle is to hide this fact from the state’s relentless supervision of (supposedly) everything. This leads them to eventually come into conflict with some hand of the state which serves as the authors voice presenting the reader with the ‘absurdity’ of the principles on which the society is based. The similar fear of the state’s abuse of power and technology at the expense of human individuality present within these novels speaks to the relevance of these novels within their historical context and their usefulness for awakening people to the horrendous consequences of their ignorance.
In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, the author depicts a collective society in which everyone has the same values and beliefs. From a young age, the people in the World State’s civilization are conditioned to believe in their motto of “Community, Identity, Stability.” Through hypnopaedia, the citizens of the World State learn their morals, values, and beliefs, which stay with them as they age. However, like any society, there are outsiders who alienate themselves from the rest of the population because they have different values and beliefs. Unfortunately, being an outsider in the World State is not ideal, and therefore there are consequences as a result. One such outsider is John. Brought from the Savage Reservation, John is lead to conform to the beliefs of the World State, thus losing his individuality, which ultimately leads him to commit suicide. Through John and the World State populace as an example, Huxley uses his novel to emphasize his disapproval of conformity over individuality.
Society Dies When Individuality Dies. Conformity plagues one’s existence and stature in today’s society. Due to government intervention in citizens’ daily lives, many writers have questioned the morality of conformity in a society by the means of control. When control becomes rampant, fascist and totalitarian governments are formed, and because of the rise in fascism and totalitarianism, many people are led to conform to social ideals. Therefore, George Orwell critiques conformity within society through the use of Big Brother, Proles, and Winston.
The characters in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World represent certain political and social ideas. Huxley used what he saw in the world in which he lived to form his book. From what he saw, he imagined that life was heading in a direction of a utopian government control. Huxley did not imagine this as a good thing. He uses the characters of Brave New World to express his view of utopia being impossible and detrimental. One such character he uses to represent the idealogy behind this is Bernard Marx.
The famous Milgram experiment focused on the conflict between blind obedience to authority and personal conscience. It turned out that 65% of ordinary people blindly follow orders given by an authority figure, and only 30% are able to follow their personal conscience (McLeod). Considering that the vast majority acquire blind obedience to authority just in the process of nurturing, imagine what would it be like if blind obedience is built into one’s nature? In the novel Brave New World, Aldous Huxley illustrates ways in which government and advanced science control society by conditioning embryos to blindly follow desirable social norms. Every conditioned individual would have merited instincts
Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World portrays a society in which science has clearly taken over. This was an idea of what the future could hold for humankind. Is it true that Huxley’s prediction may be correct? Although there are many examples of Huxley’s theories in our society, there is reason to believe that his predictions will not hold true for the future of society.
Brave New World is a novel about a dystopian society named “The World State” set in A.F. 632 (632 years after Henry Ford’s Death). In this society, advanced technology is used to mass produce people and condition them into only wanting and doing certain things, creating a caste system. However, doing so takes away people’s freedom to think for one’s self. Certain people are able to step back from the monotony of this society and because of this they feel detached. This scenario adds an element of alienation, this scenario poses as a question, is it better to be happy or individualistic.
The World State also uses controlled groupings of people to brainwash them further into thoughtless people with no sense of individualism. Lastly, the World State uses drugs to create artificial happiness for people, leaving no room for intense emotion which causes people to revolt against the World State. Within the novel Brave New World, it is seen that the World State eliminates individuality through social restrictions, government controlled groupings and the abuse of drugs to maintain control of the population. Social restriction robs individuals of their creative personalities by preventing freedom of thought, behavior, and expression; but is vital to the World State for maintaining complete control over the society. Social restriction’s purpose is to enforce obedience, conformity and compliance out of people.
Aldous Huxley is an author who creates this new and futuristic idea of a perfect society called the World State. A society that relies on technology and a drug called soma, that maintains stability and control, to achieve perfection. There is such a strategy as conditioning and hypnopaedia that is ensured in this society to establish a belief system of its own. The government is a dictatorship and this dictatorship controls all their lives and especially their emotions. They believe that by creating this sense of artificial happiness they are able to avoid people questioning what the truth is behind this society. Reading about this society and comparing it to the American society, there comes times where it is apparent that both societies do have similarities.
Social stability can be the cause of problems. After reading Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, we are informed that “Bokanovsky’s Process is one of the major instruments of social stability!” Now is it worth it? Is it worth the sacrifice? Questions like those are addressed throughout the book. Huxley wants to warn us of many things, for example the birth control pill, the way that we can colon ourselves and many other things. He wanted us to know that many of the experiments that they do to the caste in Brave New World, we were later going to do investigate more ourselves or start doing them to others. We have all, at a point; come to a point to the question where we ask ourselves “is it worth it? Is it worth the sacrifice?”
In Brave New World, Aldous Huxley deftly creates a society that is indeed quite stable. Although they are being mentally manipulated, the members of this world are content with their lives, and the presence of serious conflict is minimal, if not nonexistent. For the most part, the members of this society have complete respect and trust in their superiors, and those who don’t are dealt with in a peaceful manner as to keep both society and the heretic happy. Maintained by cultural values, mental conditioning, and segregation, the idea of social stability as demonstrated in Brave New World is, in my opinion, both insightful and intriguing.
In order to be an active member of society, it is crucial for one to develop a complete understanding of how one views and acknowledges the problems that plague the world in light of unique ideologies; this can be done through the reflections of one’s worldview in regards to society and individuality. In essence, a worldview is a composition of one’s perception in relation to the world. Even though people are unique individuals shaped by unparalleled influences, one can explain their personal worldview by comparing and contrasting their ideologies with worldviews obtained through analyzation of literature. For instance, Machiavelli’s sense of aggressiveness in relation to control which supports Coveys’ ideology of proactivity seams more reasonable
There were quite a few changes made from Aldous Huxley’s, Brave New World to turn it into a “made for TV” movie. The first major change most people noticed was Bernard Marx’s attitude. In the book he was very shy and timid toward the opposite sex, he was also very cynical about their utopian lifestyle. In the movie Bernard was a regular Casanova. He had no shyness towards anyone. A second major deviation the movie made form the book was when Bernard exposed the existing director of Hatcheries and Conditioning, Bernard himself was moved up to this position. In the book the author doesn’t even mention who takes over the position. The biggest change between the two was Lenina, Bernard’s girlfriend becomes pregnant and has the baby. The screenwriters must have made this up because the author doesn’t even mention it. The differences between the book and the movie both helped it and hurt it.
They program these humans to have needs and desires that will sustain a lucrative economy while not thinking of themselves as an individual. Huxley describes the World State’s intent to control their society through medical intervention, happiness, and consumerism, which has similarities to modern society. Designing life from conception is an intriguing concept. Brave New World’s World State is in control of the reproduction of people by intervening medically. The Hatchery and Conditioning Centre is the factory that produces human beings.