More handpicked essays just for you.
Abstract of conflict management and resolution
Abstract of conflict management and resolution
Short case study for conflict resolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Abstract of conflict management and resolution
Conflict in “The Inheritor” In the short story, “The Inheritor” by Frank Roberts, the major source of conflict is external; it is between the protagonist and the flood, man versus nature. From the opening lines, the flood is seen as an opposing force. ”The man saw it [the Lone Pine] … as the marker to a final refuge from the flood.” Through out the entire story, the flood remains a constant fear factor. No matter the stressing ordeal the man endured, whether it was facing a “vicious, indomitable” dingo that was “capable of savagery” or brawling with his own mind over a vulnerable ewe, the “flood consum[ing] the ground” strikes the man with the greatest fear. The flood is the story’s instigator, causing every action and thought. All other
Humankind has been facing and conquering problems, droughts, famines, and wars for instance, since the beginning of its existence. Throughout an individual’s life, obstacles arise and challenges present themselves in an attempt to inhibit the individual from moving forward. In her poem Crossing the Swamp, Mary Oliver utilizes a variety of techniques to expand on this idea, establishing a relationship between the speaker and the swamp as one of determination and realized appreciation.
Each person has their unique way of calling themselves an owner. Some are owners of a phone, but were on books today. The importance of being an owner is that we have the fall ownerships of it. However, the important question is why, do we own something we don’t use. From the essay of Mortimer Adler, “How to Mark a Book”, he explained the three way’s which someone own a book. Such as the one that just owns a book but remains unread and untouched. One who reads books left and right but refuse to leave a mark of his own. Lastly, the one who make their books apart of himself from the highlights and underlined quotes for thought, notes on the margins and all the caviar on display(1). Therefore I do agree with Mortimer Adler on How to Mark a Book.
This essay will describe Emile Durkheim’s concepts of social integration and social/moral regulation and will explain how Durkheim connects them to suicide. It will then utilize those concepts to analyze the social effects of the Buffalo Creek flood, as described in the book “Everything In Its Path�, by Kai T. Erikson, showing other consequences besides higher suicide rates.
On our planet, phenomena’s occur occasionally in nature. Tornadoes, earthquakes, and flashfloods are all types of phenomena’s that could occur. Most of these mysterious events are small and go unnoticed; however, on a rare occasion these sorts of event can be horrendous. One such occasion occurred back around 4,000 BC (Werner Keller, 48). As the story goes, God’s population was growing rapidly on earth. At this point, he had been growing bored with the same people on earth so he made sure no man would live past the age of 120. Given this time, the people of earth started to take advantage of the human race; these acts of selfishness disgusted God. He decided to destroy everything on earth. A man by the name of Noah had lived his life by God’s nature, which eventually led to a close relationship between the two. God had told Noah to build a boat with exact measurements. God had instructed Noah to put two of every kind of animal into the boat; one had to be male and the other female. Then God told Noah to get into the boat with his family, their families, and the animals. Then for forty days and forty nights the clouds seemed to have poured endless amounts of water onto the earth (Genesis 6:1-9). Floods rushed through the landscape, destroying everything in its path. The waters were higher than the tallest mountains, standing above the highest peaks. All living things on earth had died. The water covered the earth at this level for five months (Paul S. Taylor, 1). In time the water began to dry up. Eventually Noah was able to leave the ship and release all he had brought with him. From this point, evolution occurs.
In a passage from his book, Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How It Changed America, author John M. Barry makes an attempt use different rhetorical techniques to transmit his purpose. While to most, the Mississippi River is only some brown water in the middle of the state of Mississippi, to author John M. Barry, the lower Mississippi is an extremely complex and turbulent river. John M. Barry builds his ethos, uses elevated diction, several forms of figurative language, and different styles of syntax and sentence structure to communicate his fascination with the Mississippi River to a possible audience of students, teachers, and scientists.
Though scientists cannot agree on whether or not a global flood occurred, the effect of these stories on science has been monumental, as well as the effect of the stories on cultures and religions throughout the world. If this great flood did , in fact, occur, it’s effect on history would have been great because of the huge numbers of people lost to it. Though they may be fables, one must keep asking themselves if they may have been based on fact.
Inside us all there is a deep dark fear this is what grabs us by the thresh hold of life. It controls the most important aspects of our lives. This is found within the deepest and darkest chasms of our souls. The very creature that wreaks havoc in our minds we cage and never confront we lock this beast away to afraid to overcome it. If the beast is not confronted it begins to contort and change who we are as a person and how we interact with others. Even the very decisions we make as a person to affect those around us and are loved ones to also suffer the consequences of our actions. Such as the crucible and how each person was warped into their own monster by greed.
McCullough presents a meticulously researched, detailed account of the Johnstown Flood of May 31st 1889, which provides arguments for why the disaster was both “the work of man” and “a visitation of providence”. However, it is apparent that McCullough believes that man was more responsible than nature/god for the extent of the catastrophe. In McCullough’s opinion, the storm that caused the flood was no more than the inevitable stimulus of the disaster, whereas the deferred maintenance and poor repairs on the dam were the primary reason that Johnstown was devastated in 1889. McCullough exposes the failed duties of Benjamin Ruff and other members of the South Fork Fishing and Hunting Club, whilst simultaneously questioning the responsibility of the Johnstown folk who were concerned about the safety of the dam but complacently trusted the wealthy, powerful club members to fulfil their responsibilities. McCullough clearly explains the debate that took place immediately after the flood, on what or whom was to blame for the disaster, by explaining the views of the press, the townspeople and the lawsuits that were filed. McCullough’s view is evident from the sub-title of his book. By placing the word “natural” within quotation marks, McCullough immediately suggests that the flood was unusual to any other, and implies that mankind has displaced its blame onto nature.
"The monstropolous beast had left his bed. The two hundred miles an hour wind had loosed his chains. He seized hold of his dikes and ran forward until he met the quarters; uprooted them like grass and rushed on after his supposed-to-be conquerors, rolling the dikes, rolling the houses, rolling the people in the houses along with other timbers. The sea was walking the earth with a heavy heel.
For six days and nights the wind and flood raged. On the seventh day the flood abated. Everything, including mankind, had turned to mud and clay.
The heart of the Enlightenment was a country of “eternal light”(Shelly 106) . This strive for light is seen in Frankentein’s protagonist Victor, who seeks to do what no man has done before, attempting to “pioneer a new way, explore unknown powers, and unfold to the world the deepest mysteries of creation”(Shelley 38). This desire violates the nature of nature, which is often mysterious and unknown. In his quest for light he razes the boundary between life and death, creating a monster from death. This is not only a serious blow to nature, but also throws the world into chaos. Likewise in the film Beasts of the Southern Wild ( hitherto referred as Beasts) mankind beyond the Bathtub is perceived as greedy and non respectful of nature. Humans have built vast walls that stop the flow of water and have cut down forests to create factories. By building the dam they have directly stopped nature’s inherent course. The noble savages of the Beasts Wink and Hushpuppy “stare out at the distant factories behind the wall with a peaceful and confident disdain” (Beasts) referring to how “they're[man beyond the bathtub] afraid of the water like a bunch of babies” (Beasts). The commentary emphasizes how Wink and Hushpuppy believe it is foolish to reject nature and that the substitutes for nature are unsatisfactory. The removal of nature sets the world into total
William Cronon tells the “story” of postmodern environmental history and postmodern historian's various methods of narrative discourse: “As often happens in history, they [conflicting accounts] make us wonder how two competent authors looking at identical materials drawn from the same past can reach such divergent conclusions” (2). What Cronon is saying is simple; history can be told from different viewpoints. Furthermore, in his example of the case of the history of the Dust Bowl, Cronin argues that the narrative form breathes life into otherwise seemingly meaningless accounts by pitting humanity against what we call “Mother Nature”. It seems to me that, without the human element of the story, we, as humans, are not all that interested in the natural elements. For example, storms like Hurricane Katrina and Sandy come and go. Yet, without people in the story, the stories hold no significance to humans. The thought a thousand lives lost resonates in the memory more than the loss of a thousand acres of uninhabited land. It is how the chr...
The external conflict of nature against man never becomes resolved, as nature ends the man and his goals. For example, the severe cold weather prevented the man fro...
Baym, Nina, Arnold Krupat, Robert S. Levine, and Jeanne Campbell Reesman. "The Storm." The Norton Anthology of American Literature. 8th ed. Vol. C. New York, NY: Norton, 2012. 557-61. Print.
This conflict, although very real, is more about man’s ability to persevere and realize that nature simply exists with no evil intent, that in the scheme of the universe, man’s significance should not be based upon supposed supremacy. The intensity of the conflict with nature is shown with each stroke of the oars, each crash of the waves, and each bucket of water that is thrown overboard as the life boat takes on water. It is in the brutal reality of this setting that Crane acknowledges the setting as the antagonist within this tale. Nature bombards the lifeboat with a constant assault; the men are driven by the need to persevere in order to stay alive. As a result, there are moments in which a sense of fatalism can be seen as the Captain remarks, “If we don’t all get ashore – if we don’t all get ashore, I suppose you fellows know where to send news of my finish?” (344). These are crucial moments depicting that no matter the dedication and will to survive this ordeal, the lives of the men are still dependent upon the aspect of Nature being accommodating. It becomes an inner conflict against fatalism and the external conflict against nature.