Comparison Of 'The Imp And The Crust'

923 Words2 Pages

Everyone has done one of those “connect the dots” in their childhood or in their lifetime and made a picture out of those connected dots. Now, people try to connect the dots amongst the things those are not directly related. For example theology of how demons work and Leo Tolstoy’s stories. Leo Tolstoy’s stories illustrate how demons work in real life. His stories, specifically “How Much Land Does a Man Need” and “The Imp and the Crust” illustrates how demons work in real life. In “How Much Land Does a Man Need”, the devil used the main character Pahom’s greed to lead him to death, and in “The Imp and the Crust”, the devil forces the main character, a poor peasant, to sin by getting him drunk. There is a similarity between those two stories concerning the demon’s role, that the demon challenges or temps human to sin. …show more content…

Pahom, listening to their conversation, said that the only problem that the peasants have is that they don’t have enough land, and that he would not fear the devil himself if he only had enough land. The devil heard him and decided to have a little tussle with Pahom. The devil would allow him to get as much land as possible, but the devil uses his endless greed to kill him. The second story “The Imp and the Crust” starts with a poor peasant losing his last piece of bread while he was ploughing the land to make him curse and call on the demon, but the imp fails. The demon master, angered by the fact that the imp failed, ordered the imp to get the poor peasant to sin in three years, otherwise he will be dumped in holy water. The imp gives prosperity to peasant’s land to grow corns and teaches the poor peasant how to make vodka out of it.Consequently, the peasant makes vodka, gets drunk, and

Open Document