Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction for good vs evil
Introduction for good vs evil
Introduction for good vs evil
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
"Evil is a thick rope of many complex, twisted and intertwined strands” ( qtd. In Singer 185), is a quote by psychiatrist Robert L. Simon that demonstrates evil contains many ambiguous aspects. However, even though there are many parts within the concept of evil, Simon suggests that the innumerable forms of evil are connected with one another. Most people are quick to create judgments about cruel acts without considering the reasoning behind the execution of the despicable behavior. If one were to closely examine the sources of evil, one would discover that each situation contains a variety of differences and few similarities. The literary works of Beowulf and The Pardoner’s Tale demonstrate varying motives of evil, use evil to contribute to …show more content…
Singer once wrote , “ There are numerous evil persons and evil-doers in literature, as distinct from life, it is often possible to be clearer on the motives and intentions of the evil- doer”(200). In fact, within Beowulf and The Pardoner’s Tale different motives of why villainous acts are completed can be discovered. In Beowulf cruelty is used to obtain revenge and to create pleasure for the villain. For example, the work states, “ Grendel came again, so set on murder that no crime could ever be enough, no savage assault quench his lust for evil”(Beowulf 50-53). This description demonstrates that Grendel will never be able to be satisfied with his vicious acts, and he commits to evil behavior for the sake of performing destructive tasks. Another piece from the epic states, “She’d [Grendel’s Mother] taken Hrothgar’s closest friend, the man he most loved of all men on earth; she’d killed a glorious soldier, cut a noble life short” (Beowulf 414- 417). Through this section of the story, the audience learns that Grendel’s mother made a decision to kill a nobleman’s friend because of the loss of her own son. Grendel’s mother was seeking revenge and she used an opportunity to destroy the life of someone Hrothgar cared for, just as Hrothgar had done to her through Beowulf. However, in The Pardoner’s Tale, the pardoner used evil for the sake of avarice. An example of this motive of greed is found when the work states, “ For my[The Pardoner] exclusive …show more content…
The famous author, Ruth Manning Gordon once wrote, “It [evil] is a grim business, in which we are fighting not a fellow human being, but a deadly force” (67).Gordon describes evil as concocting a product of destruction. This is similar to the maliciousness that causes extermination in Beowulf and The Pardoner’sTale. An example of this destruction is illustrated in Beowulf when the author wrote, “… smashed them unknowing in their beds and ran out with their bodies, the blood dripping behind him[Grendel] , back to his lair delighted with his night’s slaughter” (37-40). The monstrous behavior exhibited by Grendel proved deadly to others and cost the innocent the precious treasure of life. Similarly, The Pardoner’s Tale also demonstrates a deathly outcome through savage decisions. For example, Chaucer states, “Thus these two murderers received their due, so did the treacherous young poisoner too” (294- 295). Evil in the end of the course of the tale has lead to the tragic downfall of three men, and the impulsive decision motivated by avarice has been executed in
Grendel in the Epic of Beowulf is portrayed as a monster, a creature that has no thoughts on who he kills.While in the movie Beowulf and Grendel(Gunnarsson 2005); he is much more human-like. In parts of the movie, thoughts are led to believe that in fact he is not out to kill random people he only harms those who have “hurt him”.This, in fact, leads to believe that Grendel from the film really wasn’t the bad guy:it shifted towards the fact that Hrothgar was the bad guy for killing Grendel 's father This ties to the fact that as we modernize we tend to need a reason to do things, most people will not endure things if in the end the end result they won 't benefit from it. Nevertheless, the film has changed the perspective and/ or natural view that one as a reader would have taken from the
Our first character, Grendel, is an exceptionally diverse character. It is implied that in both book and poem, Grendel is a blood-thirsty monster. All Grendel does is go through meadhalls and kill the drunk, often asleep people. But when narrated through the eyes of Grendel, the true nature of this beast is discovered. The author of Grendel entails that Grendel is a depressed and misunderstood monster, restrained to the confinements of his own underwater cave. He is a lot like the monster in the book Frankenstein. Both Grendel and Frankenstein are born with no real purpose to life, going off of what they hear other people say and taking it as the truth. Both monsters, knowing that everyone detests them for being unattractive and different, retaliate by way of murder and mayhem. From the perspective of the people in the stories itself, Grendel is exactly how the narrator in the poem Beowulf makes him out to be. The people, or the thanes, of Hrothgar’s kingdom see Grendel as a demon from hell, representing all that’s evil in the world. He’s a supernatural creature and in this time period anything supernatural that wasn’t human was considered a spirit, a god, evil or, in Grendel...
"She'd taken Hrothgar's closest friend, The man he loved most of all men on earth" (414-415). After the death of Grendel, his mother seeks revenge by taking one of the Dane's lives. Coincidently, the man happened to be the best friend of a king, Hrothgar. This gives Hrothgar the desire to retaliate by asking Beowulf for help. In Beowulf, motivation comes in many forms such as revenge, treasures, and fame.
As children, we were taught that good and evil were black and white terms. The fairy tales that our parents would read to us have conditioned us to believe that characters such as the princess in distress or the prince in shining armour were nothing but friendly and good, while the troll guarding his own bridge or the fire-breathing dragon were the most frighteningly evil creatures of all. However, as we grew up, we learned that these distinctions are never so easily black and white, but more-so different shades of grey. We learned that the characters that we initially deemed evil had reasons for acting that way, and most of them out of their control. Such is the case with the main character in John Gardner’s Grendel. The character Grendel
Ethics is a wide field of philosophical study to which the core of every question within falls to one side of a blurred line. On the right, is good; the value which is popularly believed to be the correct alignment for which a person should live their life according to. On the left, is evil; that which is the cause of most human misery, and prevents peace on earth. In John Gardner’s book Grendel, the retelling of the ages old story Beowulf, further blurs the line between good and evil. Circumstance and perhaps a confused view of reality allow the monster, Grendel, to conceivably defend his evil beliefs. In order to better understand evil, using Grendel as a guide, I intend to attempt to justify it.
An innocent, joyless, outcast lurks in the depths of the earth. He is feared by all due to his violent behavior and thirst for humans. Stories about this monster stretch across lands, intriguing the one and only Beowulf. In this notorious Epic, Beowulf, translated by Seamus Heaney, Grendel is the Frankenstein of this poem, the Joker of this time period, the Lord Voldemort of this book. Basically, Grendel is the villain and when there’s a villain there’s a hero. Our hero today is Beowulf, who challenges Grendel and he trounced not only Grendel but Grendel’s mother as well. Not only are Grendel and his mother villains but they also played the role of being the outcast/scapegoat. Symbolically they play the role
Dictionary.com defines evil as “the wicked or immoral part of someone or something.” Within the novel, Grendel by John Gardner evil is inescapable as this topic is discussed throughout the novel. Though the story holds a resemblance to its inspiration of the epic Beowulf in its portrayal of Grendel, it fails to highlight the underlying evil within the Anglo-Saxon’s and their values. Gardner’s novel reveals that evil is everywhere as it is seen in not only Grendel's but also in human lives and is presented in a more complex way than the epic as both have their own dark sides.
Good and evil operate and work in different environments. In the book Beowulf, light and darkness are the environments used by good and evil. Although the author shows the power of darkness, he also exhibits light’s eventual victory in Beowulf’s battle with Grendel, in Beowulf’s first skirmish with Grendel’s mom, and with the imagery created at the beginning and end of each
In any classic story about heroes and villains, the monsters involved are often characterized as the evil ones and, consequently, receive no justice under the law. Throughout the epic story Beowulf, the hero of the story encounters three monsters that are threats to society: Grendel, Grendel’s mother, and the dragon. The monsters in Beowulf are quickly targeted and destroyed because of the harm they cause to society. However, upon further examination of the monsters and the motives for their actions, the reader can view the monsters not as the cutthroat villains they may initially appear to be, but perhaps as victims of society. In today’s society, murderers and robbers are also portrayed as “monsters” because of the atrocious crimes they commit. While it is undeniably wrong to commit any kind of crime and I do not wish to condone murder or theft in any way, there may also be an ulterior explanation for why these modern “monsters” cause harm to society. In comparing and contrasting the monsters of Germanic epic with criminals of today, perhaps we can gain some insight into the motivation of both.
Since the beginning of time, fairy tales, stories and legends have shared a common theme where good and evil are played against each other. In the story of “Beowulf”, translated by, “Burton Raffel”, there is a hero who plays as a good character, and there is also a demon who rules the dark side. The hero Beowulf, agrees to take a journey to conquer the evil monster Grendel. But when Beowulf is trying to defeat the beast, Grendel fights back, causing integrity and generosity to vanish. The common theme in various tales like in Beowulf is, good vs. evil.
Some of the greatest villains in literature are characters who have merely been misunderstood. While we are drawn to literary heroes and admire their strengths, we often forget to consider the point of view of their enemies. Many of these enemies also possess strengths that the reader does not realize. Along with traditional heroes, the villain in a story can be considered an anti-hero. In the story Grendel, by John Gardner, the reader is challenged to contemplate the thoughts and feelings of the anti-hero, Grendel. Exploring heroes like Beowulf, and anti-heroes like Grendel, and the Beast in Beauty and the Beast, causes the reader to develop a better understanding of the relationship that exists between the characters and their society.
Evil. It’s a concept that has baffled philosophers, religious figures, and the common man alike for thousands of years. In this millennium, people may exemplify evil as terrorism, genocide, or, perhaps, placing an empty milk carton back in the refrigerator. However, many remain conflicted about the exact definition of evil, as the dispute over the character Grendel, from the John Gardner novel, makes evident. To conclude that Grendel is not evil, readers must first operate under the assumption that the beast is unequivocally and thoroughly evil. Having done so, readers will notice the fallacies within this thought process. By asserting that Grendel is evil, readers blatantly disregard the ambiguity with which humanity defines its actions, as
Through the analysis of characters and their actions, the novel Grendel suggests society has adopted good and evil’s unequal relationship for meaningfulness in life. The modern society is built on the opposite forces of nature and that evil must be challenged although good prevails it. However, evil and good is subjective which makes the true struggle between good and evil. Moreover, our every day actions are differentiated between good and evil acts. Unfortunately, while this occurs, good and evil will never be a black and white concept.
While the monsters of the poem are the antagonists of the poem, the author still manages to make the reader feel traces of sympathy for them. Grendel’s human depiction, exile and misery tugs at the heart of readers and indeed shows a genuine side to the figure, while Grendel’s mother and the dragon are sympathetic mainly because they were provoked into being attacked over things they both had a deep affection for. Their actions make us question whether they are as evil as they seem.
In this reimagining of the roles of good and evil, we see that there is a similar struggle in both stories. Beowulf mirrors it so closely, in fact, that careful consideration of the information plainly available can cause the lines of good and evil to blur perceptually. It is clear that the author of Beowulf had a deep understanding of the concepts of the Biblical creation story and took great care to recreate the struggle of good and evil in his epic.