Comparing Vladimir Lenin And Harry S. Truman

446 Words1 Page

Throughout history, countless people have created their own identities instead of passively accepting the expectations bestowed upon them at birth or by others. People’s identities are created by their actions, principles, and achievements, not by their social status or their name at birth. Although history is replete with such people, they were especially prevalent during the 20th century. Two of the most compelling examples are Vladimir Lenin and Harry S. Truman. During the October Revolution in Russia, an unlikely leader arose from the masses. That leader was Vladimir Lenin, a blue-collar worker, the progeny of generations of proletarians and peasants. Vladimir was expected to be no different. Yet, Lenin managed to from his own political party, the Bolsheviks, who later dominated all of Russia. Lenin overthrew the reigning Czar of Russia, Nicolas …show more content…

Unlike Lenin, this man was already of high rank – the Vice President of the United States – Harry S. Truman. Truman was seen as a clear subordinate to President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Always seen conducting trivial tasks, he was never viewed as a prominent, self-motivated leader, unlike the charismatic Roosevelt. However, when Roosevelt died in office, the Presidency was bestowed upon Harry S. Truman. Through a series of monumental decisions, Truman proved himself to be every bit as effective, tough, and decisive as his predecessor. His resolution to drop the first atomic weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the successful conclusion of WWII, and the termination of discrimination in the military formed a new identity for Truman. Obviously, Truman’s identity as a tough, resolute, and efficient President was created by his decisions during and after WWII, not existing since his inaugaration. Had Truman not actively made decisions, he wouldn’t even have an identity – he would be simply as the servile assistant who always existed in the shadow of his

Open Document