Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
romeo and juliet how does each film compliment the play?
comparison film and text romeo and juliet.
comparison of the two film version s treatment of shakespeare s romeo and juliet.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Comparing Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet
For this assignment I shall be comparing two film versions of 'Romeo
and Juliet'. The first one was directed by Franco Zefferelli in1968
and the most recent version in 1997 by baz Luhrmann. I will be
comparing the opening scene (including the prologue) up to the end of
the first fight between the two families.
Before the directors even started filming they had to have a concept
in mind, an idea, a piece of art that they would ultimately like as
all directors would, to be recognised for his talent as well as the
goal of making money to further their careers. To be able to tell a
popular story such as the play 'Romeo and Juliet' that has a universal
theme which has defied time and language barriers as well as the
original has done. They both used the basic structure of the play
written by Shakespeare but took it in to entirely different
directions. Before both films could begin shooting they needed
somewhere that would give the right impression to set the scene to
keep the audience watching.
There were in comparison things they both used such as the younger
generations were the ones causing the trouble and making the noise
this helps to show that they were using the family's feud as a way to
show they were a stronger individuals as well as a stronger family in
all cases, business or otherwise. On the other hand the oldest
generations were given the impression that they were kept in to the
back ground or out of the way when the families fought. The atmosphere
was also different throughout the film as Zefferelli's was calm and
...
... middle of paper ...
... The character Mercucio was livened up in the
play with his vivacious camp type attitude but he still did the death
scene with great emotion. This means that the actors can also change
how things are seen and Luhrmann chose as I see it the right one.
I feel that the other version in my eyes lacked the excitement that
was needed to keep my interest. The characters besides Romeo and
Juliet didn't really have anything that truly separated them from each
other as individuals and was lost in the fight scene to a blur of
yellow, red and blue. The scenes were tedious and were dragged out far
too long. The only thing I thought seemed well put together was the
attention to detail on the costumes. Overall though the replication of
Shakespeare's play was very good and believe that people that went to
see it would have liked it.
music changes to show that she is sad. We then get a close up of
Paramount aspect of the movie and the play, the theme, were the same, and the overall messages in both were the same. For example, one main message in the stories was that love conquers all. This was demonstrated in both the play and the film when Romeo and Juliet kept secretly meeting each other even though they knew it was against their families’ wishes. In one scene of both the movie and the play Romeo and Juliet even got married and died together so that even if they could not be together on earth they would be together in death.
A Comparison of Scenes From West Side Story and Romeo and Juliet Cinematography The scene before the meeting scene in West Side Story Maria spins. around in her dress the camera then carries on spinning which creates a colourful blur effect on the screen. The effect makes her look like she is almost spinning into the next scene. When Tony and Maria met, all the other characters that were dancing.
a major step in life. Because the play is not entirely trying to make the two look bad, it is the better product. & nbsp; Another major difference in the mood of the play and the movie is in the funeral scene. The funeral scene of the play is a very serious event. Juliet's family is very upset and thinks that they are the cause of her "death". Also, the Friar. soothes the family of the loss of young Juliet (Act IV, Scene 5, Line 65). However, in the movie version of the funeral scene, again everyone is sad but This time the Friar lets out a giggle as he pretends to pray for Juliet. This is a major difference because if someone had seen the Friar giggle, it may have. changed the entire play. They may have questioned him why he giggled but since he would not have a reason he may just spill what he knows. Since the movie was once again unrealistic, the play is the better production in this scene as well. & nbsp; Some other major differences between the play and the movie occurred in the plot. details. One example of this is in the beginning of the story.
In 1596, William Shakespeare published the tragic tale of two star-crossed lovers, Romeo and Juliet. The origins of this story are uncertain but Shakespeare’s chief source for his adoption of the story was from “…The Tragicall Historye of Romeus and Juliet, a poem by Arthur Brooke (1562). He also knew the story from Palace of Pleasure, by William Painter, which appeared in several editions prior to 1580.”(Boyce 563) Shakespeare’s classic tale is about “two young lovers caught in the crossfire of a senseless family feud.”(Shakespeare 3) This feud between the two families ultimately is the cause of the two lovers untimely demise. In 1996, Baz Luhrmann produced a modern film of the classic tragedy entitled William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet. Adding familiar images and common ideas, Luhrmann brought the classic story to modern times. Though Romeo + Juliet has many differences from the original version from Shakespeare, it supports the original characters, themes, dialogue, and key issues of the classic tale of the star-crossed lovers.
that he knew so he was able to tailor the parts to suit them. Women,
In the 1968 version of Romeo and Juliet, the balcony scene differs from the balcony scene in the 2013 version of Romeo and Juliet. One of the differences is the language they use; in the 2013 version the language is “modernized”, making it easier for people today to understand the film. However, some of the changes have happened because during the era the film was filmed, some technologies available to Hollywood directors weren’t available to the directors in the 1960’s. However, the directors did change some elements of the film, like the language of the film, the sound elements and the physical elements of the film.
Now in the play in act 5 a total of four of the characters died but in the movie only two died in Act 5. The only real similarities are that Romeo and Juliet die and Balthazar told Romeo that Juliet died. At the same time the differences are that in the movie Romeo never went to the apothecary witch in the play he did. Also In the movie when Romeo and Balthasar went to the Capulet tomb Romeo never gave his servant the reason why he did go into the tomb and he opened the tomb with a boulder but in the play he told Balthasar that he was going to give juliet a final kiss and retrieve a ring from her. Romeo also opened the tomb the a iron crowbar. And the biggest Difference was that Lady Montague died from grief but in the movie she lived and Romeo never fought Parris in the movie at the Capulet
The Major Differences Between Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet The major differences between the two movies Romeo and Juliet who were
...e tragic celebration of young, forbidden love told by William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, has been tailored for many motion picture adaptations. The most famous of these adaptations are Franco Zeffirelli’s version and Baz Lurhmann’s film produced in 1996. These two films applied Shakespeare’s most well-known work as a basis for their motion pictures. Both films had similarities, but the differences were much more apparent. Ever since William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet has been debuted, it has and forever will be an artistic influence for playwrights, directors, and other artists.
A Comparison of Two Film Versions of Act 3 Scene 5 of William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet
Baz Lurhmann’s creation of the film Romeo and Juliet has shown that today’s audience can still understand and appreciate William Shakespeare. Typically, when a modern audience think of Shakespeare, they immediately think it will be boring, yet Lurhmann successfully rejuvenates Romeo and Juliet. In his film production he uses a number of different cinematic techniques, costumes and a formidably enjoyable soundtrack; yet changes not one word from Shakespeare’s original play, thus making it appeal to a modern audience.
Romeo and Juliet, a story of a tragic romance between two young lovers. And within the story you find that it is different from the book to the movie. While reading the book you notice some differences between it and the movie. While watching the movie you see one difference and it is that instead of swords like the book they have guns and they called them swords. They did this as a result of the movie is in a more modern time than the book. Another difference is when Mercutio is making Romeo go to the party. In the book he talks him into going to the party. In the movie Mercutio made him take a tablet or pill of some kind to make him go. Still the same as the other difference, still in a more modern era.
‘Romeo and Juliet’ is a tragic play about two star crossed lovers written by Shakespeare in 1595. The play is a timeless teenage tradgedy. “The play champions the 16th Century belief that true love always strikes at first sight,” (Lamb 1993: Introduction) and even in modern times an audience still want to believe in such a thing as love at first sight. Act II Scene II the balcony scene displays that romantic notion perfectly.
...movie that I fell in love with. But most of all I love how the story line is a great overlap into the cinematically engaging movie. There is a great use of camera, timing, shots and story line that are portrayed in this movie without being too overwhelming. This allows the audience to relax during the movie and just take in the scenes as a story from reality. To this day, and even still doing this paper I still come to find different aspects of the movie that I missed the previous times I have watched it.