Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Shakespeare essay writing
Shakespeare essay writing
Shakespeare essay writing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Have people ever wondered which is better actually reading the the Romeo and Juliet play that's about true love or being lazy and watching the movie first and go off that ? There are major differences in comparison from the actual play from 1595 to the movie that was made in 1969. That Zeffirelli had chosen to changed while directing the Romeo and Juliet Movie were scenes like the balcony,the fighting, and the very end of Romeo and Juliet Scenes. Why did he do it no one really knows why he did. In Act II, Scene two the Balcony Scene where romeo and Juliet finally protest their love toward one another and see that they are in true love. This is one of the most important scenes because it show the love and a bond forming between the two young lovers. In the movie there were some differences and similarities. Some of the similarities are that the movie did stick with Romeo Leaving his friends behind at the part to go find Juliet. As well as the part of Rome jumps over the the Capulets garden steep wall. But there were a couple but not a whole lot of …show more content…
Now in the play in act 5 a total of four of the characters died but in the movie only two died in Act 5. The only real similarities are that Romeo and Juliet die and Balthazar told Romeo that Juliet died. At the same time the differences are that in the movie Romeo never went to the apothecary witch in the play he did. Also In the movie when Romeo and Balthasar went to the Capulet tomb Romeo never gave his servant the reason why he did go into the tomb and he opened the tomb with a boulder but in the play he told Balthasar that he was going to give juliet a final kiss and retrieve a ring from her. Romeo also opened the tomb the a iron crowbar. And the biggest Difference was that Lady Montague died from grief but in the movie she lived and Romeo never fought Parris in the movie at the Capulet
Juliet’ due to the fact that his film work was about youth and how its
music changes to show that she is sad. We then get a close up of
Even though the themes were similar, the plot of the movie and the play were rather different. In the movie, Mercutio, Romeo’s friend, got an invitation to Lord Caplet’s ball where Romeo and Juliet meet, but in the movie Romeo and this friends go to Lord Capulet’s party uninvited. What's more, is that when Romeo was at the ball he was recognized by Tybalt, Juliet’s cousin, from the sound of his voice in the play, but in the movie Tybalt sees him. In addition to that one scene where Juliet was hysterical because she thought Romeo was dead was completely absent in the movie.
Because of the difference in film techniques such as music, camera angles, and lighting Baz Luhrmann’s film version of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet captures the overall romantic tone of the balcony scene less than Franco Zeffirelli’s version.
Romeo and Juliet is a timeless, classic love story written by the incomparable William Shakespeare. Many of Shakespeare’s works are considered literary classics, but none are more loved than Romeo and Juliet. This play masterfully tells the love story of two teenagers in Elizabethan England. The title characters Romeo and Juliet are members of two feuding families, Romeo is a Montague and Juliet is a Capulet. There are different stylistic ways of portraying Romeo and Juliet, and the two most popular film versions portray two very different styles of this one play. Zeferelli's Romeo and Juliet was made in the 1970s, and is the film version most commonly shown in high school classrooms. The newest film version of this play is Baz Luhrmanns Romeo and Juliet. This version sets the classic story in a modern day setting. Both versions, while different stylistically, hold true to the basic story line of the play.
The first movie taken in the 1980’s was not as good at the original. This is due to the acting in the movie that took away from the original characters and their characterization. One example of this can be seen with Friar Lawrence, and it is seen when he leaves Juliet with Romeos body. What happens is that he seems more courageous, and tries to get Juliet out of there. However, he simply offers her little to no help in the original, and then ditches her with giving her no help what so ever. The next flaw compared to the original by Shakespeare is in the themes, and that the original focuses more on true love while the other focuses on the consequences of forbidden love. This can be seen by how dramatic and painful Romeos death is by poison and Juliet’s gory death by stabbing herself. This emphasis the consequences that are created by dangerous love. Likewise, in the original they do it gently and fast to make it seem like less of a sacrifice. The final way the Shakespearian version is better is due to the setting. The reasoning for this is because in the original the setting was open to the reader’s interpretations. While the movie just ...
The environment surrounding the star-crossed lovers in the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet can influence audiences who may interpret the scenes in different ways. The audience can be greatly affected in their interpretation of the story by the mise-en-scene, costuming, and the hidden symbolic meaning. This great piece of literature was edited in two unique and intriguing forms, one Zeferelli directed which was filmed in 1968, and the modern version produced in 1996. The different scenes throughout the length of the party were the most influential to me in that I saw how different these movies were directed, and the different meaning I experienced from watching these movies. Focusing on the environment of the scenes and the costuming helped me in my interpretation, because I found hidden symbolism in these two qualities.
There are several ways that the time period of the Romeo and Juliet movie affects the way the audience views the story. One example of this is that it is a little more acceptable for Juliet to talk back to her parents. It is not a respectful thing for her to do, but because of when the movie takes place it is not emphasized as much. Another thing that is different is the use of guns instead of swords. I believe the director used this because people do not use swords in this time period, and the audience can connect with the characters in the movie better because of these changes. One other thing that was different from the play was what kept the letter about Juliet from getting to Romeo. In 1996, there was not a concern for the plague, so the
Chloe Fleming investigates Baz Luhrmann’s capability in embodying Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet in his own modern film adaptation and praises the hell out of it.
The play Romeo and Juliet written by William Shakespeare is a breathtaking tale. That’s because its about two lovers from enemy families who fall in love with each other eventhough their families don’t approve of this. The story takes place over 5 days of their lives. By the last day, they kill themselves and their families make up becasue they realize that they are not so different from each other. Baz Lurhmens movie adaptation of the original play effectively portrays the play because he makes it more modern, the setting for the most important places is the same, and major characters’ traits are appropriately portrayed.
One of the greatest questions addressed in both Romeo and Juliet and Shakespeare in Love is the question "does love conquer all?" Should one follow his heart or should one conform to society's view as to what is proper? In the movie, love does in fact conquer all, but, in the play, it does not. In the play Romeo and Juliet decide to follow their hearts and they do not conform to society's wishes. Romeo and Juliet end up dead and the feud between the Montagues and Capulets is over. In the case of Shakespeare in Love, Will loses Viola but his love for her lives on as seen in his later writings. So, one could argue that in some instances love does indeed conquer all and, in other cases, it does not. Following the path of true love can be a tragic one as seen in Romeo and Juliet. As for Shakespeare in Love, both characters meet society's wishes and therefore return to their normal lives never being quite the same.
Zeffirelli’s ultimate goal for his version of Romeo and Juliet was to capture Shakespeare’s original intentions for the play while targeting the teenage audience of his generation. Luhrmann’s intentions were different however; he changed the way an audience looks at Shakespeare’s masterpiece by modernising the props, costumes, and sets. Obviously, to match film time quotas Zefirelli and Luhrmann has both cut many lines out of the play.
A Comparison of the Opening Sequences of Two Films Version of William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet
as if you did not concentrate you would get lost but because it was a
William Shakespeare has provided some of the most brilliant plays to ever be performed on the stage. He is also the author of numerous sonnets and poems, but he is best known for his plays such as Hamlet, Macbeth, A Midsummer Night's Dream, and Romeo and Juliet. In this essay I would like to discuss the play and movie, "Romeo and Juliet", and also the movie, Shakespeare in Love.